Basma Magdy ElKholy, Samia Ali Ebrahim, Mai Ali Othman Sobh, Rania Alakad, Heba Allah Mohamed Hoseiny
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Aluminum Chloride, Oxybutynin Chloride, and Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis.","authors":"Basma Magdy ElKholy, Samia Ali Ebrahim, Mai Ali Othman Sobh, Rania Alakad, Heba Allah Mohamed Hoseiny","doi":"10.1177/12034754251336233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary hyperhidrosis (HH) is a common challenging problem. Different treatment modalities are present with no clear evidence favoring one modality over the others.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess and compare the efficacy of aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH), oxybutynin chloride, and botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) in treating primary focal HH.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Sixty-six patients of both sexes, with primary HH, were equally and randomly divided into 3 groups. Group (A) received a single session of intradermal (BTX-A), Group (B) received topical application of ACH lotion 25% once daily, and Group (C) received oral oxybutynin chloride 10 mg daily for 3 months. The clinical response was assessed using the Hyperhidrosis Severity Scale (HDSS) and the patients were followed up for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3 modalities were effective and safe in the treatment of primary HH, but the clinical response was significantly higher in the BTX-A group (81.8% excellent response) compared to the other 2 modalities. The reduction of hyperhidrosis was also maintained for a longer period in the BTX-A group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the 3 modalities, BTX-A was associated with a higher reduction of HDSS scores. A single session was sufficient; however, pain and high cost are limiting factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"12034754251336233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754251336233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Primary hyperhidrosis (HH) is a common challenging problem. Different treatment modalities are present with no clear evidence favoring one modality over the others.
Objectives: To assess and compare the efficacy of aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH), oxybutynin chloride, and botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) in treating primary focal HH.
Patients and methods: Sixty-six patients of both sexes, with primary HH, were equally and randomly divided into 3 groups. Group (A) received a single session of intradermal (BTX-A), Group (B) received topical application of ACH lotion 25% once daily, and Group (C) received oral oxybutynin chloride 10 mg daily for 3 months. The clinical response was assessed using the Hyperhidrosis Severity Scale (HDSS) and the patients were followed up for 6 months.
Results: The 3 modalities were effective and safe in the treatment of primary HH, but the clinical response was significantly higher in the BTX-A group (81.8% excellent response) compared to the other 2 modalities. The reduction of hyperhidrosis was also maintained for a longer period in the BTX-A group.
Conclusion: Among the 3 modalities, BTX-A was associated with a higher reduction of HDSS scores. A single session was sufficient; however, pain and high cost are limiting factors.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (JCMS) aims to reflect the state of the art in cutaneous biology and dermatology by providing original scientific writings, as well as a complete critical review of the dermatology literature for clinicians, trainees, and academicians. JCMS endeavours to bring readers cutting edge dermatologic information in two distinct formats. Part of each issue features scholarly research and articles on issues of basic and applied science, insightful case reports, comprehensive continuing medical education, and in depth reviews, all of which provide theoretical framework for practitioners to make sound practical decisions. The evolving field of dermatology is highlighted through these articles. In addition, part of each issue is dedicated to making the most important developments in dermatology easily accessible to the clinician by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information in a format that is interesting, clearly presented, and useful to patient care.