Deep learning predicts microsatellite instability status in colorectal carcinoma in an ethnically heterogeneous population in South Africa.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Alessandro Pietro Aldera, Didem Cifci, Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen, Wan-Jung Tsai, Komala Pillay, Adam Boutall, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Raj Ramesar
{"title":"Deep learning predicts microsatellite instability status in colorectal carcinoma in an ethnically heterogeneous population in South Africa.","authors":"Alessandro Pietro Aldera, Didem Cifci, Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen, Wan-Jung Tsai, Komala Pillay, Adam Boutall, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Raj Ramesar","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2025-210053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning (DL) models are effective pre-screening tools for detecting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). These models have been trained and validated on large cohorts from the Northern Hemisphere, without representation of African samples. We sought to determine the performance of a DL model in an ethnically heterogeneous cohort of patients from South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our cohort comprised 197 CRC resection specimens, with scanned whole slide images tessellated and inputted into a transformer-based DL model trained on large international cohorts. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity. The maximal Youden's J index was calculated to determine the optimal cut-off threshold for the model prediction score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our model yielded an AUROC of 0.91 (±0.05). Using a prediction score threshold of 0.620 produced an overall sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI 73.3% to 92.9%) and a specificity of 82.4% (95% CI 75.5% to 87.7%). The false negative cases were predominantly left-sided (71.4%) and did not show the typical dMMR/microsatellite instability-high histological phenotype. Sensitivity was lower (50%-75%) in cases showing isolated PMS2 or MSH6 loss of staining. Calibrating the classification threshold to 0.470, the sensitivity was optimised to 95.6% (95% CI 86.3% to 98.9%) with a specificity of 69.6% (95% CI 61.8% to 76.4%). This would have resulted in excluding 103 cases (52.3%) from downstream immunohistochemical (IHC) or molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following appropriate region-specific calibration, we have shown that this model could be employed to accurately prescreen for dMMR in CRC, thereby reducing the burden of downstream IHC and molecular testing in a resource-limited setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2025-210053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deep learning (DL) models are effective pre-screening tools for detecting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). These models have been trained and validated on large cohorts from the Northern Hemisphere, without representation of African samples. We sought to determine the performance of a DL model in an ethnically heterogeneous cohort of patients from South Africa.

Methods: Our cohort comprised 197 CRC resection specimens, with scanned whole slide images tessellated and inputted into a transformer-based DL model trained on large international cohorts. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and specificity. The maximal Youden's J index was calculated to determine the optimal cut-off threshold for the model prediction score.

Results: Our model yielded an AUROC of 0.91 (±0.05). Using a prediction score threshold of 0.620 produced an overall sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI 73.3% to 92.9%) and a specificity of 82.4% (95% CI 75.5% to 87.7%). The false negative cases were predominantly left-sided (71.4%) and did not show the typical dMMR/microsatellite instability-high histological phenotype. Sensitivity was lower (50%-75%) in cases showing isolated PMS2 or MSH6 loss of staining. Calibrating the classification threshold to 0.470, the sensitivity was optimised to 95.6% (95% CI 86.3% to 98.9%) with a specificity of 69.6% (95% CI 61.8% to 76.4%). This would have resulted in excluding 103 cases (52.3%) from downstream immunohistochemical (IHC) or molecular testing.

Conclusions: Following appropriate region-specific calibration, we have shown that this model could be employed to accurately prescreen for dMMR in CRC, thereby reducing the burden of downstream IHC and molecular testing in a resource-limited setting.

深度学习预测南非种族异质性人群结直肠癌的微卫星不稳定状态。
背景:深度学习(DL)模型是检测结直肠癌(CRC)错配修复缺陷(dMMR)的有效预筛选工具。这些模型已经在北半球的大型队列中进行了训练和验证,但没有代表非洲样本。我们试图确定DL模型在南非异种种族患者队列中的表现。方法:我们的队列包括197例CRC切除标本,扫描的整个切片图像被细分,并输入到基于变压器的DL模型中,该模型是在大型国际队列中训练的。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、敏感性和特异性评价模型的性能。计算最大约登J指数,确定模型预测分数的最优截止阈值。结果:模型的AUROC为0.91(±0.05)。使用0.620的预测评分阈值,总敏感性为85.7% (95% CI 73.3%至92.9%),特异性为82.4% (95% CI 75.5%至87.7%)。假阴性病例以左侧为主(71.4%),未表现出典型的dMMR/微卫星不稳定-高组织学表型。在分离的PMS2或MSH6染色丢失的病例中,敏感性较低(50%-75%)。将分类阈值校准为0.470,灵敏度优化为95.6% (95% CI 86.3%至98.9%),特异性为69.6% (95% CI 61.8%至76.4%)。这将导致103例(52.3%)患者从下游免疫组化(IHC)或分子检测中被排除。结论:经过适当的区域特异性校准,我们已经证明该模型可以用于准确地预筛选CRC中的dMMR,从而在资源有限的情况下减轻下游IHC和分子检测的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信