Effects of organic, non organic fertilizers, and selected novel pesticides on survival of two Entomopathogenic nematodes.

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Brazilian Journal of Biology Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1519-6984.291916
Z M Al Dhafar, M A Abdel Razik, M A Osman, M E Sweelam
{"title":"Effects of organic, non organic fertilizers, and selected novel pesticides on survival of two Entomopathogenic nematodes.","authors":"Z M Al Dhafar, M A Abdel Razik, M A Osman, M E Sweelam","doi":"10.1590/1519-6984.291916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, the effect of six macro fertilizers i.e. urea, ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, NPK, NP & DAP, and three micro elements i.e. Zn, Mn, and Fe at different concentrations as well as eight novel pesticides, thiamethoxam, spinetoram, azoxystrobin, chlorfenpyr, chlorantraniliprole, novaluron, lambda-cyhalothrin and avaunt at field recommended rate on two entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs): Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora were determined under laboratory conditions. The obtained results reported that S. carpocapsae was more tolerant to NPK; NP and DAP macro fertilizers than H. bacteriophora, showed the lowest mortality percentages (12.63, 9.47and12.63%), (15.79, 13.68 and 31.58%) and (20.21, 30.85 and 34.04%) at three tested concentrations (1g/liter water, 5g/liter water and10g/liter water), respectively. All tested micro fertilizers (Zn, Mn, and Fe) were lethal for two EPNs and induced 94.85, 100, 100 mortality % after five days of exposure. The morality percent increased as the concentration of fertilizers increased. With respect to tested pesticides, the mortality percentages of two EPN were ranged between 2.67-23.67% for S. carpocapsae and 3.33-18.33% for H. bacteriophora after five days of exposure. The tested macro fertilizers such as DAP, NP and NPK can be used safely at tested concentrations (5-10 g/ liter water) with Steinernema carpocapsae. All tested macro fertilizers cannot be used with Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. All micro fertilizers could be used with two EPNs. All tested pesticides can be successfully used for integrated plant protection systems. EPNs are tolerant to the tested pesticides and the tank-mix application is possible in most compounds except Lambda cyhalothrin which significantly reduced the virulence of tested nematodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55326,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","volume":"85 ","pages":"e291916"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.291916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, the effect of six macro fertilizers i.e. urea, ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, NPK, NP & DAP, and three micro elements i.e. Zn, Mn, and Fe at different concentrations as well as eight novel pesticides, thiamethoxam, spinetoram, azoxystrobin, chlorfenpyr, chlorantraniliprole, novaluron, lambda-cyhalothrin and avaunt at field recommended rate on two entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs): Steinernema carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora were determined under laboratory conditions. The obtained results reported that S. carpocapsae was more tolerant to NPK; NP and DAP macro fertilizers than H. bacteriophora, showed the lowest mortality percentages (12.63, 9.47and12.63%), (15.79, 13.68 and 31.58%) and (20.21, 30.85 and 34.04%) at three tested concentrations (1g/liter water, 5g/liter water and10g/liter water), respectively. All tested micro fertilizers (Zn, Mn, and Fe) were lethal for two EPNs and induced 94.85, 100, 100 mortality % after five days of exposure. The morality percent increased as the concentration of fertilizers increased. With respect to tested pesticides, the mortality percentages of two EPN were ranged between 2.67-23.67% for S. carpocapsae and 3.33-18.33% for H. bacteriophora after five days of exposure. The tested macro fertilizers such as DAP, NP and NPK can be used safely at tested concentrations (5-10 g/ liter water) with Steinernema carpocapsae. All tested macro fertilizers cannot be used with Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. All micro fertilizers could be used with two EPNs. All tested pesticides can be successfully used for integrated plant protection systems. EPNs are tolerant to the tested pesticides and the tank-mix application is possible in most compounds except Lambda cyhalothrin which significantly reduced the virulence of tested nematodes.

有机肥、非有机肥和精选新型农药对两种昆虫病原线虫存活的影响。
本研究采用尿素、硫酸铵、硝酸铵、NPK、NP、DAP等6种宏量肥料和不同浓度的Zn、Mn、Fe 3种微量元素,以及噻虫嗪、spinetoram、嘧菌酯、氯虫腈、氯氰菊酯、高效氯氰菊酯和avaunt等8种新型农药对2种昆虫病原线虫(epn)的防治效果。在实验室条件下对荚膜斯坦纳菌和噬菌体异habditis进行了检测。结果表明,油菜对氮磷钾的耐受性较强;在1g/升水、5g/升水和10g/升水3种浓度下,NP和DAP宏肥的致死率分别为12.63、9.47和12.63%、15.79、13.68和31.58%和20.21、30.85和34.04%,均低于食蚜杆菌。所有微量肥料(Zn、Mn和Fe)对2种epn均有致死作用,暴露5天后死亡率分别为94.85%、100%和100%。随着肥料浓度的增加,道德百分比也随之增加。暴露5 d后,两种EPN的致死率分别在2.67 ~ 23.67%和3.33 ~ 18.33%之间。经试验的DAP、NP、NPK等宏观肥料在试验浓度(5 ~ 10 g/ l水)下可与豆荚斯坦纳马一起安全使用。所有被试的宏观肥料都不能与嗜杆菌异芽孢杆菌一起使用。所有微肥均可与2个epn配合施用。所有经过测试的农药都可以成功地用于综合植物保护系统。epn对所测试的农药具有耐受性,除显著降低所测试线虫的毒力的氯氟氰菊酯外,大多数化合物都可以采用罐式混合施用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
301
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The BJB – Brazilian Journal of Biology® is a scientific journal devoted to publishing original articles in all fields of the Biological Sciences, i.e., General Biology, Cell Biology, Evolution, Biological Oceanography, Taxonomy, Geographic Distribution, Limnology, Aquatic Biology, Botany, Zoology, Genetics, and Ecology. Priority is given to papers presenting results of researches in the Neotropical region. Material published includes research papers, review papers (upon approval of the Editorial Board), notes, book reviews, and comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信