The Forcing Factors of Physical Inactivity and Obesity in the United States - An Artificial Intelligence Analysis of an Ecological Framework.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ross Arena, Shuaijie Wang, Nicolaas P Pronk, Colin Woodard, Tanvi Bhatt
{"title":"The Forcing Factors of Physical Inactivity and Obesity in the United States - An Artificial Intelligence Analysis of an Ecological Framework.","authors":"Ross Arena, Shuaijie Wang, Nicolaas P Pronk, Colin Woodard, Tanvi Bhatt","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A sedentary lifestyle and obesity are primary factors forcing the ongoing chronic disease health crisis in the United States. The aim of the current study is to assess whether an ecological framework can predict United States physical inactivity and obesity prevalence using an artificial intelligence model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study utilized several United States county-level datasets representing 12 predictive variables of the ecologic framework. A nonlinear artificial intelligence statistical approach was used to assess the ability of these variables (i.e, features) to predict United States county-level physical inactivity and obesity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The R² values demonstrated that the performance of Extra Trees models was different across the 2 outcomes. While models for both physical inactivity and obesity prediction were significant, physical inactivity always exhibited the higher R² for each feature number (6-12) compared with obesity. These models' performance was also influenced by the number of features. An increase in the number of features led generally to improved model performance. For physical inactivity, the highest R² and lowest AIC was achieved using all 12 features, hence, the 12-feature model was identified as the optimal model for physical inactivity prediction. For obesity, the highest R² and lowest AIC was achieved using 10 features.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results further support validity of the proposed ecological framework, including culture, politics, policy, and social, physical, and economic environment factors in explaining variability in United States physical inactivity and obesity prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.05.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A sedentary lifestyle and obesity are primary factors forcing the ongoing chronic disease health crisis in the United States. The aim of the current study is to assess whether an ecological framework can predict United States physical inactivity and obesity prevalence using an artificial intelligence model.

Methods: The current study utilized several United States county-level datasets representing 12 predictive variables of the ecologic framework. A nonlinear artificial intelligence statistical approach was used to assess the ability of these variables (i.e, features) to predict United States county-level physical inactivity and obesity.

Results: The R² values demonstrated that the performance of Extra Trees models was different across the 2 outcomes. While models for both physical inactivity and obesity prediction were significant, physical inactivity always exhibited the higher R² for each feature number (6-12) compared with obesity. These models' performance was also influenced by the number of features. An increase in the number of features led generally to improved model performance. For physical inactivity, the highest R² and lowest AIC was achieved using all 12 features, hence, the 12-feature model was identified as the optimal model for physical inactivity prediction. For obesity, the highest R² and lowest AIC was achieved using 10 features.

Conclusion: These results further support validity of the proposed ecological framework, including culture, politics, policy, and social, physical, and economic environment factors in explaining variability in United States physical inactivity and obesity prevalence.

美国缺乏运动和肥胖的强迫因素——生态框架的人工智能分析。
背景:久坐不动的生活方式和肥胖是导致美国慢性疾病健康危机的主要因素。当前研究的目的是评估生态框架是否可以使用人工智能模型预测美国的身体活动不足和肥胖患病率。方法:目前的研究利用了几个美国县级数据集,代表了12个生态框架的预测变量。使用非线性人工智能统计方法来评估这些变量(即特征)预测美国县级缺乏运动和肥胖的能力。结果:R²值表明Extra trees模型在两种结果下的性能是不同的。虽然缺乏运动和肥胖的预测模型都是显著的,但与肥胖相比,缺乏运动在每个特征数(6-12)上总是表现出更高的R²。这些模型的性能也受到特征数量的影响。特征数量的增加通常会提高模型的性能。对于缺乏运动,所有12个特征均可获得最高的R²和最低的AIC,因此,12特征模型被认为是缺乏运动预测的最佳模型。对于肥胖,使用10个特征获得最高R²和最低AIC。结论:这些结果进一步支持了所提出的生态框架的有效性,包括文化、政治、政策以及社会、物理和经济环境因素,可以解释美国缺乏运动和肥胖患病率的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信