Routine abdominal drainage after pancreatectomy: A Byesian meta-analysis.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Shengxiang Hou, Zonghao Hou, Li Ren, Zhixin Wang, Haijiu Wang, Chengwei Tie, Manjun Deng, Haining Fan
{"title":"Routine abdominal drainage after pancreatectomy: A Byesian meta-analysis.","authors":"Shengxiang Hou, Zonghao Hou, Li Ren, Zhixin Wang, Haijiu Wang, Chengwei Tie, Manjun Deng, Haining Fan","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of prophylactic abdominal drainage on post-pancreatectomy complications, a topic that is still debated in the medical community.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic search across databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Ovid, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science, CNKI, and WanFang Data, focusing on studies comparing intraperitoneal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery. Key outcomes included postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, mortality, complications, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage,intestinal fistula, abdominal abscess,postoperative bleeding, interventional radiology drainage, reoperation, and unplanned readmissions. Statistical analyses were conducted using either a Beta Normal Hierarchical Model or a random-effects model, providing combined odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were also performed based on surgical procedures, specifically Distal Pancreatectomy (DP) and Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis, incorporating 5 RCTs and 10 non-RCTs, identified a significant link between routine abdominal drainage and higher rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and unplanned readmissions.The overall ORs were 2.46 (95% CI: 1.90-3.63), 1.92 (95% CI: 1.38-2.64), and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.04-1.65) . In the DP subgroup, the ORs were 2.48 (95% CI: 1.49-5.00), 2.75 (95% CI: 1.65-5.21), and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.06-2.18). In the PD subgroup, the ORs were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.70-3.36), 1.95 (95% CI: 1.17-3.19), and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.00-1.60). The use of drainage was associated with a decreased mortality following PD, with an OR of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.23-0.96),however, this association was not observed in relation to other surgical methods. No significant differences were found among the groups for the other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For surgeries other than PD, omitting drainage tubes may benefit patients postoperatively. However, unselected cessation of intraperitoneal drainage after PD correlates with reduced pancreatic fistulas but higher mortality. Future randomized trials should compare routine versus selective drainage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of prophylactic abdominal drainage on post-pancreatectomy complications, a topic that is still debated in the medical community.

Materials and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a systematic search across databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Ovid, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science, CNKI, and WanFang Data, focusing on studies comparing intraperitoneal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery. Key outcomes included postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, mortality, complications, delayed gastric emptying, bile leakage,intestinal fistula, abdominal abscess,postoperative bleeding, interventional radiology drainage, reoperation, and unplanned readmissions. Statistical analyses were conducted using either a Beta Normal Hierarchical Model or a random-effects model, providing combined odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were also performed based on surgical procedures, specifically Distal Pancreatectomy (DP) and Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

Results: This meta-analysis, incorporating 5 RCTs and 10 non-RCTs, identified a significant link between routine abdominal drainage and higher rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and unplanned readmissions.The overall ORs were 2.46 (95% CI: 1.90-3.63), 1.92 (95% CI: 1.38-2.64), and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.04-1.65) . In the DP subgroup, the ORs were 2.48 (95% CI: 1.49-5.00), 2.75 (95% CI: 1.65-5.21), and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.06-2.18). In the PD subgroup, the ORs were 2.34 (95% CI: 1.70-3.36), 1.95 (95% CI: 1.17-3.19), and 1.25 (95% CI: 1.00-1.60). The use of drainage was associated with a decreased mortality following PD, with an OR of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.23-0.96),however, this association was not observed in relation to other surgical methods. No significant differences were found among the groups for the other outcomes.

Conclusion: For surgeries other than PD, omitting drainage tubes may benefit patients postoperatively. However, unselected cessation of intraperitoneal drainage after PD correlates with reduced pancreatic fistulas but higher mortality. Future randomized trials should compare routine versus selective drainage.

胰切除术后常规腹腔引流:一项贝叶斯荟萃分析。
目的:本荟萃分析旨在评估预防性腹腔引流对胰腺切除术后并发症的影响,这一话题在医学界仍存在争议。材料和方法:根据PRISMA指南,作者对PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Ovid、clinicaltrials.gov、Web of Science、CNKI、万方数据等数据库进行了系统检索,重点关注胰腺手术后腹腔内引流与不引流的比较研究。主要结局包括术后胰瘘、临床相关的术后胰瘘、死亡率、并发症、胃排空延迟、胆漏、肠瘘、腹部脓肿、术后出血、介入放射学引流、再手术和非计划再入院。采用Beta正态分层模型或随机效应模型进行统计分析,提供95%置信区间(ci)的组合优势比(ORs)。亚组分析也基于外科手术,特别是远端胰腺切除术(DP)和胰十二指肠切除术(PD)进行。结果:这项荟萃分析纳入了5项随机对照试验和10项非随机对照试验,确定了常规腹部引流与术后胰瘘、临床相关的术后胰瘘和意外再入院发生率之间的显著联系。总体or分别为2.46 (95% CI: 1.90-3.63)、1.92 (95% CI: 1.38-2.64)和1.32 (95% CI: 1.04-1.65)。DP亚组的or分别为2.48 (95% CI: 1.49-5.00)、2.75 (95% CI: 1.65-5.21)和1.46 (95% CI: 1.06-2.18)。PD亚组的or分别为2.34 (95% CI: 1.70-3.36)、1.95 (95% CI: 1.17-3.19)和1.25 (95% CI: 1.00-1.60)。引流术的使用与PD后死亡率的降低相关,OR为0.49 (95% CI: 0.23-0.96),然而,与其他手术方法没有观察到这种关联。其他结果各组间无显著差异。结论:对于PD以外的手术,省略引流管对患者术后有益。然而,PD后非选择性停止腹腔内引流与胰瘘减少相关,但死亡率较高。未来的随机试验应该比较常规引流和选择性引流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信