Long-Term Adherence to a Subcutaneous Two-Channel EEG System in Patients With Focal Epilepsy.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nicolas Zabler, Yulia Novitskaya, René Sprünken, Martin Hirsch, Matthias Dümpelmann, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
{"title":"Long-Term Adherence to a Subcutaneous Two-Channel EEG System in Patients With Focal Epilepsy.","authors":"Nicolas Zabler, Yulia Novitskaya, René Sprünken, Martin Hirsch, Matthias Dümpelmann, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Outpatient seizure monitoring is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in epilepsy; however, traditional approaches such as seizure diaries and wearables have limitations in accuracy and practicality. This study evaluated the adherence and utility of an implanted subcutaneous EEG monitoring system in patients with focal temporal lobe epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At a tertiary epilepsy center, patients with focal epilepsy received a subcutaneous two-channel EEG system for ultra-long-term monitoring. The system includes a subcutaneously implanted electrode for data recording and a behind-the-ear companion device for the power supply and data transmission. Patient adherence to the device was evaluated using generalized estimating equations, considering sex, daytime/nighttime periods, age, and temporal course of measurements. The correlations between adherence and electrographic or diary-recorded seizures were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen adult patients (mean age: 45.6 years, 6 females) were monitored for an average of 200.6 days, with 416 electrographic seizures confirmed in 13 patients. The median adherence was 89.3% (interquartile range, [75.6%, 93.4%]), with females showing significantly higher adherence than males (β, -1.1600; P = 0.049). Seizure diary reporting sensitivity and precision were 20.8% and 56.4%, respectively, compared with confirmed electrographic seizures. Adherence correlated positively with confirmed electrographic seizures (r, 0.40; P, 0.004), but not with diary reports (r, -0.22; P, 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients using the subcutaneous EEG system demonstrated high adherence and reliable seizure monitoring, suggesting that it could serve as a valuable tool for managing focal epilepsy in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Outpatient seizure monitoring is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies in epilepsy; however, traditional approaches such as seizure diaries and wearables have limitations in accuracy and practicality. This study evaluated the adherence and utility of an implanted subcutaneous EEG monitoring system in patients with focal temporal lobe epilepsy.

Methods: At a tertiary epilepsy center, patients with focal epilepsy received a subcutaneous two-channel EEG system for ultra-long-term monitoring. The system includes a subcutaneously implanted electrode for data recording and a behind-the-ear companion device for the power supply and data transmission. Patient adherence to the device was evaluated using generalized estimating equations, considering sex, daytime/nighttime periods, age, and temporal course of measurements. The correlations between adherence and electrographic or diary-recorded seizures were also assessed.

Results: Fifteen adult patients (mean age: 45.6 years, 6 females) were monitored for an average of 200.6 days, with 416 electrographic seizures confirmed in 13 patients. The median adherence was 89.3% (interquartile range, [75.6%, 93.4%]), with females showing significantly higher adherence than males (β, -1.1600; P = 0.049). Seizure diary reporting sensitivity and precision were 20.8% and 56.4%, respectively, compared with confirmed electrographic seizures. Adherence correlated positively with confirmed electrographic seizures (r, 0.40; P, 0.004), but not with diary reports (r, -0.22; P, 0.13).

Conclusions: Patients using the subcutaneous EEG system demonstrated high adherence and reliable seizure monitoring, suggesting that it could serve as a valuable tool for managing focal epilepsy in clinical practice.

局灶性癫痫患者长期坚持皮下双通道脑电图系统。
目的:门诊癫痫监测对优化癫痫治疗策略至关重要;然而,诸如癫痫日记和可穿戴设备等传统方法在准确性和实用性方面存在局限性。本研究评估了植入式皮下脑电图监测系统在局灶性颞叶癫痫患者中的依从性和实用性。方法:在某三级癫痫中心,对局灶性癫痫患者采用皮下双通道脑电图系统进行超长期监测。该系统包括用于数据记录的皮下植入电极和用于供电和数据传输的耳后配套装置。使用广义估计方程评估患者对设备的依从性,考虑性别、白天/夜间时间段、年龄和测量的时间过程。依从性与电图或日记记录的癫痫发作之间的相关性也被评估。结果:15例成人患者(平均年龄:45.6岁,6例女性)平均监测200.6天,其中13例发生416次电痉挛。中位依从性为89.3%(四分位数间距,[75.6%,93.4%]),女性的依从性明显高于男性(β, -1.1600;P = 0.049)。发作日记报告的敏感性和准确性分别为20.8%和56.4%。依从性与确诊的电痉挛呈正相关(r, 0.40;P, 0.004),但与日记报告无关(r, -0.22;P 0.13)。结论:使用皮下脑电图系统的患者表现出高依从性和可靠的癫痫发作监测,表明它可以作为临床治疗局灶性癫痫的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信