{"title":"Management of endophthalmitis: to culture or not to culture?","authors":"Annika G Samuelson, Samir N Patel, Sunir J Garg","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review the role of microbial cultures in managing endophthalmitis following cataract surgery and intravitreal injections.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The endophthalmitis vitrectomy study (EVS) continues to guide the management of endophthalmitis including its recommendation for intraocular vitreous sampling. Vitreous cultures have better diagnostic yield than aqueous cultures. Advances in culture techniques have improved the efficiency and sensitivity of pathogen identification. While culture results are useful for prognostication, microbiology data rarely changes management in endophthalmitis following cataract surgery or intravitreal injections. Endophthalmitis managed without microbial cultures had similar outcomes to eyes managed with microbial cultures.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Despite advances in culture techniques, most institutions still rely on gram stain and microbial cultures, often requiring several days for results. Initial administration of empiric antibiotics occurs before microbiology data becomes available, limiting the utility of cultures in clinical management. Despite concerns for antibiotic resistance, the large majority of postcataract surgery and postintravitreal injection endophthalmitis pathogens are susceptible to vancomycin and ceftazidime. Given this, obtaining intraocular specimens can be deferred if it poses a delay to prompt treatment with intravitreal antibiotics. Emerging culture techniques hold promise for more rapid and sensitive pathogen identification, which could change the landscape of culture guidelines and improve clinical usefulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To review the role of microbial cultures in managing endophthalmitis following cataract surgery and intravitreal injections.
Recent findings: The endophthalmitis vitrectomy study (EVS) continues to guide the management of endophthalmitis including its recommendation for intraocular vitreous sampling. Vitreous cultures have better diagnostic yield than aqueous cultures. Advances in culture techniques have improved the efficiency and sensitivity of pathogen identification. While culture results are useful for prognostication, microbiology data rarely changes management in endophthalmitis following cataract surgery or intravitreal injections. Endophthalmitis managed without microbial cultures had similar outcomes to eyes managed with microbial cultures.
Summary: Despite advances in culture techniques, most institutions still rely on gram stain and microbial cultures, often requiring several days for results. Initial administration of empiric antibiotics occurs before microbiology data becomes available, limiting the utility of cultures in clinical management. Despite concerns for antibiotic resistance, the large majority of postcataract surgery and postintravitreal injection endophthalmitis pathogens are susceptible to vancomycin and ceftazidime. Given this, obtaining intraocular specimens can be deferred if it poses a delay to prompt treatment with intravitreal antibiotics. Emerging culture techniques hold promise for more rapid and sensitive pathogen identification, which could change the landscape of culture guidelines and improve clinical usefulness.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.