Failing more freestanding performance validity tests results in progressive artificial lowering of invalid neuropsychological test scores.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tyler J Kukla, John-Christopher A Finley, G Whitman Kent, Bailey O Newkirk, Allison D Payne, Ollie Fegter, Steven A Abalos, Luke G Petry, Matthew S Phillips, Brian M Cerny, Jason R Soble
{"title":"Failing more freestanding performance validity tests results in progressive artificial lowering of invalid neuropsychological test scores.","authors":"Tyler J Kukla, John-Christopher A Finley, G Whitman Kent, Bailey O Newkirk, Allison D Payne, Ollie Fegter, Steven A Abalos, Luke G Petry, Matthew S Phillips, Brian M Cerny, Jason R Soble","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2507204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Administering multiple performance validity tests (PVTs) is essential throughout neuropsychological evaluations to objectively determine test performance validity, with ≥2 PVT failures generally indicating invalid performance. However, the impact of exceeding this standard invalidity threshold remains unclear. This study explored whether neuropsychological test scores are artificially lowered in a \"dose-dependent\" manner as the number of freestanding PVT failures increases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 358 clinical referrals from an academic medical center who underwent neuropsychological evaluations. All patients were administered 5 freestanding PVTs and a battery of 12 neuropsychological tests, which were also used to compute a neuropsychological test composite score calculated from averaging all 12 individual test scores. Analyses of variance examined differences in mean test scores across PVT failure groups (0,1,2,3, and 4-5 failures).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As the number of PVT failures increased, patients showed significantly more artificial lowering of neuropsychological test scores. The composite T-score had the largest effect size (<i>ηp<sup>2</sup></i>=.348), with those failing 4-5 PVTs scoring over 2 standard deviations below the population mean. Higher PVT failure groups (3-5) had elevated rates of external incentives, primary psychiatric diagnoses/attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and lower rates of primary medical/neurologic conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support a dose-dependent relationship between freestanding PVT failures and neuropsychological test scores such that additional PVT failures resulted in progressively more pronounced artificial lowering of scores. Findings highlight the importance of considering the number of PVT failures along with binary valid/invalid classification in diagnostic contexts, especially in psychiatric populations, where higher rates of PVT failure are observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2507204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Administering multiple performance validity tests (PVTs) is essential throughout neuropsychological evaluations to objectively determine test performance validity, with ≥2 PVT failures generally indicating invalid performance. However, the impact of exceeding this standard invalidity threshold remains unclear. This study explored whether neuropsychological test scores are artificially lowered in a "dose-dependent" manner as the number of freestanding PVT failures increases.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 358 clinical referrals from an academic medical center who underwent neuropsychological evaluations. All patients were administered 5 freestanding PVTs and a battery of 12 neuropsychological tests, which were also used to compute a neuropsychological test composite score calculated from averaging all 12 individual test scores. Analyses of variance examined differences in mean test scores across PVT failure groups (0,1,2,3, and 4-5 failures).

Results: As the number of PVT failures increased, patients showed significantly more artificial lowering of neuropsychological test scores. The composite T-score had the largest effect size (ηp2=.348), with those failing 4-5 PVTs scoring over 2 standard deviations below the population mean. Higher PVT failure groups (3-5) had elevated rates of external incentives, primary psychiatric diagnoses/attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and lower rates of primary medical/neurologic conditions.

Conclusions: Results support a dose-dependent relationship between freestanding PVT failures and neuropsychological test scores such that additional PVT failures resulted in progressively more pronounced artificial lowering of scores. Findings highlight the importance of considering the number of PVT failures along with binary valid/invalid classification in diagnostic contexts, especially in psychiatric populations, where higher rates of PVT failure are observed.

未通过更多独立效能效度测试的患者,其无效神经心理测试分数会被人为地逐步降低。
背景:在整个神经心理学评估过程中,进行多项效能效度测试(PVT)是客观确定测试效能效度的必要条件,PVT失败≥2次通常表明效能无效。然而,超过这一标准的无效阈值的影响仍不清楚。本研究探讨了当独立PVT失败次数增加时,神经心理学测试分数是否以“剂量依赖”的方式被人为降低。方法:对某学术医疗中心358例接受神经心理学评估的临床转诊患者进行横断面分析。所有患者均接受5次独立pvt和12次神经心理测试,这些测试也用于计算神经心理测试综合评分,该评分由所有12个个体测试分数的平均值计算得出。方差分析检验了PVT失败组(0、1、2、3和4-5次失败)平均测试分数的差异。结果:随着PVT失败次数的增加,患者神经心理测试分数明显被人为降低。综合t评分具有最大的效应量(ηp2=.348),未达到4-5个pvt的患者得分低于总体平均值2个标准差以上。PVT失败率较高的组(3-5)有较高的外部激励、原发性精神病学诊断/注意缺陷/多动障碍的发生率,以及较低的原发性医学/神经系统疾病发生率。结论:结果支持独立式PVT失败与神经心理测试分数之间的剂量依赖关系,即额外的PVT失败导致分数逐渐更明显的人为降低。研究结果强调了在诊断背景下考虑PVT失败数量以及二元有效/无效分类的重要性,特别是在观察到较高PVT失败率的精神病学人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信