A Scoping Review of Interventions to Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the United States Healthcare Workforce.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Katherine A Hill, Andrew W Austin, Felicity T Enders
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Interventions to Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the United States Healthcare Workforce.","authors":"Katherine A Hill, Andrew W Austin, Felicity T Enders","doi":"10.1177/23821205251333034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diversifying the healthcare workforce is critical to achieving a healthier, more equitable society.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this literature review was to examine and synthesize the literature on interventions to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in people who are currently enrolled in the workforce or in a terminal degree/training program and who are located in the following institution types: medical centers; healthcare organizations; and schools of dentistry, medicine, nursing, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and public health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed on November 2, 2023 in Ovid MEDLINE<sup>®</sup>. We reviewed titles and abstracts of all retrieved articles from 2000 forward and the full text of articles included in the final review. We included English-language articles published in peer-reviewed journals that detailed 1 or more interventions to promote DEI in the United States and United States territories. All data included in the final review was extracted by a single investigator and charted using an Excel spreadsheet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified 55 articles for inclusion, 4 of which aggregated and analyzed data from many interventions. The remainder detailed 52 interventions across 25 states and Puerto Rico. Most articles did not include a comparison group (38, 69%). The types of interventions identified were: institutional change (14, 27%), mentorship (13, 25%), development programs (13, 25%), pathway programs (5, 10%), financial support (2, 4%), and workshops (2, 4%). Three (6%) interventions could not be categorized. Most studies detailed interventions in medicine (28, 54%) and nursing (11, 21%), focused on racial and ethnic (42, 81%) and/or sex (12, 23%) diversity, and targeted students (33, 64%) and/or faculty/staff (28, 54%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many different types of interventions have been trialed to promote workforce DEI in the United States healthcare workforce. These efforts must continue to achieve a diverse and equitable healthcare workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251333034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251333034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diversifying the healthcare workforce is critical to achieving a healthier, more equitable society.

Objectives: The objective of this literature review was to examine and synthesize the literature on interventions to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in people who are currently enrolled in the workforce or in a terminal degree/training program and who are located in the following institution types: medical centers; healthcare organizations; and schools of dentistry, medicine, nursing, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and public health.

Methods: A literature search was performed on November 2, 2023 in Ovid MEDLINE®. We reviewed titles and abstracts of all retrieved articles from 2000 forward and the full text of articles included in the final review. We included English-language articles published in peer-reviewed journals that detailed 1 or more interventions to promote DEI in the United States and United States territories. All data included in the final review was extracted by a single investigator and charted using an Excel spreadsheet.

Results: The authors identified 55 articles for inclusion, 4 of which aggregated and analyzed data from many interventions. The remainder detailed 52 interventions across 25 states and Puerto Rico. Most articles did not include a comparison group (38, 69%). The types of interventions identified were: institutional change (14, 27%), mentorship (13, 25%), development programs (13, 25%), pathway programs (5, 10%), financial support (2, 4%), and workshops (2, 4%). Three (6%) interventions could not be categorized. Most studies detailed interventions in medicine (28, 54%) and nursing (11, 21%), focused on racial and ethnic (42, 81%) and/or sex (12, 23%) diversity, and targeted students (33, 64%) and/or faculty/staff (28, 54%).

Conclusion: Many different types of interventions have been trialed to promote workforce DEI in the United States healthcare workforce. These efforts must continue to achieve a diverse and equitable healthcare workforce.

促进美国医疗保健劳动力多样性、公平性和包容性的干预措施的范围审查。
背景:卫生保健人力的多样化对于实现一个更健康、更公平的社会至关重要。目的:本文献综述的目的是检查和综合有关干预措施的文献,以促进目前在职人员或在终端学位/培训计划中的人员的多样性,公平性和包容性(DEI),并位于以下机构类型:医疗中心;医疗组织;以及牙科、医学、护理、执业护士、医师助理和公共卫生学校。方法:于2023年11月2日在Ovid MEDLINE®进行文献检索。我们回顾了自2000年以来所有检索到的文章的标题和摘要以及最终评审中包含的文章的全文。我们纳入了发表在同行评议期刊上的英文文章,这些文章详细介绍了在美国和美国领土促进DEI的一种或多种干预措施。最终综述中包含的所有数据均由一名研究者提取,并使用Excel电子表格绘制图表。结果:作者确定了55篇纳入的文章,其中4篇汇总并分析了来自许多干预措施的数据。其余部分详细介绍了25个州和波多黎各的52项干预措施。大多数文章没有包括对照组(38.69%)。确定的干预措施类型为:制度变革(14.27%)、指导(13.25%)、发展计划(13.25%)、途径计划(5.10%)、财政支持(2.4%)和研讨会(2.4%)。3项(6%)干预措施无法分类。大多数研究详细介绍了医学(28.54%)和护理(11.21%)方面的干预措施,重点关注种族和民族(42.81%)和/或性别(12.23%)多样性,并以学生(33.64%)和/或教职员工(28.54%)为目标。结论:许多不同类型的干预措施已被试验,以促进劳动力DEI在美国医疗保健工作人员。这些努力必须继续,以实现多样化和公平的卫生保健工作队伍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信