Elaine Lin, Tara Pillai, Victoria N Yi, Ann Marie Flusche, Sakshi Chopra, Melissa Tran, Ash Patel, Kristen Rezak
{"title":"Career Paths After Microsurgery Fellowship: A 10-Year Analysis.","authors":"Elaine Lin, Tara Pillai, Victoria N Yi, Ann Marie Flusche, Sakshi Chopra, Melissa Tran, Ash Patel, Kristen Rezak","doi":"10.1055/a-2616-4716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Over the past 10 years, microsurgery fellowship programs and positions have increased by 50%, underscoring the need to understand graduate career paths and provide trainees context about future practice. This study analyzed who pursues microsurgery fellowships and factors associated with academic careers. Methods This cross-sectional analysis examined graduates from the past 10 years from fellowships recognized by the American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery or graduates of international fellowships who completed residency in the United States. Demographic variables included gender, race, residency location, and Integrated vs. Independent plastic surgery residency. Bibliometric indices at the time of graduation and October 2024 were measured. Initial and current practice setting were categorized as academic (full-time faculty), \"private affiliated\" (involved in teaching but not full-time faculty), or private practice. Results Overall, 423 graduates were identified. The majority were male (62.9%) and White (63.4%). Most completed Integrated residency (72.6%). Five fellowships accounted for 48.0% of graduates: MD Anderson (80), Memorial Sloan Kettering (46), University of Pennsylvania (38), Stanford University (23), and The Buncke Clinic (16). After fellowship, 68.0% of graduates entered academia, and 63.2% of graduates are in academia currently out of 419 analyzed. Fellowship location was associated with initial academic practice (p=0.01), many graduates from International (80.0%), and Southern (78.4%) fellowships entering academia. Graduates in initial academic practice had higher median initial g-index (13 vs. 10, p=0.03) and median initial publications (15 vs. 11, p=0.02). Multiple logistic regression found initial publications and fellowship location to be best predictors of initial academic practice. Conclusion While most graduates pursue academia, a significant number enter private practice, indicating it is a viable option. Southern or International fellowships send more graduates into academia, but this is likely influenced by popular fellowships. Nuanced factors like personal preference, financial considerations, and networking likely play a significant role in career choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2616-4716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Over the past 10 years, microsurgery fellowship programs and positions have increased by 50%, underscoring the need to understand graduate career paths and provide trainees context about future practice. This study analyzed who pursues microsurgery fellowships and factors associated with academic careers. Methods This cross-sectional analysis examined graduates from the past 10 years from fellowships recognized by the American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery or graduates of international fellowships who completed residency in the United States. Demographic variables included gender, race, residency location, and Integrated vs. Independent plastic surgery residency. Bibliometric indices at the time of graduation and October 2024 were measured. Initial and current practice setting were categorized as academic (full-time faculty), "private affiliated" (involved in teaching but not full-time faculty), or private practice. Results Overall, 423 graduates were identified. The majority were male (62.9%) and White (63.4%). Most completed Integrated residency (72.6%). Five fellowships accounted for 48.0% of graduates: MD Anderson (80), Memorial Sloan Kettering (46), University of Pennsylvania (38), Stanford University (23), and The Buncke Clinic (16). After fellowship, 68.0% of graduates entered academia, and 63.2% of graduates are in academia currently out of 419 analyzed. Fellowship location was associated with initial academic practice (p=0.01), many graduates from International (80.0%), and Southern (78.4%) fellowships entering academia. Graduates in initial academic practice had higher median initial g-index (13 vs. 10, p=0.03) and median initial publications (15 vs. 11, p=0.02). Multiple logistic regression found initial publications and fellowship location to be best predictors of initial academic practice. Conclusion While most graduates pursue academia, a significant number enter private practice, indicating it is a viable option. Southern or International fellowships send more graduates into academia, but this is likely influenced by popular fellowships. Nuanced factors like personal preference, financial considerations, and networking likely play a significant role in career choices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.