Impact of Judicious Fluid Administration in the Setting of Abdominally Based Free Flaps.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Lyndsay A Kandi, Nicole Van Spronsen, W Nicholas Jungbauer, Jaime Sexton, Nellie Movtchan, Yu-Hui Chang, Edward Reece, Alanna M Rebecca, William J Casey
{"title":"Impact of Judicious Fluid Administration in the Setting of Abdominally Based Free Flaps.","authors":"Lyndsay A Kandi, Nicole Van Spronsen, W Nicholas Jungbauer, Jaime Sexton, Nellie Movtchan, Yu-Hui Chang, Edward Reece, Alanna M Rebecca, William J Casey","doi":"10.1055/a-2616-4598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abdominally based free flaps are commonly utilized in the context of breast reconstruction. Historically, postoperative care of these patients involved liberal amounts of intravenous fluid administration; however, overadministration of fluids puts patients at risk of developing flap edema via fluid shifts, electrolyte imbalances, wound dehiscence, and other sequelae. The purpose of this study is to assess fluid administration trends in this cohort at the authors' institution and assess its impact on patient outcomes.A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent free-flap breast reconstruction. Patient demographics and hospitalization data were collected, and type of abdominal flap and reconstruction timing was noted. Perioperative fluid administration volumes were tracked, and primary outcomes included complication rate and type (e.g., acute blood loss anemia [ABLA], partial/total flap loss, etc.). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of fluid volume on patient outcomes.A total of 115 patients (mean age of 51.3 ± 10.5 years) underwent 188 abdominally based free flaps. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps were performed most often (<i>n</i> = 91), followed by muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis flaps (<i>n</i> = 88). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that high perioperative fluid administration (≥9,000 mL) was associated with increased odds of medical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 21.7; confidence interval [CI]: 5.54-84.5; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients with high fluid administration volumes experienced an increased (but nonstatistically significant) flap complication rate (OR = 2.96; CI: 0.89-9.88; <i>p</i> = 0.08) and developed ABLA at a higher rate (OR = 15.86; CI: 5.30-46.4; <i>p</i> < 0.001).High-volume resuscitation (≥9,000 mL) was associated with increased odds of ABLA as well as a greater likelihood of medical and flap complications in patients undergoing abdominally based free flaps for breast reconstruction. These data should be used to guide the development of protocols within institutions, which perform free flaps for breast reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2616-4598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abdominally based free flaps are commonly utilized in the context of breast reconstruction. Historically, postoperative care of these patients involved liberal amounts of intravenous fluid administration; however, overadministration of fluids puts patients at risk of developing flap edema via fluid shifts, electrolyte imbalances, wound dehiscence, and other sequelae. The purpose of this study is to assess fluid administration trends in this cohort at the authors' institution and assess its impact on patient outcomes.A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent free-flap breast reconstruction. Patient demographics and hospitalization data were collected, and type of abdominal flap and reconstruction timing was noted. Perioperative fluid administration volumes were tracked, and primary outcomes included complication rate and type (e.g., acute blood loss anemia [ABLA], partial/total flap loss, etc.). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of fluid volume on patient outcomes.A total of 115 patients (mean age of 51.3 ± 10.5 years) underwent 188 abdominally based free flaps. Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps were performed most often (n = 91), followed by muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis flaps (n = 88). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that high perioperative fluid administration (≥9,000 mL) was associated with increased odds of medical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 21.7; confidence interval [CI]: 5.54-84.5; p < 0.001). Patients with high fluid administration volumes experienced an increased (but nonstatistically significant) flap complication rate (OR = 2.96; CI: 0.89-9.88; p = 0.08) and developed ABLA at a higher rate (OR = 15.86; CI: 5.30-46.4; p < 0.001).High-volume resuscitation (≥9,000 mL) was associated with increased odds of ABLA as well as a greater likelihood of medical and flap complications in patients undergoing abdominally based free flaps for breast reconstruction. These data should be used to guide the development of protocols within institutions, which perform free flaps for breast reconstruction.

合理给液对腹部游离皮瓣设置的影响。
背景:以腹部为基础的游离皮瓣在乳房重建中被广泛使用。从历史上看,这些患者的术后护理包括大量静脉输液;然而,过多的液体给药会使患者面临因液体移位、电解质失衡、伤口开裂和其他后遗症而发生皮瓣水肿的风险。本研究的目的是评估作者所在机构这一队列的液体给药趋势,并评估其对患者预后的影响。资料:对接受游离皮瓣乳房重建术的患者进行回顾性分析。收集患者人口统计和住院数据,并记录腹部皮瓣的类型和重建时间。跟踪围手术期给液量,主要结局包括并发症发生率和类型(如急性失血性贫血(ABLA)、部分/全部皮瓣丢失等)。采用多变量logistic回归来评估液体容量对患者预后的影响。结果:115例患者(平均年龄51.3±10.5岁)行188例腹部游离皮瓣。最常用的是腹下动脉穿支皮瓣(n = 91),其次是保留肌肉的腹直肌横断面皮瓣(n = 88)。多变量logistic回归显示围手术期高给液量(≥9000mL)与医疗并发症的几率增加相关(OR =21.7;可信区间5.54 - -84.5;结论:大容量复苏(≥9000mL)与ABLA的几率增加以及腹部游离皮瓣乳房重建患者发生医学和皮瓣并发症的可能性增加有关。该数据应用于指导实施乳房重建自由皮瓣的机构制定方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信