A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Cryotherapy Combined with Intralesional Steroids, Intralesional Bleomycin Combined with Steroids and Fractional CO2 Laser in Keloids.

IF 1.9 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Indian Dermatology Online Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.4103/idoj.idoj_789_24
P Sravya Krishna, K V T Gopal, K Ananditha, V Sai Teja Reddy, T Narayana Rao
{"title":"A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Cryotherapy Combined with Intralesional Steroids, Intralesional Bleomycin Combined with Steroids and Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser in Keloids.","authors":"P Sravya Krishna, K V T Gopal, K Ananditha, V Sai Teja Reddy, T Narayana Rao","doi":"10.4103/idoj.idoj_789_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the availability of various treatment modalities, the treatment of keloids is often incomplete, with a high recurrence rate. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of cryotherapy combined with intralesional steroid injections (Cy + ILS), intralesional combined bleomycin and steroids (ILB + S), and fractional carbon dioxide laser (Fr CO<sub>2</sub>) in keloid management.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Ninety cases with keloids were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups of 30 patients each. The baseline severity of keloids was graded using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS). Group A, B, and C patients were treated with Cy + ILS, ILB + S, and Fr CO<sub>2</sub>, respectively for four sittings at 4-week intervals. Improvement in VSS score was calculated after 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks, and with HFUS after 16 weeks. At each visit, adverse effects, if any, were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of 16 weeks, the reductions in VSS in Cy + ILS, ILB + S, and Fr CO<sub>2</sub> groups were 5.12 (60.09%), 5.84 (69.30%), and 3.06 (38.3%), respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.00). The difference in mean VSS reduction after 16 weeks between ILB + S and Cy + ILS was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.28), whereas ILB + S and Cy + ILS were more efficacious than Fr CO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.01 and <i>P</i> = 0.02, respectively). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable between ILB + S and Fr CO<sub>2</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.11) but higher with Cy + ILS (<i>P</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Small sample size, non-blinded design, and short follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ILB + S may be considered as the first-line treatment option for keloids in view of its satisfactory efficacy, and excellent safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":13335,"journal":{"name":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","volume":"16 3","pages":"407-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_789_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of various treatment modalities, the treatment of keloids is often incomplete, with a high recurrence rate. The present study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of cryotherapy combined with intralesional steroid injections (Cy + ILS), intralesional combined bleomycin and steroids (ILB + S), and fractional carbon dioxide laser (Fr CO2) in keloid management.

Patients and methods: Ninety cases with keloids were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups of 30 patients each. The baseline severity of keloids was graded using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS). Group A, B, and C patients were treated with Cy + ILS, ILB + S, and Fr CO2, respectively for four sittings at 4-week intervals. Improvement in VSS score was calculated after 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks, and with HFUS after 16 weeks. At each visit, adverse effects, if any, were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and ANOVA.

Results: At the end of 16 weeks, the reductions in VSS in Cy + ILS, ILB + S, and Fr CO2 groups were 5.12 (60.09%), 5.84 (69.30%), and 3.06 (38.3%), respectively (P = 0.00). The difference in mean VSS reduction after 16 weeks between ILB + S and Cy + ILS was not significant (P = 0.28), whereas ILB + S and Cy + ILS were more efficacious than Fr CO2 (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable between ILB + S and Fr CO2 (P = 0.11) but higher with Cy + ILS (P = 0.04).

Limitations: Small sample size, non-blinded design, and short follow-up period.

Conclusion: ILB + S may be considered as the first-line treatment option for keloids in view of its satisfactory efficacy, and excellent safety profile.

一项评估冷冻联合病灶内类固醇、病灶内博来霉素联合类固醇和分数CO2激光治疗瘢痕疙瘩疗效和不良反应的随机研究。
背景:尽管有多种治疗方式,瘢痕疙瘩的治疗往往是不完整的,复发率高。本研究旨在评估冷冻治疗联合病灶内类固醇注射(Cy + ILS)、病灶内博来霉素和类固醇联合(ILB + S)和分数二氧化碳激光(Fr CO2)治疗瘢痕疙瘩的疗效和安全性。患者与方法:90例瘢痕疙瘩患者随机分为3组,每组30例。使用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)和高频超声(HFUS)对瘢痕疙瘩的基线严重程度进行分级。A组、B组和C组患者分别接受Cy + ILS、ILB + S和Fr CO2治疗,每4周进行4次治疗。在4、8、12、16周后计算VSS评分改善情况,在16周后计算HFUS评分改善情况。在每次访问中,如果有任何不良反应,都会被记录下来。统计学分析采用卡方检验和方差分析。结果:16周结束时,Cy + ILS组、ILB + S组、Fr CO2组VSS分别降低5.12(60.09%)、5.84(69.30%)、3.06(38.3%),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.00)。16周后,ILB + S和Cy + ILS的平均VSS降低差异无统计学意义(P = 0.28),而ILB + S和Cy + ILS比Fr CO2更有效(P = 0.01和P = 0.02)。ILB + S和Fr CO2的不良反应发生率相当(P = 0.11),但Cy + ILS的不良反应发生率更高(P = 0.04)。局限性:样本量小,非盲法设计,随访时间短。结论:ILB + S具有良好的疗效和良好的安全性,可作为瘢痕疙瘩的一线治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
201
审稿时长
49 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信