Comparison of differences in intraoperative blood loss between left-sided and right-sided robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Tomoya Yokoi, Rina Ogawa, Eriko Tanaka, Masanori Ito, Heisuke Iijima, Takehiro Takahashi, Masakatsu Ueda, Yusuke Shiraishi, Koji Yoshimura
{"title":"Comparison of differences in intraoperative blood loss between left-sided and right-sided robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.","authors":"Tomoya Yokoi, Rina Ogawa, Eriko Tanaka, Masanori Ito, Heisuke Iijima, Takehiro Takahashi, Masakatsu Ueda, Yusuke Shiraishi, Koji Yoshimura","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02380-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for small-diameter renal tumors, specifically focusing on intraoperative blood loss differences between left and right sides. The study, referenced as ROID2114, involved a retrospective analysis of 173 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors at our institution from November 2016 to March 2024. We evaluated the demographic data, operative duration, and blood loss between groups with right-sided and left-sided tumors. Increased blood loss was classified as a 75th percentile threshold of ≥ 200 ml, and multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with elevated blood loss. Among the patients, 93 (53.8%) had right-sided tumors. No significant differences were found in age, operative time, RENAL score, tumor size, body mass index (BMI), MAP score, or surgical approach between the two sides; however, intraoperative blood loss was notably higher on the right side (100 mL) compared to the left (50 mL, p = 0.016). The multivariate analysis identified several factors linked to increased blood loss: extended operative time (≥ 202 min; p = 0.01, odds ratio 2.81, 95% CI 1.26-6.28), larger tumor size (≥ 27 mm; p = 0.04, odds ratio 2.21, 95% CI 1.02-4.81), and right-sided tumors (p = 0.01, odds ratio 2.82, 95% CI 1.28-6.23). Thus, right-sided tumors, longer operative durations, and RENAL scores exceeding 6 are correlated with heightened intraoperative blood loss in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02380-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for small-diameter renal tumors, specifically focusing on intraoperative blood loss differences between left and right sides. The study, referenced as ROID2114, involved a retrospective analysis of 173 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors at our institution from November 2016 to March 2024. We evaluated the demographic data, operative duration, and blood loss between groups with right-sided and left-sided tumors. Increased blood loss was classified as a 75th percentile threshold of ≥ 200 ml, and multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with elevated blood loss. Among the patients, 93 (53.8%) had right-sided tumors. No significant differences were found in age, operative time, RENAL score, tumor size, body mass index (BMI), MAP score, or surgical approach between the two sides; however, intraoperative blood loss was notably higher on the right side (100 mL) compared to the left (50 mL, p = 0.016). The multivariate analysis identified several factors linked to increased blood loss: extended operative time (≥ 202 min; p = 0.01, odds ratio 2.81, 95% CI 1.26-6.28), larger tumor size (≥ 27 mm; p = 0.04, odds ratio 2.21, 95% CI 1.02-4.81), and right-sided tumors (p = 0.01, odds ratio 2.82, 95% CI 1.28-6.23). Thus, right-sided tumors, longer operative durations, and RENAL scores exceeding 6 are correlated with heightened intraoperative blood loss in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

左侧与右侧机器人辅助肾部分切除术术中出血量差异的比较。
本研究探讨机器人辅助肾部分切除术治疗小直径肾肿瘤,特别关注术中左右两侧出血量的差异。该研究编号为ROID2114,回顾性分析了2016年11月至2024年3月在我院接受机器人辅助部分肾肿瘤切除术的173例患者。我们评估了右侧和左侧肿瘤组的人口统计学数据、手术时间和出血量。失血增加被分类为≥200 ml的第75百分位阈值,并进行多因素分析以确定与失血升高相关的危险因素。其中93例(53.8%)为右侧肿瘤。两组患者在年龄、手术时间、肾评分、肿瘤大小、体重指数(BMI)、MAP评分、手术入路等方面均无显著差异;但术中右侧出血量(100 mL)明显高于左侧出血量(50 mL, p = 0.016)。多因素分析确定了与出血量增加相关的几个因素:手术时间延长(≥202 min;p = 0.01,优势比2.81,95% CI 1.26-6.28),肿瘤大小较大(≥27 mm;p = 0.04,优势比2.21,95% CI 1.02-4.81),右侧肿瘤(p = 0.01,优势比2.82,95% CI 1.28-6.23)。因此,在机器人辅助部分肾切除术中,右侧肿瘤、较长的手术时间和肾评分超过6分与术中出血量增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信