Efficacy of Clinician Education on the Americans With Disabilities Act for People With Opioid Use Disorder-A Prospective Study.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Anna-Maria South, Anthony A Mangino, Laura C Fanucchi, Michelle R Lofwall
{"title":"Efficacy of Clinician Education on the Americans With Disabilities Act for People With Opioid Use Disorder-A Prospective Study.","authors":"Anna-Maria South, Anthony A Mangino, Laura C Fanucchi, Michelle R Lofwall","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is a standard of care for mortality-reducing treatment for people with opioid use disorder (OUD). Some health care settings have blanket policies forbidding MOUD treatment, which can increase mortality risk and violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Clinicians are not routinely educated on the ADA as it applies to OUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective survey study conducted in 2023 evaluates clinicians' knowledge, attitudes and current clinical practice before and after a 1-hour educational intervention (interactive didactic session) focused on patients with OUD who are experiencing discrimination under the ADA for being in MOUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine participants were invited to participate in the study; 84.8% completed the baseline survey and 60.8% completed both surveys. Before the intervention, participants identified understanding the protections for people with OUD under the ADA as important (38.3%) or extremely important (57.5%). Yet, the minority (17.4%) felt they were able to identify a potential ADA violation or knew how to report one (13.1%). After the intervention, the majority of participants (99.6%) were confident in identifying potential ADA violations, knew how to report them (97.9%), and reported intent to report potential violations (89.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Education on the ADA as it applies to people with OUD significantly increased participants' self-reported ability to identify and willingness to report ADA violations (P < 0.001). More research is needed to assess whether education translates into increased reporting and sustained clinical practice change.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is a standard of care for mortality-reducing treatment for people with opioid use disorder (OUD). Some health care settings have blanket policies forbidding MOUD treatment, which can increase mortality risk and violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Clinicians are not routinely educated on the ADA as it applies to OUD.

Methods: This prospective survey study conducted in 2023 evaluates clinicians' knowledge, attitudes and current clinical practice before and after a 1-hour educational intervention (interactive didactic session) focused on patients with OUD who are experiencing discrimination under the ADA for being in MOUD treatment.

Results: Seventy-nine participants were invited to participate in the study; 84.8% completed the baseline survey and 60.8% completed both surveys. Before the intervention, participants identified understanding the protections for people with OUD under the ADA as important (38.3%) or extremely important (57.5%). Yet, the minority (17.4%) felt they were able to identify a potential ADA violation or knew how to report one (13.1%). After the intervention, the majority of participants (99.6%) were confident in identifying potential ADA violations, knew how to report them (97.9%), and reported intent to report potential violations (89.3%).

Conclusions: Education on the ADA as it applies to people with OUD significantly increased participants' self-reported ability to identify and willingness to report ADA violations (P < 0.001). More research is needed to assess whether education translates into increased reporting and sustained clinical practice change.

临床医生教育对美国残疾人法案对阿片类药物使用障碍患者的疗效-一项前瞻性研究
目的:阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)药物治疗是阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者mortality-reducing治疗的标准护理。一些卫生保健机构制定了全面禁止mod治疗的政策,这可能增加死亡风险,并违反了《美国残疾人法》(ADA)。临床医生并没有接受常规的ADA教育,因为它适用于OUD。方法:这项于2023年进行的前瞻性调查研究,评估了临床医生的知识、态度和目前的临床实践,这些临床医生在1小时的教育干预(互动教学会议)前后,重点关注在ADA下因接受mod治疗而受到歧视的OUD患者。结果:79名受试者被邀请参与研究;84.8%完成了基线调查,60.8%完成了两项调查。在干预之前,参与者认为理解《美国残疾人法》对OUD患者的保护是重要的(38.3%)或极其重要的(57.5%)。然而,少数人(17.4%)认为他们能够识别潜在的《美国残疾人法》违规行为,或者知道如何举报(13.1%)。干预后,大多数参与者(99.6%)有信心识别潜在的《美国残疾人法》违规行为,知道如何报告(97.9%),并报告了报告潜在违规行为的意图(89.3%)。结论:对OUD患者进行ADA教育显著提高了参与者自我报告的识别和举报违反ADA行为的能力和意愿(P < 0.001)。需要更多的研究来评估教育是否转化为增加的报告和持续的临床实践变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信