Using flavour in your favour: does giving children an element of control help them engage more positively with the dental experience?

Q3 Dentistry
Beth Cunningham, John Linden
{"title":"Using flavour in your favour: does giving children an element of control help them engage more positively with the dental experience?","authors":"Beth Cunningham, John Linden","doi":"10.1038/s41432-025-01162-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>A commentary on: </strong>Karim R, Splieth C H, Schmoeckel J. Effect of choice of flavour of fluoride varnish on behaviour in dental visits in schoolchildren. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025; https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70069 .</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the efficacy of giving children choice within the dental surgery to improve behaviour outcomes, investigated by letting them choose the flavour of fluoride varnish (FV). This single-blinded, randomised control trial recruited children attending the specialised paediatric dental service within the Greifswald University Hospital for a dental check-up and preventative FV application. Upon attendance, children were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the control group, where the flavour of FV was predetermined, or the test group, where the children selected their preferred flavour. A blinded observer used Frankl behaviour rating scale (FBRS) to assess behaviour during the appointment, and taste acceptance was assessed using the Facial image scale (FIS).</p><p><strong>Case selection: </strong>70 participants were recruited at the time of their appointment. These were healthy (ASA I or ASA II) German children aged 5 to 10. Exclusion criteria included their first dental experience, experiencing dental pain or an allergy to FV. 35 children were randomly allocated to both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most children, regardless of their allocation, were assessed as positive, or definitely positive according to FBRS (n = 58, 82.8%), though results on behaviour outcomes were statistically insignificant (p = 0.376). There were no significant differences between the control group or the test group on flavour ratings of the FV, with most children (n = 53, 75.7%) scoring happy, or very happy according to FIS. History of negative dental behaviour was also taken into consideration (n = 27), and whilst it appeared children with history of negative experience displayed more positive behaviour in the test group vs the control group (75% vs 54.5%), results were not statistically significant (p = 0.244).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that allowing children a sense of control by permitting them to choose their flavour of FV may be a useful behaviour management tool, though the results are not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01162-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A commentary on: Karim R, Splieth C H, Schmoeckel J. Effect of choice of flavour of fluoride varnish on behaviour in dental visits in schoolchildren. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025; https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70069 .

Aim: To assess the efficacy of giving children choice within the dental surgery to improve behaviour outcomes, investigated by letting them choose the flavour of fluoride varnish (FV). This single-blinded, randomised control trial recruited children attending the specialised paediatric dental service within the Greifswald University Hospital for a dental check-up and preventative FV application. Upon attendance, children were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the control group, where the flavour of FV was predetermined, or the test group, where the children selected their preferred flavour. A blinded observer used Frankl behaviour rating scale (FBRS) to assess behaviour during the appointment, and taste acceptance was assessed using the Facial image scale (FIS).

Case selection: 70 participants were recruited at the time of their appointment. These were healthy (ASA I or ASA II) German children aged 5 to 10. Exclusion criteria included their first dental experience, experiencing dental pain or an allergy to FV. 35 children were randomly allocated to both groups.

Results: Most children, regardless of their allocation, were assessed as positive, or definitely positive according to FBRS (n = 58, 82.8%), though results on behaviour outcomes were statistically insignificant (p = 0.376). There were no significant differences between the control group or the test group on flavour ratings of the FV, with most children (n = 53, 75.7%) scoring happy, or very happy according to FIS. History of negative dental behaviour was also taken into consideration (n = 27), and whilst it appeared children with history of negative experience displayed more positive behaviour in the test group vs the control group (75% vs 54.5%), results were not statistically significant (p = 0.244).

Conclusion: This study shows that allowing children a sense of control by permitting them to choose their flavour of FV may be a useful behaviour management tool, though the results are not statistically significant.

使用口味对你有利:给孩子一个控制的元素能帮助他们更积极地参与牙科体验吗?
评论:Karim R, Splieth C H, Schmoeckel J.氟化物清漆口味选择对学童牙科就诊行为的影响。临床经验Dent Res. 2025;https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70069 .目的:通过让儿童选择氟化物清漆(FV)的口味,评估让儿童在牙科手术中选择以改善行为结果的效果。这项单盲、随机对照试验招募了在Greifswald大学医院的专门儿科牙科诊所接受牙科检查和预防性FV应用的儿童。出席后,孩子们被随机分配到两组中的一组:控制组,在那里FV的味道是预先确定的,或者测试组,孩子们选择他们喜欢的味道。盲法观察者使用Frankl行为评定量表(FBRS)评估约会期间的行为,并使用面部图像量表(FIS)评估味觉接受度。病例选择:70名参与者在他们的任命时被招募。这些是健康的(ASA I或ASA II) 5至10岁的德国儿童。排除标准包括首次看牙、牙痛或对FV过敏。35名儿童被随机分为两组。结果:大多数儿童,无论其分配如何,根据FBRS评估为阳性或绝对阳性(n = 58, 82.8%),但行为结局的结果无统计学意义(p = 0.376)。对照组和试验组在FV的味道评分上没有显著差异,大多数儿童(n = 53, 75.7%)根据FIS评分为快乐或非常快乐。研究还考虑了不良牙齿行为史(n = 27),虽然实验组中有不良牙齿行为史的儿童比对照组表现出更多的积极行为(75%比54.5%),但结果没有统计学意义(p = 0.244)。结论:这项研究表明,通过允许孩子们选择自己喜欢的FV口味,让他们有一种控制感,可能是一种有用的行为管理工具,尽管结果在统计上并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信