Deep learning on electrocardiogram waveforms to stratify risk of obstructive stable coronary artery disease.

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf020
Rishi K Trivedi, I Min Chiu, John Weston Hughes, Albert J Rogers, David Ouyang
{"title":"Deep learning on electrocardiogram waveforms to stratify risk of obstructive stable coronary artery disease.","authors":"Rishi K Trivedi, I Min Chiu, John Weston Hughes, Albert J Rogers, David Ouyang","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD) incidence continues to rise with an increasing burden of chronic coronary disease (CCD). Current probability-based risk assessment for obstructive CAD (oCAD) lacks sufficient diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm utilizing electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms and clinical features to predict oCAD in patients with suspected CCD.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The study includes subjects undergoing invasive angiography for evaluation of CCD over a 4-year period at a quaternary care centre. oCAD was defined as performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on assessment by interventional cardiologists during elective angiography. DL models were developed for ECG waveforms alone (DL-ECG), clinical features from standard risk scores (DL-Clinical), and the combination of ECG waveforms and clinical features (DL-MM); a commonly used pre-test probability estimation tool from the CAD Consortium study was used for comparison (CAD2) [3]. The CAD2 model [AUC 0.733 (0.717-0.750)] had similar performance as the DL-Clinical model [AUC 0.762 (0.746-0.778)]. The DL-ECG model [AUC 0.741 (0.726-0.758)] had similar performance as both the clinical feature models. The DL-MM model [AUC 0.807 (0.793-0.822)] had a superior performance. Validation in an external cohort demonstrated similar performance in the DL-MM [AUC 0.716 (0.707-0.726)] and CAD2 risk score [AUC 0.715 (0.705-0.724)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multi-modality DL model utilizing ECG waveforms and clinical risk factors can improve prediction of oCAD in CCD compared with risk-factor based models. Prospective research is warranted to determine whether incorporating DL methods in ECG analysis improves diagnosis of oCAD and outcomes in CCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 3","pages":"456-465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Coronary artery disease (CAD) incidence continues to rise with an increasing burden of chronic coronary disease (CCD). Current probability-based risk assessment for obstructive CAD (oCAD) lacks sufficient diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm utilizing electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms and clinical features to predict oCAD in patients with suspected CCD.

Methods and results: The study includes subjects undergoing invasive angiography for evaluation of CCD over a 4-year period at a quaternary care centre. oCAD was defined as performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on assessment by interventional cardiologists during elective angiography. DL models were developed for ECG waveforms alone (DL-ECG), clinical features from standard risk scores (DL-Clinical), and the combination of ECG waveforms and clinical features (DL-MM); a commonly used pre-test probability estimation tool from the CAD Consortium study was used for comparison (CAD2) [3]. The CAD2 model [AUC 0.733 (0.717-0.750)] had similar performance as the DL-Clinical model [AUC 0.762 (0.746-0.778)]. The DL-ECG model [AUC 0.741 (0.726-0.758)] had similar performance as both the clinical feature models. The DL-MM model [AUC 0.807 (0.793-0.822)] had a superior performance. Validation in an external cohort demonstrated similar performance in the DL-MM [AUC 0.716 (0.707-0.726)] and CAD2 risk score [AUC 0.715 (0.705-0.724)].

Conclusion: A multi-modality DL model utilizing ECG waveforms and clinical risk factors can improve prediction of oCAD in CCD compared with risk-factor based models. Prospective research is warranted to determine whether incorporating DL methods in ECG analysis improves diagnosis of oCAD and outcomes in CCD.

基于心电图波形的深度学习对阻塞性稳定期冠状动脉疾病的风险进行分层。
目的:随着慢性冠状动脉疾病(CCD)负担的增加,冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的发病率持续上升。目前基于概率的阻塞性CAD (oCAD)风险评估缺乏足够的诊断准确性。我们旨在开发并验证一种利用心电图(ECG)波形和临床特征来预测疑似CCD患者oCAD的深度学习(DL)算法。方法和结果:该研究包括在四级护理中心接受侵入性血管造影以评估CCD的受试者,为期4年。oCAD被定义为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的表现,基于介入心脏病专家在选择性血管造影期间的评估。建立单独ECG波形(DL-ECG)、标准风险评分临床特征(DL-临床)和ECG波形与临床特征结合(DL- mm)的DL模型;使用CAD联盟研究中常用的测试前概率估计工具进行比较(CAD2)[3]。CAD2模型[AUC 0.733(0.717-0.750)]与DL-Clinical模型[AUC 0.762(0.746-0.778)]具有相似的性能。DL-ECG模型[AUC 0.741(0.726-0.758)]与两种临床特征模型的表现相似。DL-MM模型[AUC 0.807(0.793-0.822)]表现较好。在外部队列验证中,DL-MM [AUC 0.716(0.707-0.726)]和CAD2风险评分[AUC 0.715(0.705-0.724)]的表现相似。结论:与基于危险因素的模型相比,利用心电波形和临床危险因素的多模态DL模型能提高对CCD中oCAD的预测。有必要进行前瞻性研究,以确定将DL方法纳入ECG分析是否能改善oCAD的诊断和CCD的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信