The trigger mechanism of the target detection task influencing recognition memory at Stimulus Onset Asynchrony of 0.5 s: evidence from the remember-know paradigm.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Chenyang Shang, Meng Sun, Qin Zhang
{"title":"The trigger mechanism of the target detection task influencing recognition memory at Stimulus Onset Asynchrony of 0.5 s: evidence from the remember-know paradigm.","authors":"Chenyang Shang, Meng Sun, Qin Zhang","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2025.2504594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals showed better memory performance for target-paired items compared to distractor-paired items during sequential target detection and memory encoding tasks, a phenomenon called target-paired memory enhancement (TPME). The TPME was considered to be triggered by the response when the detection stimulus preceded the memory item by 0.5 s without temporal overlap. However, this hypothesis has not been empirically verified. To test the hypothesis, we instructed participants to detect the target colour before memorizing words, varying the response requirements for the target colour across different tasks. Participants responded only to the target colour in the Go-target-0.5 s task (SOA = 0.5 s) and Go-target-1 s task (SOA = 1 s), to distractor colours in the No-Go-target task, and to all colours with different keys in the response-choice task. The results of the remember-know recognition test showed that TPME was consistent across all tasks for R responses, but only occurred in the Go-target-0.5 s task for corrected K responses. These results suggested that both target detection and response can independently contribute to TPME when the detection stimulus and the memory item were presented successively without temporal overlap. The target detection enhanced recollection and familiarity, while the response enhanced familiarity. The effect on recollection was lasting, while the effect on familiarity was transient.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2025.2504594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals showed better memory performance for target-paired items compared to distractor-paired items during sequential target detection and memory encoding tasks, a phenomenon called target-paired memory enhancement (TPME). The TPME was considered to be triggered by the response when the detection stimulus preceded the memory item by 0.5 s without temporal overlap. However, this hypothesis has not been empirically verified. To test the hypothesis, we instructed participants to detect the target colour before memorizing words, varying the response requirements for the target colour across different tasks. Participants responded only to the target colour in the Go-target-0.5 s task (SOA = 0.5 s) and Go-target-1 s task (SOA = 1 s), to distractor colours in the No-Go-target task, and to all colours with different keys in the response-choice task. The results of the remember-know recognition test showed that TPME was consistent across all tasks for R responses, but only occurred in the Go-target-0.5 s task for corrected K responses. These results suggested that both target detection and response can independently contribute to TPME when the detection stimulus and the memory item were presented successively without temporal overlap. The target detection enhanced recollection and familiarity, while the response enhanced familiarity. The effect on recollection was lasting, while the effect on familiarity was transient.

刺激启动非同步0.5 s时目标检测任务影响识别记忆的触发机制:来自记忆-认知范式的证据。
在顺序目标检测和记忆编码任务中,个体对目标配对项目的记忆表现优于对干扰物配对项目的记忆,这种现象被称为目标配对记忆增强(TPME)。当检测刺激先于记忆项目0.5 s且无时间重叠时,TPME被认为是由反应触发的。然而,这一假设尚未得到实证验证。为了验证这一假设,我们指示参与者在记忆单词之前检测目标颜色,并在不同的任务中改变对目标颜色的反应要求。参与者只对目标-0.5秒任务(SOA = 0.5秒)和目标-1秒任务(SOA = 1秒)中的目标颜色做出反应,对无目标任务中的干扰颜色做出反应,对反应-选择任务中所有不同键的颜色做出反应。记忆-认知识别测试结果表明,TPME在所有R反应任务中都是一致的,但只在纠正K反应的Go-target-0.5 s任务中出现。这些结果表明,当检测刺激和记忆项目在时间上不重叠时,目标检测和反应都可以独立地贡献TPME。目标检测增强了记忆和熟悉度,而反应增强了熟悉度。对回忆的影响是持久的,而对熟悉的影响是短暂的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信