Unsupervised clustering of single-lead electrocardiograms associates with prevalent and incident heart failure in coronary artery disease.

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf013
Josseline Madrid, William J Young, Stefan van Duijvenboden, Michele Orini, Patricia B Munroe, Julia Ramírez, Ana Mincholé
{"title":"Unsupervised clustering of single-lead electrocardiograms associates with prevalent and incident heart failure in coronary artery disease.","authors":"Josseline Madrid, William J Young, Stefan van Duijvenboden, Michele Orini, Patricia B Munroe, Julia Ramírez, Ana Mincholé","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Clinical consequences of coronary artery disease (CAD) are varied [e.g. atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF)], and current risk stratification tools are ineffective. We aimed to identify clusters of individuals with CAD exhibiting unique patterns on the electrocardiogram (ECG) in an unsupervised manner and assess their association with cardiovascular risk.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Twenty-one ECG markers were derived from single-lead median-beat ECGs of 1928 individuals with CAD without a previous diagnosis of AF, HF, or ventricular arrhythmia (VA) from the imaging study in UK Biobank (CAD-IMG-UKB). An unsupervised clustering algorithm was used to group these markers into distinct clusters. We characterized each cluster according to their demographic and ECG characteristics, as well as their prevalent and incident risk of AF, HF, and VA (4-year median follow-up). Validation and association with prevalent diagnoses were performed in an independent cohort of 1644 individuals. The model identified two clusters within the CAD-IMG-UKB cohort. Cluster 1 (<i>n</i> = 359) exhibited prolonged QRS duration and QT intervals, along with greater morphological variations in QRS and T-waves, compared with Cluster 2 (<i>n</i> = 1569). Cluster 1, relative to Cluster 2, had a significantly higher risk of incident HF [hazard ratio (HR): 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51-3.83], confirmed by independent validation (HR: 1.77, CI: 1.31-2.41). It also showed a higher association with prevalent HF (odds ratio: 4.10, CI: 2.02-8.29), independent of clinical risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our approach identified a cluster of individuals with CAD sharing ECG characteristics indicating HF risk, holding significant implications for targeted treatment and prevention enabling accessible large-scale screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 3","pages":"435-446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Clinical consequences of coronary artery disease (CAD) are varied [e.g. atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF)], and current risk stratification tools are ineffective. We aimed to identify clusters of individuals with CAD exhibiting unique patterns on the electrocardiogram (ECG) in an unsupervised manner and assess their association with cardiovascular risk.

Methods and results: Twenty-one ECG markers were derived from single-lead median-beat ECGs of 1928 individuals with CAD without a previous diagnosis of AF, HF, or ventricular arrhythmia (VA) from the imaging study in UK Biobank (CAD-IMG-UKB). An unsupervised clustering algorithm was used to group these markers into distinct clusters. We characterized each cluster according to their demographic and ECG characteristics, as well as their prevalent and incident risk of AF, HF, and VA (4-year median follow-up). Validation and association with prevalent diagnoses were performed in an independent cohort of 1644 individuals. The model identified two clusters within the CAD-IMG-UKB cohort. Cluster 1 (n = 359) exhibited prolonged QRS duration and QT intervals, along with greater morphological variations in QRS and T-waves, compared with Cluster 2 (n = 1569). Cluster 1, relative to Cluster 2, had a significantly higher risk of incident HF [hazard ratio (HR): 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51-3.83], confirmed by independent validation (HR: 1.77, CI: 1.31-2.41). It also showed a higher association with prevalent HF (odds ratio: 4.10, CI: 2.02-8.29), independent of clinical risk factors.

Conclusion: Our approach identified a cluster of individuals with CAD sharing ECG characteristics indicating HF risk, holding significant implications for targeted treatment and prevention enabling accessible large-scale screening.

无监督的单导联心电图聚类与冠状动脉疾病中常见和偶发心力衰竭相关。
目的:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的临床后果多种多样[如心房颤动(AF)和心力衰竭(HF)],目前的风险分层工具是无效的。我们的目的是在无监督的情况下确定冠心病患者在心电图(ECG)上表现出独特模式的人群,并评估他们与心血管风险的关系。方法和结果:从英国生物银行(CAD- img - ukb)的影像学研究中获得的1928例CAD患者的单导联中拍心电图中获得21个ECG标记,这些患者以前没有诊断为房颤、心衰或室性心律失常(VA)。使用无监督聚类算法将这些标记划分为不同的聚类。我们根据他们的人口学特征和心电图特征,以及他们的房颤、心衰和房颤的流行和事件风险(中位随访4年)来描述每个集群。在1644个个体的独立队列中进行了验证和与流行诊断的关联。该模型确定了CAD-IMG-UKB队列中的两个集群。与集群2 (n = 1569)相比,集群1 (n = 359)表现出更长的QRS持续时间和QT间期,以及更大的QRS和t波形态学变化。相对于聚类2,聚类1发生HF的风险明显更高[风险比(HR): 2.40, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.51-3.83],经独立验证证实(HR: 1.77, CI: 1.31-2.41)。与临床危险因素无关,它还显示与流行HF有较高的相关性(优势比:4.10,CI: 2.02-8.29)。结论:我们的方法确定了一组CAD患者,他们的心电图特征表明有HF风险,这对有针对性的治疗和预防具有重要意义,可以进行大规模筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信