Safety and efficacy of Silodosin as medical expulsive therapy after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients ‍‍with renal stones.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mohammed Lotfi Amer, Mohamed Essam Elkholefy, Heba Dawoud, Mohamed Gaber, Osama Mostafa El-Gamal, Tarek Gameel
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of Silodosin as medical expulsive therapy after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients ‍‍with renal stones.","authors":"Mohammed Lotfi Amer, Mohamed Essam Elkholefy, Heba Dawoud, Mohamed Gaber, Osama Mostafa El-Gamal, Tarek Gameel","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01760-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of Silodosin as a medical expulsive therapy following shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in paediatric patients with renal stones. In this prospective randomized controlled study conducted at Tanta University Hospital from January 2022 to March 2024, thirty children with a single de novo radiopaque renal pelvic stone less than 2 cm scheduled for SWL were randomized into two equal groups. Group A (n = 15) received Silodosin 4 mg once daily after the first SWL session, and Group B (n = 15) received a matching placebo. The first dose was administered on the night of the initial SWL session and continued until stone-free status was confirmed, for a maximum of 4 weeks. The stone expulsion time was set as a primary outcome, while the secondary outcomes were one-session stone-free rate (SFR), postoperative pain scores, and Silodosin related adverse events. The results showed that the mean stone expulsion time in group A (11.4 ± 1.8 days) was significantly shorter compared to group B (16.4 ± 1.6 days; P < 0.0001). One-session SFR was 86.6% in Silodosin group compared to 73.3% in Placebo group (P = 0.6). Pain visual analogue scores were significantly lower in group A (2.31 ± 1.75) than in group B (5.08 ± 2.43; P = 0.003). No severe drug-related adverse effects were reported in either group. In conclusion, Silodosin appears to be a safe and effective adjunct to SWL in paediatric patients, significantly reducing stone expulsion time and postoperative pain. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01760-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of Silodosin as a medical expulsive therapy following shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in paediatric patients with renal stones. In this prospective randomized controlled study conducted at Tanta University Hospital from January 2022 to March 2024, thirty children with a single de novo radiopaque renal pelvic stone less than 2 cm scheduled for SWL were randomized into two equal groups. Group A (n = 15) received Silodosin 4 mg once daily after the first SWL session, and Group B (n = 15) received a matching placebo. The first dose was administered on the night of the initial SWL session and continued until stone-free status was confirmed, for a maximum of 4 weeks. The stone expulsion time was set as a primary outcome, while the secondary outcomes were one-session stone-free rate (SFR), postoperative pain scores, and Silodosin related adverse events. The results showed that the mean stone expulsion time in group A (11.4 ± 1.8 days) was significantly shorter compared to group B (16.4 ± 1.6 days; P < 0.0001). One-session SFR was 86.6% in Silodosin group compared to 73.3% in Placebo group (P = 0.6). Pain visual analogue scores were significantly lower in group A (2.31 ± 1.75) than in group B (5.08 ± 2.43; P = 0.003). No severe drug-related adverse effects were reported in either group. In conclusion, Silodosin appears to be a safe and effective adjunct to SWL in paediatric patients, significantly reducing stone expulsion time and postoperative pain. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

西洛多辛作为儿科肾结石患者冲击波碎石后医学排出治疗的安全性和有效性‍‍。
本研究旨在评估西洛多辛作为儿科肾结石患者冲击波碎石(SWL)后医学排出疗法的安全性和有效性。这项前瞻性随机对照研究于2022年1月至2024年3月在坦塔大学医院进行,30名新发肾盆腔结石小于2 cm的儿童计划行SWL,随机分为两组。A组(n = 15)在第一次SWL疗程后接受西洛多辛4 mg,每天1次,B组(n = 15)接受匹配的安慰剂。第一剂在最初SWL疗程的晚上给药,并持续到确认无结石状态,最多持续4周。结石排出时间被设定为主要终点,而次要终点是一次手术无结石率(SFR)、术后疼痛评分和西洛多辛相关不良事件。结果显示,A组平均结石排出时间(11.4±1.8 d)明显短于B组(16.4±1.6 d);P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信