Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Argatroban as an Adjunct to Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Yousr Ahmed, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Gulnaz Bahtiyarova, Younes Nabgouri, Mohammed Elkholy, Reham M Wagih, Ibrahim Serag, Ibraheem M Alkhawaldeh, Mohamed Abouzid, Mahmoud Elsayed
{"title":"Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Argatroban as an Adjunct to Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yousr Ahmed, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Gulnaz Bahtiyarova, Younes Nabgouri, Mohammed Elkholy, Reham M Wagih, Ibrahim Serag, Ibraheem M Alkhawaldeh, Mohamed Abouzid, Mahmoud Elsayed","doi":"10.1007/s12975-025-01357-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. While antiplatelet therapy is standard for secondary prevention, many patients still experience early neurological deterioration (END). Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, can potentially limit thrombus progression and improve AIS's functional outcomes. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of argatroban in combination with single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to antiplatelets alone. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating argatroban plus antiplatelets versus antiplatelets alone in AIS patients were included. The primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0-2. Secondary outcomes included mRS 0-1 and mRS 3-5 at 90 days, END, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) improvement, stroke recurrence, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. We used the mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous ones at 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a P-value of 0.05. A total of 14 studies (four RCTs and 10 cohort studies) were included. Compared to antiplatelets alone, argatroban significantly improved functional outcomes, increasing the incidence of mRS 0-2 (OR = 1.36 [95%CI: 1.05, 1.76, P = 0.02]) and mRS 0-1 (OR = 1.54 [95%CI: 1.08, 2.2, P = 0.02]) while reducing END (OR = 0.42 [95%CI: 0.21, 0.85, P = 0.02]). Argatroban was also associated with greater NIHSS score improvement (MD = - 0.52 [95%CI: - 0.89, - 0.15, P = 0.005]). No significant differences were observed in mRS 3-5, stroke recurrence, ICH, sICH, or mortality. Subgroup analysis indicated that argatroban combined with DAPT showed the greatest benefits. Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy improves functional recovery and reduces END without increasing bleeding risks. These findings support its use, particularly with DAPT, in mild to moderate AIS management. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to optimize dosing strategies and patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-025-01357-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. While antiplatelet therapy is standard for secondary prevention, many patients still experience early neurological deterioration (END). Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, can potentially limit thrombus progression and improve AIS's functional outcomes. This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of argatroban in combination with single (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared to antiplatelets alone. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating argatroban plus antiplatelets versus antiplatelets alone in AIS patients were included. The primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0-2. Secondary outcomes included mRS 0-1 and mRS 3-5 at 90 days, END, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) improvement, stroke recurrence, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. We used the mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous ones at 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a P-value of 0.05. A total of 14 studies (four RCTs and 10 cohort studies) were included. Compared to antiplatelets alone, argatroban significantly improved functional outcomes, increasing the incidence of mRS 0-2 (OR = 1.36 [95%CI: 1.05, 1.76, P = 0.02]) and mRS 0-1 (OR = 1.54 [95%CI: 1.08, 2.2, P = 0.02]) while reducing END (OR = 0.42 [95%CI: 0.21, 0.85, P = 0.02]). Argatroban was also associated with greater NIHSS score improvement (MD = - 0.52 [95%CI: - 0.89, - 0.15, P = 0.005]). No significant differences were observed in mRS 3-5, stroke recurrence, ICH, sICH, or mortality. Subgroup analysis indicated that argatroban combined with DAPT showed the greatest benefits. Argatroban combined with antiplatelet therapy improves functional recovery and reduces END without increasing bleeding risks. These findings support its use, particularly with DAPT, in mild to moderate AIS management. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to optimize dosing strategies and patient selection.
期刊介绍:
Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma.
Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.