Triggers for identifying anticoagulation-associated adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Uyen Thi Nguyen, Khanh N C Duong, Phuong Thi Lan Nguyen, Ha Ngan Tran, Hoa Mai Nguyen, Huyen Thi Thu Cao, Hoa Dinh Vu, Hoang Anh Nguyen
{"title":"Triggers for identifying anticoagulation-associated adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Uyen Thi Nguyen, Khanh N C Duong, Phuong Thi Lan Nguyen, Ha Ngan Tran, Hoa Mai Nguyen, Huyen Thi Thu Cao, Hoa Dinh Vu, Hoang Anh Nguyen","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01916-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anticoagulation therapy presents a high risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) in hospitalized patients, highlighting the need for effective detection strategies in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The review aimed to identify triggers for detecting anticoagulation-associated ADEs in hospitalized patients and describe the performance of these triggers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were queried until April 19, 2024. We included studies on trigger tools for detecting anticoagulation-related ADEs in hospitalized patients. The study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Trigger framework based on the QUADAS-2 tool for diagnostic accuracy. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to pool positive predictive values (PPV), with heterogeneity assessed via I<sup>2</sup> statistic and Cochran's Q test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were included. Seventeen triggers were reported and categorized into three modules: abnormal laboratory values (11 triggers), medications or antidotes (three triggers), and care (three triggers). Elevated international normalized ratio (INR) was the most prevalent trigger (16 studies) with a PPV of 0.539 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.310-0.768). Other triggers exhibited lower pooled PPVs than elevated INR, including vitamin K administration (15 studies, PPV 0.222, 95% CI 0.153-0.290), abrupt medication cessation (14 studies, PPV 0.418, 95% CI 0.169-0.667), and activated partial thromboplastin time > 100 s (11 studies, PPV 0.336, 95% CI 0.173-0.498). Importantly, in-hospital stroke (three studies) had the highest pooled PPV of 0.964 (95% CI 0.803-1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review demonstrated the variability in PPVs of triggers for anticoagulation-associated ADEs, emphasizing the necessity for a specialized trigger tool for hospitalized patients on anticoagulants.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1132-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01916-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anticoagulation therapy presents a high risk of adverse drug events (ADEs) in hospitalized patients, highlighting the need for effective detection strategies in clinical practice.

Aim: The review aimed to identify triggers for detecting anticoagulation-associated ADEs in hospitalized patients and describe the performance of these triggers.

Method: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were queried until April 19, 2024. We included studies on trigger tools for detecting anticoagulation-related ADEs in hospitalized patients. The study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Trigger framework based on the QUADAS-2 tool for diagnostic accuracy. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to pool positive predictive values (PPV), with heterogeneity assessed via I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test.

Results: Twenty-three studies were included. Seventeen triggers were reported and categorized into three modules: abnormal laboratory values (11 triggers), medications or antidotes (three triggers), and care (three triggers). Elevated international normalized ratio (INR) was the most prevalent trigger (16 studies) with a PPV of 0.539 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.310-0.768). Other triggers exhibited lower pooled PPVs than elevated INR, including vitamin K administration (15 studies, PPV 0.222, 95% CI 0.153-0.290), abrupt medication cessation (14 studies, PPV 0.418, 95% CI 0.169-0.667), and activated partial thromboplastin time > 100 s (11 studies, PPV 0.336, 95% CI 0.173-0.498). Importantly, in-hospital stroke (three studies) had the highest pooled PPV of 0.964 (95% CI 0.803-1.000).

Conclusion: This review demonstrated the variability in PPVs of triggers for anticoagulation-associated ADEs, emphasizing the necessity for a specialized trigger tool for hospitalized patients on anticoagulants.

识别住院患者抗凝相关药物不良事件的触发因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:抗凝治疗在住院患者中存在较高的药物不良事件(ADEs)风险,在临床实践中需要有效的检测策略。目的:本综述旨在确定检测住院患者抗凝相关ade的触发因素,并描述这些触发因素的表现。方法:查询PubMed、Cochrane、Embase,查询截止日期为2024年4月19日。我们纳入了用于检测住院患者抗凝相关ade的触发工具的研究。使用基于QUADAS-2诊断准确性工具的质量评估触发框架评估研究质量。我们进行随机效应荟萃分析,汇集阳性预测值(PPV),并通过I2统计量和Cochran’s Q检验评估异质性。结果:纳入23项研究。报告了17个触发因素,并将其分为三个模块:异常实验室值(11个触发因素)、药物或解毒剂(3个触发因素)和护理(3个触发因素)。国际标准化比值(INR)升高是最常见的触发因素(16项研究),PPV为0.539(95%可信区间[CI] 0.0.310 -0.768)。与INR升高相比,其他触发因素表现出较低的合并PPV,包括维生素K给药(15项研究,PPV 0.222, 95% CI 0.153-0.290)、突然停止用药(14项研究,PPV 0.418, 95% CI 0.169-0.667)和激活部分凝血活素时间bbb100 s(11项研究,PPV 0.336, 95% CI 0.173-0.498)。重要的是,住院卒中(三项研究)的合并PPV最高,为0.964 (95% CI 0.803-1.000)。结论:本综述证明了抗凝相关ade的触发因素ppv的可变性,强调了为抗凝治疗住院患者提供专门的触发工具的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信