Existence and manifestations of human dignity: can a person be deprived of dignity?

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICAL ETHICS
Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jmehm.v17i8.17107
Seyed Abdosaleh Jafari, Nafiseh Tavasoli, Hanieh Tavasoli, Soheil Abedi, Seyed Abolhasan Navvab, Bagher Talebi Darabi
{"title":"Existence and manifestations of human dignity: can a person be deprived of dignity?","authors":"Seyed Abdosaleh Jafari, Nafiseh Tavasoli, Hanieh Tavasoli, Soheil Abedi, Seyed Abolhasan Navvab, Bagher Talebi Darabi","doi":"10.18502/jmehm.v17i8.17107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The criteria for assigning human dignity have been a subject of debate among researchers for years. Regardless of what criteria are chosen for human dignity, each school of thought must provide a method to identify them in people. The authors of this article consider voluntarily in choosing goodness and virtues to be the criterion. The purpose of this article is to present a method for establishing the existence of this criterion in humans and to examine the various manifestations of acting freely on what is good and virtuous by citing philosophical Islamic sources, especially the Qur'an. In this article, we will first discuss the differences among people regarding the existence of dignity and its manifestations, and move on to investigate the special conditions that can be challenging for allocation of dignity across different schools of thought. Finally, we will examine various Islamic sources to evaluate the methods of identifying human dignity in people. Our investigations show that since concepts such as \"right\" and \"good\" are of a subjective nature, there is more than one manifestation for presence of criterion of human dignity, and in practice, no one can be deprived of their dignity.</p>","PeriodicalId":45276,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v17i8.17107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The criteria for assigning human dignity have been a subject of debate among researchers for years. Regardless of what criteria are chosen for human dignity, each school of thought must provide a method to identify them in people. The authors of this article consider voluntarily in choosing goodness and virtues to be the criterion. The purpose of this article is to present a method for establishing the existence of this criterion in humans and to examine the various manifestations of acting freely on what is good and virtuous by citing philosophical Islamic sources, especially the Qur'an. In this article, we will first discuss the differences among people regarding the existence of dignity and its manifestations, and move on to investigate the special conditions that can be challenging for allocation of dignity across different schools of thought. Finally, we will examine various Islamic sources to evaluate the methods of identifying human dignity in people. Our investigations show that since concepts such as "right" and "good" are of a subjective nature, there is more than one manifestation for presence of criterion of human dignity, and in practice, no one can be deprived of their dignity.

人的尊严的存在和表现:一个人可以被剥夺尊严吗?
赋予人类尊严的标准多年来一直是研究人员争论的话题。无论人类尊严的标准是什么,每个思想流派都必须提供一种方法来识别人的尊严。本文的作者认为,选择善与德是自愿的标准。本文的目的是提出一种方法来确立这一标准在人类中的存在性,并通过引用伊斯兰哲学资料,特别是古兰经,来研究自由行动的各种表现形式,以确定什么是善和美德。在这篇文章中,我们将首先讨论人与人之间关于尊严的存在及其表现形式的差异,然后继续调查在不同思想流派之间分配尊严可能具有挑战性的特殊条件。最后,我们将研究各种伊斯兰来源,以评估识别人类尊严的方法。我们的调查表明,由于“对”和“好”等概念具有主观性,因此存在不止一种人类尊严标准的表现形式,并且在实践中,任何人的尊严都不能被剥夺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信