The effect of whole-course specialized case management and intravenous therapy on negative emotions in patients with postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Litao Zhang, Qiufeng Li, Xiaoxia Guo
{"title":"The effect of whole-course specialized case management and intravenous therapy on negative emotions in patients with postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer.","authors":"Litao Zhang, Qiufeng Li, Xiaoxia Guo","doi":"10.1177/00912174251340754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo explore the impact of comprehensive professional case management on the negative emotions of breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy.MethodsA total of 102 breast cancer patients who underwent their first radiation treatment between July 2021 and June 2022 at a hospital in Guangzhou, China, were randomly assigned to two groups: a control group of 51 patients who received routine nursing care, and an intervention group of 51 patients who received comprehensive professional case management in addition to routine nursing care, including personalized interventions such as extended care for breast cancer patients with indwelling infusion ports. The effects of the intervention were evaluated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Self-Efficacy Scale (positive attitude, self-relaxation, and self-decision making) before and after the intervention.ResultsThere was no significant difference in anxiety, depression, or self-efficacy scores between the two groups before radiation therapy (<i>P</i> > .05). However, the SAS and SDS scores of the intervention group after radiation therapy (43.32 ± 3.87 and 40.7 ± 2.89, respectively) were significantly lower than those of the control group (49.66 ± 3.49 and 49.2 ± 3.19, respectively; t = -8.672 and -14.130, <i>P</i> < .01). The self-efficacy scores of the intervention group after radiation therapy (Positive Attitude: 49.3 ± 1.31, Self-Relaxation: 9.04 ± .68, and Self-Decision Making: 37.03 ± .98) were also significantly higher than those of the control group (Positive Attitude: 44.6 ± .95, Self-Relaxation: 7.32 ± .53, and Self-Decision Making: 31.42 ± .89; t = 20.483, 17.15, and 30.330, respectively; <i>P</i> < .01).ConclusionComprehensive professional case management, in conjunction with specialized intravenous therapy nursing, compared to usual standard care, significantly improved negative emotions and self-efficacy in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50294,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"912174251340754"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00912174251340754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore the impact of comprehensive professional case management on the negative emotions of breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy.MethodsA total of 102 breast cancer patients who underwent their first radiation treatment between July 2021 and June 2022 at a hospital in Guangzhou, China, were randomly assigned to two groups: a control group of 51 patients who received routine nursing care, and an intervention group of 51 patients who received comprehensive professional case management in addition to routine nursing care, including personalized interventions such as extended care for breast cancer patients with indwelling infusion ports. The effects of the intervention were evaluated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Self-Efficacy Scale (positive attitude, self-relaxation, and self-decision making) before and after the intervention.ResultsThere was no significant difference in anxiety, depression, or self-efficacy scores between the two groups before radiation therapy (P > .05). However, the SAS and SDS scores of the intervention group after radiation therapy (43.32 ± 3.87 and 40.7 ± 2.89, respectively) were significantly lower than those of the control group (49.66 ± 3.49 and 49.2 ± 3.19, respectively; t = -8.672 and -14.130, P < .01). The self-efficacy scores of the intervention group after radiation therapy (Positive Attitude: 49.3 ± 1.31, Self-Relaxation: 9.04 ± .68, and Self-Decision Making: 37.03 ± .98) were also significantly higher than those of the control group (Positive Attitude: 44.6 ± .95, Self-Relaxation: 7.32 ± .53, and Self-Decision Making: 31.42 ± .89; t = 20.483, 17.15, and 30.330, respectively; P < .01).ConclusionComprehensive professional case management, in conjunction with specialized intravenous therapy nursing, compared to usual standard care, significantly improved negative emotions and self-efficacy in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

全程专科病例管理和静脉治疗对乳腺癌术后放疗患者负性情绪的影响。
目的探讨综合专业病例管理对乳腺癌术后放疗患者负性情绪的影响。方法将2021年7月至2022年6月在中国广州某医院接受首次放射治疗的102例乳腺癌患者随机分为两组:对照组51例患者接受常规护理,干预组51例患者在常规护理的基础上进行全面的专业病例管理,包括对留置输液口乳腺癌患者的延伸护理等个性化干预。采用干预前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和自我效能量表(积极态度、自我放松和自我决策)评价干预效果。结果两组患者放疗前焦虑、抑郁、自我效能评分差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。但干预组放疗后SAS、SDS评分(分别为43.32±3.87、40.7±2.89)明显低于对照组(分别为49.66±3.49、49.2±3.19);t = -8.672和-14.130,P < 0.01)。干预组放射治疗后自我效能评分(积极态度:49.3±1.31,自我放松:9.04±0.68,自我决策:37.03±0.98)显著高于对照组(积极态度:44.6±0.95,自我放松:7.32±0.53,自我决策:31.42±0.89);T = 20.483, 17.15, 30.330;P < 0.01)。结论与常规标准护理相比,综合的专业病例管理配合专科静脉治疗护理可显著改善乳腺癌放疗患者的负性情绪和自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (IJPM) bridges the gap between clinical psychiatry research and primary care clinical research. Providing a forum for addressing: The relevance of psychobiological, psychological, social, familial, religious, and cultural factors in the development and treatment of illness; the relationship of biomarkers to psychiatric symptoms and syndromes in primary care...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信