Improving pain score and restraint duration during circumcision.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Ramzi A Kilani
{"title":"Improving pain score and restraint duration during circumcision.","authors":"Ramzi A Kilani","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_852_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends providing adequate analgesia during circumcision. Ring block is the most effective method of analgesia, while topical crème (EMLA: lidocaine and prilocaine topical) alone is ineffective. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) project. The aim was to reduce pain scores and restraint duration during circumcision by 20% from baseline over six months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed the standard QI process using PDSA cycles and standard QI charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our preintervention data over six weeks revealed significantly higher pain scores if residents performed the procedure or if EMLA was used compared to nerve block. Our intervention included but was not limited to having a new policy to stop using EMLA and have residents watch a video on ring block before performing the procedure. Data collected over subsequent 3.5 months showed that the mean restraint time was reduced by 29% by attendings and by 15% by residents, the use of EMLA cream was eliminated, mean pain score was reduced by 82% when performed by residents and by 20% by attendings, and pain score above 3 was reduced by 100% by residents and attendings. We conducted a sustainability phase over two months. We demonstrated the sustainability of reduced restraint time among attendings but to a lesser extent among residents and the sustainability of mean pain score among both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that improving effective analgesia during circumcision can be achieved and sustained using the QI project.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 4","pages":"1174-1178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_852_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends providing adequate analgesia during circumcision. Ring block is the most effective method of analgesia, while topical crème (EMLA: lidocaine and prilocaine topical) alone is ineffective. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) project. The aim was to reduce pain scores and restraint duration during circumcision by 20% from baseline over six months.

Methods: We followed the standard QI process using PDSA cycles and standard QI charts.

Results: Our preintervention data over six weeks revealed significantly higher pain scores if residents performed the procedure or if EMLA was used compared to nerve block. Our intervention included but was not limited to having a new policy to stop using EMLA and have residents watch a video on ring block before performing the procedure. Data collected over subsequent 3.5 months showed that the mean restraint time was reduced by 29% by attendings and by 15% by residents, the use of EMLA cream was eliminated, mean pain score was reduced by 82% when performed by residents and by 20% by attendings, and pain score above 3 was reduced by 100% by residents and attendings. We conducted a sustainability phase over two months. We demonstrated the sustainability of reduced restraint time among attendings but to a lesser extent among residents and the sustainability of mean pain score among both.

Conclusions: We conclude that improving effective analgesia during circumcision can be achieved and sustained using the QI project.

改善包皮环切术的疼痛评分和约束时间。
美国儿科学会(AAP)建议在包皮环切术中提供足够的镇痛。环阻滞是最有效的镇痛方法,而单独局部镇痛(EMLA:利多卡因和丙胺卡因局部)无效。我们进行了质量改进(QI)项目。目的是在六个月内将包皮环切术的疼痛评分和约束时间从基线降低20%。方法:采用PDSA循环和标准QI图进行标准QI过程。结果:我们在干预前六周的数据显示,与神经阻滞相比,如果住院医师进行手术或使用EMLA,疼痛评分显着提高。我们的干预措施包括但不限于制定停止使用EMLA的新政策,并让住院医生在进行手术前观看环形街区的视频。在随后的3.5个月里收集的数据显示,主治医生和住院医生的平均束缚时间分别减少了29%和15%,不再使用EMLA乳膏,住院医生和住院医生的平均疼痛评分分别减少了82%和20%,住院医生和住院医生的疼痛评分在3分以上时减少了100%。我们进行了为期两个月的可持续发展阶段。我们证明了减少约束时间在主治医师中的可持续性,但在住院医师中的可持续性较低,以及两者的平均疼痛评分的可持续性。结论:我们认为使用QI项目可以改善包皮环切术中有效的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信