{"title":"Spectral and network investigation reveals distinct power and connectivity patterns between phasic and tonic REM sleep.","authors":"Tamir Avigdor, Laure Peter-Derex, Alyssa Ho, Katharina Schiller, Yingqi Wang, Chifaou Abdallah, Edouard Delaire, Kassem Jaber, Vojtech Travnicek, Christophe Grova, Birgit Frauscher","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is often thought of as a singular state, it consists of two substates, phasic and tonic REM, defined by the presence (respectively absence) of bursts of rapid eye movements. These two substates have distinct EEG signatures and functional properties. However, whether they exhibit regional specificities remains unknown. Using intracranial EEG recordings from 31 patients, we analyzed expert labeled segments from tonic and phasic REM and contrasted them with wakefulness segments. We assessed the spectral and connectivity content of these segments using Welch's method to estimate power spectral density and the phase locking value to assess functional connectivity. Overall, we found a widespread power gradient between low and high frequencies (p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.17± 0.20), with tonic REM being dominated by lower frequencies (p < 0.01, d = 0.18 ± 0.08), and phasic REM by higher frequencies (p < 0.01, d = 0.18 ± 0.19). However, some regions such as the occipito-temporal areas as well as medial frontal regions exhibit opposite trends. Connectivity was overall higher in all bands except in the low and high ripple frequency band in most networks during tonic REM (p < 0.01, d = 0.08 ± 0.09) compared to phasic REM. Yet, functional connections involving the visual network were always stronger during phasic REM when compared to tonic REM. These findings highlight the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of REM sleep which is consistent with the concept of focal sleep in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf133","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is often thought of as a singular state, it consists of two substates, phasic and tonic REM, defined by the presence (respectively absence) of bursts of rapid eye movements. These two substates have distinct EEG signatures and functional properties. However, whether they exhibit regional specificities remains unknown. Using intracranial EEG recordings from 31 patients, we analyzed expert labeled segments from tonic and phasic REM and contrasted them with wakefulness segments. We assessed the spectral and connectivity content of these segments using Welch's method to estimate power spectral density and the phase locking value to assess functional connectivity. Overall, we found a widespread power gradient between low and high frequencies (p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.17± 0.20), with tonic REM being dominated by lower frequencies (p < 0.01, d = 0.18 ± 0.08), and phasic REM by higher frequencies (p < 0.01, d = 0.18 ± 0.19). However, some regions such as the occipito-temporal areas as well as medial frontal regions exhibit opposite trends. Connectivity was overall higher in all bands except in the low and high ripple frequency band in most networks during tonic REM (p < 0.01, d = 0.08 ± 0.09) compared to phasic REM. Yet, functional connections involving the visual network were always stronger during phasic REM when compared to tonic REM. These findings highlight the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of REM sleep which is consistent with the concept of focal sleep in humans.
期刊介绍:
SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including:
Genes
Molecules
Cells
Physiology
Neural systems and circuits
Behavior and cognition
Self-report
SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to:
Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms
In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders
Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms
Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease
Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.