Comparison of Clinical Outcomes on Short Tape Single-Incision Sling Devices (Solyx) and Adjustable Length Device (I-Stop-Mini) for Urodynamic Stress Incontinence at 1 Year.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tsia-Shu Lo, Louiza Erika Rellora, Eyal Rom, Chia-Hsuan Yang, Huan-Ka Chiung
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes on Short Tape Single-Incision Sling Devices (Solyx) and Adjustable Length Device (I-Stop-Mini) for Urodynamic Stress Incontinence at 1 Year.","authors":"Tsia-Shu Lo, Louiza Erika Rellora, Eyal Rom, Chia-Hsuan Yang, Huan-Ka Chiung","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06155-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The study is primarily aimed at comparing the outcome of voiding dysfunction related to over-tension and the resumption of normal voiding after tension-releasing suture (TRS) manipulation following Solyx and I-stop-mini procedures. Second, it is aimed at determining the cure rate, complications, and quality of life at 1 year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study conducted from March 2015 to June 2023. Patients with clinically confirmed pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urodynamic stress incontinence were included; those with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) greater than stage II, neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, or post-void residual of more than 100 ml were excluded. Standardized preoperative evaluations and TRS were used. Follow-ups were conducted at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and annually. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 453 patients, 333 underwent Solyx and 120 underwent I-stop-mini procedures. The mean age was 56.6 years with an average BMI of 25.4. After Solyx, 18.9% had urinary retention whereas 10.8% had urinary retention after I-stop-mini. TRS manipulation was done in 12% post-Solyx and 4.2% post-I-stop-mini. Objective cure rates were 87.1% for Solyx and 91.7% for the I-stop-mini, with no statistical difference. Two patients in the Solyx group required repeat mid-urethral sling surgery. No cases of mesh erosion were noted in either of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Solyx and I-stop-mini are both effective at treating SUI. A short-tape single-incision sling device (Solyx) resulted in more voiding dysfunction than the adjustable-length device (I-stop-mini). TRS helps to resolve postoperative voiding dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06155-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The study is primarily aimed at comparing the outcome of voiding dysfunction related to over-tension and the resumption of normal voiding after tension-releasing suture (TRS) manipulation following Solyx and I-stop-mini procedures. Second, it is aimed at determining the cure rate, complications, and quality of life at 1 year postoperatively.

Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted from March 2015 to June 2023. Patients with clinically confirmed pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urodynamic stress incontinence were included; those with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) greater than stage II, neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, or post-void residual of more than 100 ml were excluded. Standardized preoperative evaluations and TRS were used. Follow-ups were conducted at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and annually. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.

Results: Out of 453 patients, 333 underwent Solyx and 120 underwent I-stop-mini procedures. The mean age was 56.6 years with an average BMI of 25.4. After Solyx, 18.9% had urinary retention whereas 10.8% had urinary retention after I-stop-mini. TRS manipulation was done in 12% post-Solyx and 4.2% post-I-stop-mini. Objective cure rates were 87.1% for Solyx and 91.7% for the I-stop-mini, with no statistical difference. Two patients in the Solyx group required repeat mid-urethral sling surgery. No cases of mesh erosion were noted in either of the groups.

Conclusions: Solyx and I-stop-mini are both effective at treating SUI. A short-tape single-incision sling device (Solyx) resulted in more voiding dysfunction than the adjustable-length device (I-stop-mini). TRS helps to resolve postoperative voiding dysfunction.

短带单切口吊带装置(Solyx)与可调长度装置(I-Stop-Mini)治疗1年尿动力应激性尿失禁的临床效果比较
简介和假设:本研究主要目的是比较Solyx和i - stopmini手术后减压缝合(TRS)操作后与过度张力相关的排尿功能障碍和恢复正常排尿的结果。其次,目的是确定术后1年的治愈率、并发症和生活质量。方法:回顾性研究于2015年3月至2023年6月进行。纳入临床确诊为单纯压力性尿失禁(SUI)和尿动力压力性尿失禁的患者;盆腔器官脱垂(POP)大于II期、神经源性下尿路功能障碍或空后残留超过100 ml者排除。采用标准化术前评估和TRS。随访时间分别为1周、1个月、3个月、6个月和每年。采用SPSS 17进行统计分析。结果:在453例患者中,333例接受了Solyx手术,120例接受了I-stop-mini手术。平均年龄为56.6岁,平均BMI为25.4。使用Solyx后,18.9%的患者出现尿潴留,而使用I-stop-mini后,10.8%的患者出现尿潴留。在solyx术后进行TRS操作的比例为12%,在i -stop mini术后进行TRS操作的比例为4.2%。Solyx的客观治愈率为87.1%,I-stop-mini的客观治愈率为91.7%,两者无统计学差异。Solyx组2例患者需要重复尿道中吊带手术。两组均未见网状糜烂。结论:Solyx和I-stop-mini治疗SUI均有效。短带单切口吊索装置(Solyx)比可调长度装置(i - stopmini)造成更多的排尿功能障碍。TRS有助于解决术后排尿功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信