The Search for the Holy Grail in Running Biomechanics: Is There an Ideal Movement Profile for Minimizing Mechanical Overload?

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Gustavo Leporace, Eliane C Guadagnin, Felipe P Carpes, Jonathan Gustafson, Felipe F Gonzalez, Jorge Chahla, Leonardo Metsavaht
{"title":"The Search for the Holy Grail in Running Biomechanics: Is There an Ideal Movement Profile for Minimizing Mechanical Overload?","authors":"Gustavo Leporace, Eliane C Guadagnin, Felipe P Carpes, Jonathan Gustafson, Felipe F Gonzalez, Jorge Chahla, Leonardo Metsavaht","doi":"10.1177/19417381251338267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Running biomechanics can influence injury risk, but whether the combined effect of different biomechanical factors can be identified by individual running profiles remains unclear. Here, we identified distinct biomechanical profiles among healthy runners, examined lower limb mechanical load characteristics, and evaluated potential implications for injury risk.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Multiple factors would serve as a common denominator allowing identification of specific patterns.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Step cadence, stance time, vertical oscillation, duty factor, vertical stiffness, peak ground reaction force (GRF), and anteroposterior, lateral, and vertical smoothness were determined from 3-dimensional kinematic data from 79 healthy runners using a treadmill at 2.92 m/s. Principal component analysis, self-organizing maps, and K-means clustering techniques delineated distinct biomechanical running profiles. Mutual information analysis, Kruskal-Wallis, and Pearson's Chi-squared tests were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five biomechanical profiles (P1-P5) demonstrated different running mechanical characteristics: P1 exhibited low cumulative and peak mechanical load due to a combination of high duty factor, low step cadence, and longer stance time; P2 showed characteristics associated with the lowest peak mechanical load due to reduced peak GRF and greater smoothness; P3 and P5 showed contrasting running patterns, but maintained moderate smoothness and peak GRF; and P4 exhibited the highest peak mechanical load, driven by high GRF, low duty factor, and high vertical oscillation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5 profiles appear to be associated with different lower limb load patterns, highlighting previously unrecognized connections between biomechanical variables during running. Some variables contribute to increased peak and cumulative load, whereas others help reduce it, underscoring the complex interplay of biomechanical factors in running.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Identifying distinct running profiles can help clinicians better understand individual variations in mechanical load and injury risk, thus informing targeted interventions, such as personalized training adjustments or rehabilitation programs, to prevent injuries and enhance performance in runners.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251338267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251338267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Running biomechanics can influence injury risk, but whether the combined effect of different biomechanical factors can be identified by individual running profiles remains unclear. Here, we identified distinct biomechanical profiles among healthy runners, examined lower limb mechanical load characteristics, and evaluated potential implications for injury risk.

Hypothesis: Multiple factors would serve as a common denominator allowing identification of specific patterns.

Study design: Cross-sectional.

Level of evidence: Level 2.

Methods: Step cadence, stance time, vertical oscillation, duty factor, vertical stiffness, peak ground reaction force (GRF), and anteroposterior, lateral, and vertical smoothness were determined from 3-dimensional kinematic data from 79 healthy runners using a treadmill at 2.92 m/s. Principal component analysis, self-organizing maps, and K-means clustering techniques delineated distinct biomechanical running profiles. Mutual information analysis, Kruskal-Wallis, and Pearson's Chi-squared tests were conducted.

Results: Five biomechanical profiles (P1-P5) demonstrated different running mechanical characteristics: P1 exhibited low cumulative and peak mechanical load due to a combination of high duty factor, low step cadence, and longer stance time; P2 showed characteristics associated with the lowest peak mechanical load due to reduced peak GRF and greater smoothness; P3 and P5 showed contrasting running patterns, but maintained moderate smoothness and peak GRF; and P4 exhibited the highest peak mechanical load, driven by high GRF, low duty factor, and high vertical oscillation.

Conclusion: The 5 profiles appear to be associated with different lower limb load patterns, highlighting previously unrecognized connections between biomechanical variables during running. Some variables contribute to increased peak and cumulative load, whereas others help reduce it, underscoring the complex interplay of biomechanical factors in running.

Clinical relevance: Identifying distinct running profiles can help clinicians better understand individual variations in mechanical load and injury risk, thus informing targeted interventions, such as personalized training adjustments or rehabilitation programs, to prevent injuries and enhance performance in runners.

在跑步生物力学中寻找圣杯:是否有一个理想的运动轮廓来最小化机械过载?
背景:跑步生物力学可以影响损伤风险,但不同生物力学因素的综合作用是否可以通过个人跑步特征来识别尚不清楚。在这里,我们确定了健康跑步者不同的生物力学特征,检查了下肢机械负荷特征,并评估了潜在的损伤风险。假设:多个因素将作为一个公分母,允许识别特定的模式。研究设计:横断面。证据等级:二级。方法:从79名健康跑步者在2.92 m/s的跑步机上的三维运动学数据中测定步速、站立时间、垂直振荡、占空因子、垂直刚度、峰值地面反力(GRF)以及前后、横向和垂直平整度。主成分分析、自组织图和k均值聚类技术描绘了不同的生物力学跑步特征。进行互信息分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Pearson卡方检验。结果:P1- p5组表现出不同的跑步力学特征:P1组由于高占空因子、低步速和较长的站立时间的组合而表现出较低的累积和峰值机械负荷;P2表现出与最低峰值机械载荷相关的特征,因为峰值GRF降低,平滑度更高;P3和P5表现出不同的运行模式,但保持中等的平整度和峰值GRF;P4表现出高GRF、低占空因子和高垂直振荡驱动的最大峰值机械载荷。结论:这5种特征似乎与不同的下肢负荷模式有关,突出了以前未被认识到的跑步过程中生物力学变量之间的联系。一些变量有助于增加峰值和累积负荷,而另一些则有助于减少负荷,强调了跑步中生物力学因素的复杂相互作用。临床相关性:识别不同的跑步特征可以帮助临床医生更好地了解机械负荷和受伤风险的个体差异,从而为有针对性的干预提供信息,例如个性化的训练调整或康复计划,以预防受伤并提高跑步者的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信