Associations between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and body mass index: longitudinal evidence from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey (2006-2021).

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jennifer Nkemdilim, Venurs Loh, Rebecca A Reid, Jerome N Rachele
{"title":"Associations between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and body mass index: longitudinal evidence from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey (2006-2021).","authors":"Jennifer Nkemdilim, Venurs Loh, Rebecca A Reid, Jerome N Rachele","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-223799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity prevalence differs by neighbourhood. One such characteristic of these neighbourhoods is the level of socioeconomic disadvantage. Understanding the nature of neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities is important for shaping targeted interventions and policies to promote equitable access to resources and opportunities that support healthy living. The aim of this study was to examine associations between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and body mass index (BMI) over a 16-year period among a population-representative Australian sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from 208 309 observations collected between 2006 and 2021 from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. Neighbourhood disadvantage was measured via a census-derived index, and participants self-reported height and weight, which was computed to BMI. Data were analysed using multilevel and fixed effects regression to examine overall associations, trends over time and changes in neighbourhoods with changes in BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an overall association between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and BMI. BMI was higher among those in the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods compared with the least disadvantaged neighbourhoods (β=1.31, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.46). BMI trends over time were widening with greater increases in BMI among those in the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods (Q1: β=0.04, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.06 and Q2: β=0.05, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.06). Changes in the level of neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage were positively associated with changes in BMI, with the strongest association among those transitioning to more disadvantaged neighbourhoods (Q1: β=0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.18 and Q2: β=0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using methodologically rigorous epidemiological approaches along with longitudinal, national data, this study found strong evidence of neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in BMI. Understanding the neighbourhood-level mechanisms likely to exacerbate these inequalities remains a future research priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-223799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity prevalence differs by neighbourhood. One such characteristic of these neighbourhoods is the level of socioeconomic disadvantage. Understanding the nature of neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities is important for shaping targeted interventions and policies to promote equitable access to resources and opportunities that support healthy living. The aim of this study was to examine associations between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and body mass index (BMI) over a 16-year period among a population-representative Australian sample.

Methods: This study used data from 208 309 observations collected between 2006 and 2021 from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. Neighbourhood disadvantage was measured via a census-derived index, and participants self-reported height and weight, which was computed to BMI. Data were analysed using multilevel and fixed effects regression to examine overall associations, trends over time and changes in neighbourhoods with changes in BMI.

Results: There was an overall association between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and BMI. BMI was higher among those in the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods compared with the least disadvantaged neighbourhoods (β=1.31, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.46). BMI trends over time were widening with greater increases in BMI among those in the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods (Q1: β=0.04, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.06 and Q2: β=0.05, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.06). Changes in the level of neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage were positively associated with changes in BMI, with the strongest association among those transitioning to more disadvantaged neighbourhoods (Q1: β=0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.18 and Q2: β=0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.15).

Conclusions: Using methodologically rigorous epidemiological approaches along with longitudinal, national data, this study found strong evidence of neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in BMI. Understanding the neighbourhood-level mechanisms likely to exacerbate these inequalities remains a future research priority.

社区社会经济劣势与体重指数之间的关系:来自澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态调查(2006-2021)的纵向证据。
背景:肥胖患病率因社区而异。这些社区的一个特征是社会经济劣势的程度。了解邻里社会经济不平等的性质,对于制定有针对性的干预措施和政策,促进公平获得支持健康生活的资源和机会,具有重要意义。这项研究的目的是在16年的时间里,在一个具有人口代表性的澳大利亚样本中,研究社区社会经济劣势与体重指数(BMI)之间的关系。方法:本研究使用了2006年至2021年间从澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态调查中收集的208309项观察数据。邻里劣势是通过人口普查得出的指数来衡量的,参与者自我报告身高和体重,然后计算成BMI。使用多水平和固定效应回归分析数据,以检查BMI变化的总体关联、趋势和社区变化。结果:社区社会经济劣势与BMI之间存在总体关联。最弱势社区的BMI高于最弱势社区(β=1.31, 95% CI 1.15至1.46)。随着时间的推移,BMI趋势逐渐扩大,最弱势社区的BMI增加幅度更大(Q1: β=0.04, 95% CI 0.02至0.06;Q2: β=0.05, 95% CI 0.03至0.06)。社区社会经济劣势水平的变化与BMI的变化呈正相关,在向更弱势社区过渡的人群中相关性最强(Q1: β=0.10, 95% CI 0.02至0.18;Q2: β=0.08, 95% CI 0.02至0.15)。结论:采用严谨的流行病学方法和纵向的国家数据,本研究发现了社区社会经济不平等在BMI方面的有力证据。了解可能加剧这些不平等的社区层面机制仍然是未来研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信