The Contributions-and Collapse-of Lamarckism in Pasteurian Molecular Biology: 2. Enzymatic Adaptation, 1920-1965.

IF 0.6 1区 哲学 Q4 BIOLOGY
Journal of the History of Biology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-20 DOI:10.1007/s10739-025-09818-7
Laurent Loison
{"title":"The Contributions-and Collapse-of Lamarckism in Pasteurian Molecular Biology: 2. Enzymatic Adaptation, 1920-1965.","authors":"Laurent Loison","doi":"10.1007/s10739-025-09818-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article is the second part of an elucidation of the complex relationship between Lamarckism (broadly speaking) and the rise of the French school of molecular biology at the Pasteur Institute. In the first part, Jean Gayon, Richard Burian and this author (2017) showed how the characterization of the bacteriophage's development cycle was first theorized on the basis of several Lamarckian conceptions of the inheritance of acquired characters, before it came to be understood in strictly molecular and genetic terms by André Lwoff and then François Jacob after the Second World War. This article focuses on the second line of research that led to the lactose operon model, that of enzymatic adaptation. This history does not show the exact same pattern: this time, the issue of Lamarckian heredity played a less important (yet still significant) role. To a greater extent, the question of finality and finalism was the main concern of the work of Jacques Monod, Melvin Cohn and their collaborators. This article examines how Monod took up the challenge of a Lamarckian finalism that was typical of French interwar biology and how, at the end of the 1950s, he had to radically rethink the place of finality in the characterization of molecular structures. This article also reconstructs the theoretical and experimental context in which the concept of \"cellular memory\" originated, a concept that could easily have fit with Lamarckian interpretations. Thus, in the field of enzymatic adaptation too, certain aspects of Lamarckism played a key role as a challenge for the nascent molecular biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Biology","volume":" ","pages":"247-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Biology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-025-09818-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is the second part of an elucidation of the complex relationship between Lamarckism (broadly speaking) and the rise of the French school of molecular biology at the Pasteur Institute. In the first part, Jean Gayon, Richard Burian and this author (2017) showed how the characterization of the bacteriophage's development cycle was first theorized on the basis of several Lamarckian conceptions of the inheritance of acquired characters, before it came to be understood in strictly molecular and genetic terms by André Lwoff and then François Jacob after the Second World War. This article focuses on the second line of research that led to the lactose operon model, that of enzymatic adaptation. This history does not show the exact same pattern: this time, the issue of Lamarckian heredity played a less important (yet still significant) role. To a greater extent, the question of finality and finalism was the main concern of the work of Jacques Monod, Melvin Cohn and their collaborators. This article examines how Monod took up the challenge of a Lamarckian finalism that was typical of French interwar biology and how, at the end of the 1950s, he had to radically rethink the place of finality in the characterization of molecular structures. This article also reconstructs the theoretical and experimental context in which the concept of "cellular memory" originated, a concept that could easily have fit with Lamarckian interpretations. Thus, in the field of enzymatic adaptation too, certain aspects of Lamarckism played a key role as a challenge for the nascent molecular biology.

拉马克主义在巴氏分子生物学中的贡献与瓦解:2。酶适应,1920-1965。
本文是阐述拉马克主义(广义上说)与巴斯德研究所法国分子生物学学派的兴起之间复杂关系的第二部分。在第一部分中,Jean Gayon、Richard Burian和本作者(2017)展示了噬菌体发育周期的表征是如何首先在拉马克关于获得性遗传的几个概念的基础上进行理论化的,然后在第二次世界大战后由andr Lwoff和franois Jacob从严格的分子和遗传角度来理解它。本文的重点是导致乳糖操纵子模型的第二线研究,即酶适应。这段历史并没有显示出完全相同的模式:这一次,拉马克的遗传问题扮演了一个不那么重要(但仍然重要)的角色。在更大程度上,最终性和最终主义的问题是雅克·莫诺、梅尔文·科恩及其合作者工作的主要关注点。本文考察了莫诺是如何接受拉马克决定论的挑战的,这是两次世界大战之间法国生物学的典型特征,以及在20世纪50年代末,他是如何从根本上重新思考决定论在分子结构表征中的地位的。本文还重建了“细胞记忆”概念产生的理论和实验背景,这一概念很容易与拉马克的解释相吻合。因此,在酶适应领域,拉马克主义的某些方面作为对新生分子生物学的挑战发挥了关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the History of Biology
Journal of the History of Biology 生物-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of Biology is devoted to the history of the life sciences, with additional interest and concern in philosophical and social issues confronting biology in its varying historical contexts. While all historical epochs are welcome, particular attention has been paid in recent years to developments during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. JHB is a recognized forum for scholarship on Darwin, but pieces that connect Darwinism with broader social and intellectual issues in the life sciences are especially encouraged. The journal serves both the working biologist who needs a full understanding of the historical and philosophical bases of the field and the historian of biology interested in following developments and making historiographical connections with the history of science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信