Management of endophthalmitis: to culture or not to culture?

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Annika G Samuelson, Samir N Patel, Sunir J Garg
{"title":"Management of endophthalmitis: to culture or not to culture?","authors":"Annika G Samuelson, Samir N Patel, Sunir J Garg","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review the role of microbial cultures in managing endophthalmitis following cataract surgery and intravitreal injections.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The endophthalmitis vitrectomy study (EVS) continues to guide the management of endophthalmitis including its recommendation for intraocular vitreous sampling. Vitreous cultures have better diagnostic yield than aqueous cultures. Advances in culture techniques have improved the efficiency and sensitivity of pathogen identification. While culture results are useful for prognostication, microbiology data rarely changes management in endophthalmitis following cataract surgery or intravitreal injections. Endophthalmitis managed without microbial cultures had similar outcomes to eyes managed with microbial cultures.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite advances in culture techniques, most institutions still rely on gram stain and microbial cultures, often requiring several days for results. Initial administration of empiric antibiotics occurs before microbiology data becomes available, limiting the utility of cultures in clinical management. Despite concerns for antibiotic resistance, the large majority of postcataract surgery and postintravitreal injection endophthalmitis pathogens are susceptible to vancomycin and ceftazidime. Given this, obtaining intraocular specimens can be deferred if it poses a delay to prompt treatment with intravitreal antibiotics. Emerging culture techniques hold promise for more rapid and sensitive pathogen identification, which could change the landscape of culture guidelines and improve clinical usefulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To review the role of microbial cultures in managing endophthalmitis following cataract surgery and intravitreal injections.

Recent findings: The endophthalmitis vitrectomy study (EVS) continues to guide the management of endophthalmitis including its recommendation for intraocular vitreous sampling. Vitreous cultures have better diagnostic yield than aqueous cultures. Advances in culture techniques have improved the efficiency and sensitivity of pathogen identification. While culture results are useful for prognostication, microbiology data rarely changes management in endophthalmitis following cataract surgery or intravitreal injections. Endophthalmitis managed without microbial cultures had similar outcomes to eyes managed with microbial cultures.

Summary: Despite advances in culture techniques, most institutions still rely on gram stain and microbial cultures, often requiring several days for results. Initial administration of empiric antibiotics occurs before microbiology data becomes available, limiting the utility of cultures in clinical management. Despite concerns for antibiotic resistance, the large majority of postcataract surgery and postintravitreal injection endophthalmitis pathogens are susceptible to vancomycin and ceftazidime. Given this, obtaining intraocular specimens can be deferred if it poses a delay to prompt treatment with intravitreal antibiotics. Emerging culture techniques hold promise for more rapid and sensitive pathogen identification, which could change the landscape of culture guidelines and improve clinical usefulness.

眼内炎的处理:培养还是不培养?
目的:回顾微生物培养在白内障手术和玻璃体内注射后眼内炎治疗中的作用。最近发现:眼内炎玻璃体切除术研究(EVS)继续指导眼内炎的治疗,包括推荐眼内玻璃体取样。玻璃体培养比水培养有更好的诊断率。培养技术的进步提高了病原菌鉴定的效率和灵敏度。虽然培养结果对预后有用,但微生物学数据很少改变白内障手术或玻璃体内注射后眼内炎的处理。不进行微生物培养的眼内炎与进行微生物培养的眼内炎结果相似。尽管培养技术有所进步,但大多数机构仍然依赖革兰氏染色和微生物培养,通常需要几天才能得到结果。经验性抗生素的初始施用发生在微生物学数据可用之前,限制了培养物在临床管理中的效用。尽管担心抗生素耐药性,但绝大多数白内障术后和玻璃体注射后眼内炎病原体对万古霉素和头孢他啶敏感。鉴于此,如果获得眼内标本会延误玻璃体内抗生素的及时治疗,则可以推迟。新兴的培养技术有望更快速、更敏感地识别病原体,这可能会改变培养指南的格局,提高临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信