Tatiana Chamba DDS , Camila Falconí-Páez DDS, MS , Alejandra Nuñez DDS, MS, PhD , Camilo Pulido DDS, MS, PhD , Paulina Aliaga-Sancho DDS , Newton Fahl Jr DDS, MS , Cesar Augusto Galvão Arrais DDS, MS, PhD , Andrés Dávila-Sánchez DDS, MS, PhD
{"title":"Effect of using a self-etching primer to repair resinous CAD-CAM materials: An in vitro study","authors":"Tatiana Chamba DDS , Camila Falconí-Páez DDS, MS , Alejandra Nuñez DDS, MS, PhD , Camilo Pulido DDS, MS, PhD , Paulina Aliaga-Sancho DDS , Newton Fahl Jr DDS, MS , Cesar Augusto Galvão Arrais DDS, MS, PhD , Andrés Dávila-Sánchez DDS, MS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>A consensus is lacking regarding the optimal surface treatment for repair protocols that ensures reliable bonding to computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) resin composite in intraoral applications.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div><span>The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the microshear bond </span>strength promoted by 3 bonding strategies to repair commercially available CAD-CAM resin composites.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Three CAD-CAM resin composites (Cerasmart, Brilliant, Tetric CAD) and a hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic) were pre-aged for 5000 thermal cycles and allocated into groups according to surface repair treatments: hydrofluoric acid<span><span> etch, silane<span>, and Monobond Etch & Prime, airborne-particle abrasion and Monobond Etch & Prime, or only Monobond Etch & Prime. Transparent Ø8×0.5-mm polyethylene tubes were placed on the treated surfaces and were filled with flowable resin composite. Half of the specimens (n=4) were microshear bond strength tested after 24 hours and the other half after thermal cycle testing, and the </span></span>surface topography was examined. Data were analyzed with 2-way repeated measures ANOVA and the Bonferroni test (α=.05)</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After 24 hours, for the Cerasmart, Tetric CAD, and Brilliant resin specimens, the Monobond Etch & Prime strategy presented the lowest microshear bond strength values (<em>P<</em>.003). In the Vita Enamic group, no differences were found among groups after 24 hours. After 10 000 cycles, values decreased in all groups (<em>P</em><.05). The airborne-particle abrasion with Monobond Etch & Prime strategy promoted the highest values.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Airborne-particle abrasion combined with a single component self-etching primer provided a simplified clinical alternative for repairing resin-containing CAD-CAM materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"134 3","pages":"Pages 843.e1-843.e10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391325004032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem
A consensus is lacking regarding the optimal surface treatment for repair protocols that ensures reliable bonding to computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) resin composite in intraoral applications.
Purpose
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the microshear bond strength promoted by 3 bonding strategies to repair commercially available CAD-CAM resin composites.
Material and methods
Three CAD-CAM resin composites (Cerasmart, Brilliant, Tetric CAD) and a hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic) were pre-aged for 5000 thermal cycles and allocated into groups according to surface repair treatments: hydrofluoric acid etch, silane, and Monobond Etch & Prime, airborne-particle abrasion and Monobond Etch & Prime, or only Monobond Etch & Prime. Transparent Ø8×0.5-mm polyethylene tubes were placed on the treated surfaces and were filled with flowable resin composite. Half of the specimens (n=4) were microshear bond strength tested after 24 hours and the other half after thermal cycle testing, and the surface topography was examined. Data were analyzed with 2-way repeated measures ANOVA and the Bonferroni test (α=.05)
Results
After 24 hours, for the Cerasmart, Tetric CAD, and Brilliant resin specimens, the Monobond Etch & Prime strategy presented the lowest microshear bond strength values (P<.003). In the Vita Enamic group, no differences were found among groups after 24 hours. After 10 000 cycles, values decreased in all groups (P<.05). The airborne-particle abrasion with Monobond Etch & Prime strategy promoted the highest values.
Conclusions
Airborne-particle abrasion combined with a single component self-etching primer provided a simplified clinical alternative for repairing resin-containing CAD-CAM materials.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.