A retrospective, non-inferiority study of a Treat-at-Home strategy utilizing a surfactant-based dressing for partial-thickness burn wounds.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Lorraine A Todor, Matthew Sanders, Elysha Lyle, Denise Knight, Maria Tucci, Jacob Jarreau, Mahmoud Hassouba, David M Hill
{"title":"A retrospective, non-inferiority study of a Treat-at-Home strategy utilizing a surfactant-based dressing for partial-thickness burn wounds.","authors":"Lorraine A Todor, Matthew Sanders, Elysha Lyle, Denise Knight, Maria Tucci, Jacob Jarreau, Mahmoud Hassouba, David M Hill","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Partial thickness (PT) burns are the most common depth of burn seen in emergency departments. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients managed with a treatment-at-home (TAH) strategy using water-soluble surfactant dressing (WSD) compared to any other dressing (non-WSD). This single-center, retrospective study included all patients with thermal burns treated in the burn center-specific emergency department between May 2019 and May 2023. Patients were excluded if admission was deemed necessary during the initial emergency department assessment. Additionally, patients were excluded for having first degree burns, full-thickness burns, electrical burns, being less than 18 years old, pregnant or incarcerated, or not expected to survive. The planned enrollment was designed to fulfill non-inferiority and potential superiority of surfactant-based dressing versus any another TAH strategy. Two-thousand seven-hundred forty-seven patients were screened over the four-year study. After applying exclusion criteria, 1,001 patients remained in the study group. There were no differences in demographics and injury mechanism, except the non-WSD group contained more patients that were cocaine positive (p = 0.009)and had burns to the head/neck (p < 0.0001). Few in the WSD or non-WSD group required subsequent admission for burn wound excision [5 (1.0%) vs. 2 (0.4%)] although the non-WSD had significantly fewer return for follow up [336 (68.71%) vs 273 (53.32%), p < 0.001]. This is the largest study to evaluate the use of WSD for immediate treatment of PT burns to avoid admission. WSD was found to be non-inferior to other non-WSD TAH strategies. But no matter the choice of home wound treatment, few required subsequent admission for surgery. Given the success of both groups, a TAH model, when feasible, could allow patients to recover at home and result in cost and resource savings associated with admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Partial thickness (PT) burns are the most common depth of burn seen in emergency departments. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients managed with a treatment-at-home (TAH) strategy using water-soluble surfactant dressing (WSD) compared to any other dressing (non-WSD). This single-center, retrospective study included all patients with thermal burns treated in the burn center-specific emergency department between May 2019 and May 2023. Patients were excluded if admission was deemed necessary during the initial emergency department assessment. Additionally, patients were excluded for having first degree burns, full-thickness burns, electrical burns, being less than 18 years old, pregnant or incarcerated, or not expected to survive. The planned enrollment was designed to fulfill non-inferiority and potential superiority of surfactant-based dressing versus any another TAH strategy. Two-thousand seven-hundred forty-seven patients were screened over the four-year study. After applying exclusion criteria, 1,001 patients remained in the study group. There were no differences in demographics and injury mechanism, except the non-WSD group contained more patients that were cocaine positive (p = 0.009)and had burns to the head/neck (p < 0.0001). Few in the WSD or non-WSD group required subsequent admission for burn wound excision [5 (1.0%) vs. 2 (0.4%)] although the non-WSD had significantly fewer return for follow up [336 (68.71%) vs 273 (53.32%), p < 0.001]. This is the largest study to evaluate the use of WSD for immediate treatment of PT burns to avoid admission. WSD was found to be non-inferior to other non-WSD TAH strategies. But no matter the choice of home wound treatment, few required subsequent admission for surgery. Given the success of both groups, a TAH model, when feasible, could allow patients to recover at home and result in cost and resource savings associated with admission.

一项使用表面活性剂为基础的敷料治疗部分厚度烧伤创面的居家治疗策略的回顾性非劣效性研究。
部分厚度烧伤是急诊科最常见的深度烧伤。本研究旨在评估使用水溶性表面活性剂敷料(WSD)进行居家治疗(TAH)策略的患者与其他任何敷料(非WSD)的结果。这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2019年5月至2023年5月期间在烧伤中心特定急诊科治疗的所有热烧伤患者。在最初的急诊科评估中认为有必要入院的患者被排除在外。此外,患者被排除为一级烧伤,全层烧伤,电烧伤,未满18岁,怀孕或监禁,或预计无法生存。计划入组的目的是实现基于表面活性剂的敷料相对于任何其他TAH策略的非劣效性和潜在优势。在为期四年的研究中,共有2747名患者接受了筛查。应用排除标准后,1001例患者留在研究组。除非wsd组可卡因阳性(p = 0.009)和头颈部烧伤(p < 0.0001)患者较多外,两组在人口统计学和损伤机制上均无差异。WSD组和非WSD组中很少有患者需要后续入院进行烧伤切口切除术[5人(1.0%)对2人(0.4%)],尽管非WSD组的随访率明显低于336人(68.71%)对273人(53.32%),p < 0.001]。这是评估使用WSD立即治疗PT烧伤以避免入院的最大研究。水务署的发展策略并不逊于其他非水务署的发展策略。但无论选择家庭伤口处理,很少需要后续入院手术。考虑到两组的成功,如果可行,TAH模式可以让患者在家中康复,并节省与入院相关的成本和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信