Comparing Virtual Reality and Balance Beam Training vs. Virtual Reality Alone for Balance Improvement.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Kanokporn Pooranawatthanakul, Jirapa Cannong, Thanakrit Thanasombut, Nicharee Hanprerakriengkrai, Maria Justine, Akkradate Siriphorn
{"title":"Comparing Virtual Reality and Balance Beam Training vs. Virtual Reality Alone for Balance Improvement.","authors":"Kanokporn Pooranawatthanakul, Jirapa Cannong, Thanakrit Thanasombut, Nicharee Hanprerakriengkrai, Maria Justine, Akkradate Siriphorn","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2025.2506756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>This study investigated whether combining virtual reality (vr) with balance beam training enhances balance performance in young adults more effectively than vr alone, addressing the limited research on their combined effects. thirty-nine participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: </strong>VR with balance beam training, VR alone, or a control group. Participants in the VR groups completed a 5-min rope walking VR game in four sessions per day, 3 days per week, for 4 weeks. Balance was assessed using the Neurocom Balance Master before and after the intervention. Both the combined VR and balance beam group and the VR alone group showed significant improvements compared to the control group, including reduced tandem walk end sway, increased movement velocity, improved maximum excursion in the limit of stability, and decreased sway velocity during single-leg stance with eyes opened. However, no significant differences were found between the combined group and the VR alone group. These findings suggest that both VR combined with balance beam training and VR alone can significantly improve balance in young adults. This indicates that either approach could be effectively used to enhance balance in this population.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>The study was registered at www.thaiclinicaltrials.org (No. TCTR20201217005).</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2506756","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated whether combining virtual reality (vr) with balance beam training enhances balance performance in young adults more effectively than vr alone, addressing the limited research on their combined effects. thirty-nine participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: VR with balance beam training, VR alone, or a control group. Participants in the VR groups completed a 5-min rope walking VR game in four sessions per day, 3 days per week, for 4 weeks. Balance was assessed using the Neurocom Balance Master before and after the intervention. Both the combined VR and balance beam group and the VR alone group showed significant improvements compared to the control group, including reduced tandem walk end sway, increased movement velocity, improved maximum excursion in the limit of stability, and decreased sway velocity during single-leg stance with eyes opened. However, no significant differences were found between the combined group and the VR alone group. These findings suggest that both VR combined with balance beam training and VR alone can significantly improve balance in young adults. This indicates that either approach could be effectively used to enhance balance in this population.

Clinical trial registration number: The study was registered at www.thaiclinicaltrials.org (No. TCTR20201217005).

比较虚拟现实和平衡木训练与虚拟现实单独提高平衡。
这项研究调查了虚拟现实(vr)与平衡木训练相结合是否比单独使用vr更有效地提高了年轻人的平衡能力,解决了对两者联合效果的有限研究。39名参与者被随机分配到三组中的一组:VR与平衡木训练,单独VR或对照组。VR组的参与者完成了一个5分钟的绳走VR游戏,每天4次,每周3天,持续4周。在干预前后使用Neurocom Balance Master评估平衡性。与对照组相比,VR联合平衡木组和VR单独组均有显著改善,包括减少串联行走末端摇摆,增加运动速度,改善稳定性极限的最大偏移,以及减少单腿站立时的摇摆速度。然而,在联合组和单独VR组之间没有发现显著差异。这些发现表明VR结合平衡木训练和单独VR都能显著改善年轻人的平衡能力。这表明,任何一种方法都可以有效地用于增强这一群体的平衡。临床试验注册号:本研究注册于www.thaiclinicaltrials.org (No. 5)。TCTR20201217005)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信