Development and Initial Validation of the Multi-dimensional Attention Rating Scale in Highly Educated Adults.

Q2 Medicine
Xin-Yang Zhang, Karen Spruyt, Jia-Yue Si, Lin-Lin Zhang, Ting-Ting Wu, Yan-Nan Liu, Di-Ga Gan, Yu-Xin Hu, Si-Yu Liu, Teng Gao, Yi Zhong, Yao Ge, Zhe Li, Zi-Yan Lin, Yan-Ping Bao, Xue-Qin Wang, Yu-Feng Wang, Lin Lu
{"title":"Development and Initial Validation of the Multi-dimensional Attention Rating Scale in Highly Educated Adults.","authors":"Xin-Yang Zhang, Karen Spruyt, Jia-Yue Si, Lin-Lin Zhang, Ting-Ting Wu, Yan-Nan Liu, Di-Ga Gan, Yu-Xin Hu, Si-Yu Liu, Teng Gao, Yi Zhong, Yao Ge, Zhe Li, Zi-Yan Lin, Yan-Ping Bao, Xue-Qin Wang, Yu-Feng Wang, Lin Lu","doi":"10.24920/004481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report the development, validation, and findings of the Multi-dimensional Attention Rating Scale (MARS), a self-report tool crafted to evaluate six-dimension attention levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MARS was developed based on Classical Test Theory (CTT) , with initial item selection and content validation conducted by six experts in psychiatry and psychology using the Delphi method. Healthy adult participants were recruited to complete the MARS and related scales, along with on-site measures. Reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability. Structural validity was explored using principal component analysis. Criterion validity was analyzed by correlating MARS scores with the Toronto Hospital Alertness Test (THAT), the Attentional Control Scale (ACS), and the Attention Networks Test (ANT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MARS comprises 12 items spanning six distinct dimensions of attention: focused attention, sustained attention, shifting attention, selective attention, divided attention, and response inhibition. Cronbach's alpha for the MARS was 0.78, with test-retest reliability of 0.81. Four factors were identified (cumulative variance 68.79%). The content validity was evaluated by six experts, yielding an average content validity index (CVI) of 0.95. The MARS was correlated positively with THAT (<i>r</i> = 0.60, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and ACS (<i>r</i> = 0.78, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and negatively with ANT's reaction time (RT) alerting measure (<i>r</i> = -0.31, <i>P</i> = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MARS can reliably and validly assess six-dimension attention levels in real-world settings and is expected to be a new tool for assessing various attention impairments in different mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":35615,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24920/004481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To report the development, validation, and findings of the Multi-dimensional Attention Rating Scale (MARS), a self-report tool crafted to evaluate six-dimension attention levels.

Methods: The MARS was developed based on Classical Test Theory (CTT) , with initial item selection and content validation conducted by six experts in psychiatry and psychology using the Delphi method. Healthy adult participants were recruited to complete the MARS and related scales, along with on-site measures. Reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability. Structural validity was explored using principal component analysis. Criterion validity was analyzed by correlating MARS scores with the Toronto Hospital Alertness Test (THAT), the Attentional Control Scale (ACS), and the Attention Networks Test (ANT).

Results: The MARS comprises 12 items spanning six distinct dimensions of attention: focused attention, sustained attention, shifting attention, selective attention, divided attention, and response inhibition. Cronbach's alpha for the MARS was 0.78, with test-retest reliability of 0.81. Four factors were identified (cumulative variance 68.79%). The content validity was evaluated by six experts, yielding an average content validity index (CVI) of 0.95. The MARS was correlated positively with THAT (r = 0.60, P < 0.01) and ACS (r = 0.78, P < 0.01) and negatively with ANT's reaction time (RT) alerting measure (r = -0.31, P = 0.049).

Conclusions: The MARS can reliably and validly assess six-dimension attention levels in real-world settings and is expected to be a new tool for assessing various attention impairments in different mental disorders.

高学历成人多维注意力评定量表的编制与初步验证。
目的:报告多维注意力评定量表(MARS)的开发、验证和发现,这是一种评估六维注意力水平的自我报告工具。方法:根据经典测试理论(CTT)编制MARS问卷,由6名精神病学和心理学专家采用德尔菲法进行初步项目选择和内容验证。招募健康成人参与者完成MARS和相关量表,并进行现场测量。信度采用Cronbach’s alpha和重测信度测量。采用主成分分析探讨结构效度。通过将MARS评分与多伦多医院警觉性测试(THAT)、注意控制量表(ACS)和注意网络测试(ANT)相关联来分析标准效度。结果:MARS包括12个项目,跨越6个不同的注意维度:集中注意、持续注意、转移注意、选择注意、分离注意和反应抑制。MARS的Cronbach's alpha为0.78,重测信度为0.81。确定了4个因素(累积方差68.79%)。内容效度由6位专家进行评估,得出的平均内容效度指数(CVI)为0.95。MARS与THAT (r = 0.60, P < 0.01)、ACS (r = 0.78, P < 0.01)呈正相关(r = -0.31, P = 0.049),与ANT反应时间(RT)报警指标呈负相关(r = -0.31, P = 0.049)。结论:MARS能够可靠、有效地评估现实环境下的六维注意水平,有望成为评估不同精神障碍患者各种注意缺陷的新工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1275
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信