Rubric system for the evaluation of root canal treatment of single canal tooth performed by preclinical dental students: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.3 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ahmad Jabali, Riyadh Alroomy, Mohammed Mashyakhy, Hashim Bajawi, Ahmed Abdullah Al Malwi, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari
{"title":"Rubric system for the evaluation of root canal treatment of single canal tooth performed by preclinical dental students: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ahmad Jabali, Riyadh Alroomy, Mohammed Mashyakhy, Hashim Bajawi, Ahmed Abdullah Al Malwi, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari","doi":"10.1007/s44445-025-00008-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study aims to investigate the utilization of an analytic rubric system to assess the performance of preclinical dental students in executing root canal treatment for a single canal maxillary anterior tooth. An analytic rubric comprising three parameters was developed for the preparation of root canal treatment of single canal maxillary anterior tooth by 34 fourth-year dental students (17 males and 17 females) in a preclinical endodontic course. Three examiners independently assessed the students' performance on access cavities, cleaning and shaping, and obturation using a 5-point scale. The total scores were calculated out of 15 points. The reliability of the rubric was confirmed using the ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient). Pearson correlation analysis was employed to measure the association between grade point average (GPA) and gender with the outcome of single canal root canal treatment and overall rubric scores from different examiners. All the students received an excellent (4/5) rating on all parameters, with no significant differences in overall rubric grading between genders (p-value 0.797). The interexaminer reliability assessed using the Kappa test revealed good to high reliability for access cavity and obturation but low reliability for cleaning and shaping. Meanwhile, the intraexaminer reliability evaluated using ICC was excellent, with values of over 0.60 for all the measured parameters. A significant correlation was observed between the GPA and the overall rubric scores from two examiners. This study found no significant gender differences in performance for root canal treatment of a single canal tooth during the preclinical endodontic phase, with an excellent rating achieved for all the parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":"37 1-3","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44445-025-00008-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aims to investigate the utilization of an analytic rubric system to assess the performance of preclinical dental students in executing root canal treatment for a single canal maxillary anterior tooth. An analytic rubric comprising three parameters was developed for the preparation of root canal treatment of single canal maxillary anterior tooth by 34 fourth-year dental students (17 males and 17 females) in a preclinical endodontic course. Three examiners independently assessed the students' performance on access cavities, cleaning and shaping, and obturation using a 5-point scale. The total scores were calculated out of 15 points. The reliability of the rubric was confirmed using the ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient). Pearson correlation analysis was employed to measure the association between grade point average (GPA) and gender with the outcome of single canal root canal treatment and overall rubric scores from different examiners. All the students received an excellent (4/5) rating on all parameters, with no significant differences in overall rubric grading between genders (p-value 0.797). The interexaminer reliability assessed using the Kappa test revealed good to high reliability for access cavity and obturation but low reliability for cleaning and shaping. Meanwhile, the intraexaminer reliability evaluated using ICC was excellent, with values of over 0.60 for all the measured parameters. A significant correlation was observed between the GPA and the overall rubric scores from two examiners. This study found no significant gender differences in performance for root canal treatment of a single canal tooth during the preclinical endodontic phase, with an excellent rating achieved for all the parameters.

评价临床前牙科学生单根管牙根管治疗的评分系统:一项横断面研究。
本研究旨在利用分析评分系统来评估临床前牙学生在单根管上颌前牙根管治疗中的表现。对34名四年级学生(男17名,女17名)在临床前牙髓学课程中进行的单管上颌前牙根管治疗准备工作,建立了包含三个参数的分析准则。三名审查员使用5分制独立评估学生在通道腔,清洁和成型以及封闭方面的表现。总分以15分计算。使用ICC(类内相关系数)来确认分类的信度。采用Pearson相关分析来衡量平均绩点(GPA)和性别与单管根管治疗结果和不同主考官的总体评分之间的关系。所有学生在所有参数上都获得了优秀(4/5)的评分,性别之间的总体评分没有显著差异(p值为0.797)。经Kappa测验评估的间测者信度显示,通道腔和封闭的信度较高,而清洁和整形的信度较低。同时,使用ICC评估的内测者信度非常好,所有测量参数的值都超过0.60。在GPA和两名主考官的总体评分之间观察到显著的相关性。本研究发现,在临床前根管治疗阶段,单根管牙齿的根管治疗表现没有显著的性别差异,所有参数都获得了优异的评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Dental Journal
Saudi Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信