Feasibility, safety and patient perceptions of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation in a multicentre real-world setting after myocardial infarction-the remote exercise SWEDEHEART study.

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf014
Maria Bäck, Margret Leosdottir, Mattias Ekström, Kristina Hambraeus, Annica Ravn-Fischer, Sabina Borg, Madeleine Brosved, Marcus Flink, Kajsa Hedin, Charlotta Lans, Jessica Olovsson, Charlotte Urell, Birgitta Öberg, Stefan James
{"title":"Feasibility, safety and patient perceptions of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation in a multicentre real-world setting after myocardial infarction-the remote exercise SWEDEHEART study.","authors":"Maria Bäck, Margret Leosdottir, Mattias Ekström, Kristina Hambraeus, Annica Ravn-Fischer, Sabina Borg, Madeleine Brosved, Marcus Flink, Kajsa Hedin, Charlotta Lans, Jessica Olovsson, Charlotte Urell, Birgitta Öberg, Stefan James","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cardiac telerehabilitation addresses common barriers for attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR). Pragmatic real-world studies are however lacking, limiting generalizability of available evidence. We aimed to evaluate feasibility, safety, and patient perceptions of remotely delivered EBCR in a multicentre clinical practice setting after myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This study included 232 post-MI patients (63.7 years, 77.5% men) from 23 cardiac rehabilitation centres in Sweden (2020-22). Exercise was delivered twice per week for 3 months through a real-time group-based video meeting connecting a physiotherapist to patients exercising at home. Outcomes were assessed before and after remote EBCR completion and comprised assessment of physical fitness, self-reported physical activity and exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-efficacy for exercise, exercise adherence, patient acceptance. Safety monitoring in terms of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) was recorded. A total of 67.2% of the patients attended ≥ 75% of prescribed exercise sessions. Significant improvements in physical fitness, self-reported exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, and HRQoL were observed. Patients agreed that remote EBCR improved health care access (83%), was easy to use (94%) and found exercise performance and interaction acceptable (95%). Sixteen exercise-related AEs (most commonly dizziness and musculoskeletal symptoms) were registered, all of which were resolved. Two SAEs requiring hospitalization were reported, both unrelated to exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multicentre study supports remote EBCR post-MI as feasible and safe with a high patient acceptance in a real-world setting. The clinical effectiveness needs to be confirmed in a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04260958.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 3","pages":"508-518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac telerehabilitation addresses common barriers for attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR). Pragmatic real-world studies are however lacking, limiting generalizability of available evidence. We aimed to evaluate feasibility, safety, and patient perceptions of remotely delivered EBCR in a multicentre clinical practice setting after myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods and results: This study included 232 post-MI patients (63.7 years, 77.5% men) from 23 cardiac rehabilitation centres in Sweden (2020-22). Exercise was delivered twice per week for 3 months through a real-time group-based video meeting connecting a physiotherapist to patients exercising at home. Outcomes were assessed before and after remote EBCR completion and comprised assessment of physical fitness, self-reported physical activity and exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-efficacy for exercise, exercise adherence, patient acceptance. Safety monitoring in terms of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) was recorded. A total of 67.2% of the patients attended ≥ 75% of prescribed exercise sessions. Significant improvements in physical fitness, self-reported exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, and HRQoL were observed. Patients agreed that remote EBCR improved health care access (83%), was easy to use (94%) and found exercise performance and interaction acceptable (95%). Sixteen exercise-related AEs (most commonly dizziness and musculoskeletal symptoms) were registered, all of which were resolved. Two SAEs requiring hospitalization were reported, both unrelated to exercise.

Conclusion: This multicentre study supports remote EBCR post-MI as feasible and safe with a high patient acceptance in a real-world setting. The clinical effectiveness needs to be confirmed in a randomized controlled trial.

Trial registration number: NCT04260958.

心肌梗死后多中心现实环境中基于运动的心脏远程康复的可行性、安全性和患者感知——远程运动SWEDEHEART研究
目的:心脏远程康复解决了参加基于运动的心脏康复(EBCR)的常见障碍。然而,缺乏实用的现实世界研究,限制了现有证据的普遍性。我们旨在评估在心肌梗死(MI)后多中心临床实践环境中远程递送EBCR的可行性、安全性和患者感知。方法和结果:本研究包括来自瑞典23个心脏康复中心的232例心肌梗死后患者(63.7岁,77.5%为男性)(2020- 2022年)。每周进行两次锻炼,持续3个月,通过实时小组视频会议将物理治疗师与在家锻炼的患者联系起来。结果在远程EBCR完成前后进行评估,包括身体健康评估、自我报告的身体活动和运动、身体能力、运动恐惧症、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、运动自我效能、运动依从性、患者接受度。记录不良事件(AE)和严重不良事件(SAE)方面的安全监测。67.2%的患者参加了≥75%的规定运动。观察到身体健康、自我报告的锻炼、身体能力、运动恐惧症和HRQoL的显著改善。患者认为远程EBCR改善了医疗服务的可及性(83%),易于使用(94%),运动表现和互动可接受(95%)。16例与运动相关的不良反应(最常见的是头晕和肌肉骨骼症状)被记录下来,所有这些症状都得到了解决。报告了两例需要住院治疗的SAEs,均与运动无关。结论:这项多中心研究支持心肌梗死后远程EBCR的可行性和安全性,在现实环境中患者接受度高。临床疗效有待随机对照试验证实。试验注册号:NCT04260958。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信