The impact of type of delivery method on medicine waste in households: a questionnaire-based study on outpatients receiving cost-free medicine in the North Denmark Region.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Anne Estrup Olesen, Helena Birk Wisby, Maja Beck Mejlholm, Mille Vraa Gamborg Eisenhardt, Iben Bang Andersen, Lisa Greve Routhe
{"title":"The impact of type of delivery method on medicine waste in households: a questionnaire-based study on outpatients receiving cost-free medicine in the North Denmark Region.","authors":"Anne Estrup Olesen, Helena Birk Wisby, Maja Beck Mejlholm, Mille Vraa Gamborg Eisenhardt, Iben Bang Andersen, Lisa Greve Routhe","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The increasing number of patients challenges healthcare and drives demand for home-based treatments. In the North Denmark Region, outpatients can acquire their hospital medication as 'cost-free medicine' through home delivery or medication pickup lockers. With a focus on home-based treatments and limited household medicine tracking, investigating medicine waste is crucial for resource optimisation. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of excess medication among outpatients in the North Denmark Region, whether there was an association between excess cost-free medicine and type of delivery method, and reasons for the excess.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included outpatients from the Department of Neurology or Department of Gastroenterology at Aalborg University Hospital receiving cost-free medication from March to October 2023. Eligible outpatients received a questionnaire via Digital Post. As medicine waste is difficult to measure directly, excess medication was used as a surrogate measure. Patient data were acquired through Apovision and stored in REDCap. Pearson's χ<sup>2</sup> test was performed to examine the difference in excess medicine between medication pickup locker and home delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>52.8% (233/441) of outpatients reported excess cost-free medication at home. Medication pickup lockers, where 58.9% (132/224) reported an excess, were associated with larger medicine stocks at home compared with home delivery where 46.5% (101/217) reported excess (p=0.009). For 45.5% (106/233) of medicine pickup locker users and 24% (56/233) of home delivery users, the excess was planned with the hospital department. If the excess was not planned with the department, most users reported receiving too much medicine (23/76) or 'Other' (42/76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over half of the outpatients reported excess cost-free medication, with the largest excess linked to medication pickup lockers. Patients managing their own pickup tend to accumulate more. To minimise accumulation of medicine for personal use, it may be worth investigating whether deliveries through medication pickup lockers should be scheduled at fixed intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The increasing number of patients challenges healthcare and drives demand for home-based treatments. In the North Denmark Region, outpatients can acquire their hospital medication as 'cost-free medicine' through home delivery or medication pickup lockers. With a focus on home-based treatments and limited household medicine tracking, investigating medicine waste is crucial for resource optimisation. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of excess medication among outpatients in the North Denmark Region, whether there was an association between excess cost-free medicine and type of delivery method, and reasons for the excess.

Methods: This study included outpatients from the Department of Neurology or Department of Gastroenterology at Aalborg University Hospital receiving cost-free medication from March to October 2023. Eligible outpatients received a questionnaire via Digital Post. As medicine waste is difficult to measure directly, excess medication was used as a surrogate measure. Patient data were acquired through Apovision and stored in REDCap. Pearson's χ2 test was performed to examine the difference in excess medicine between medication pickup locker and home delivery.

Results: 52.8% (233/441) of outpatients reported excess cost-free medication at home. Medication pickup lockers, where 58.9% (132/224) reported an excess, were associated with larger medicine stocks at home compared with home delivery where 46.5% (101/217) reported excess (p=0.009). For 45.5% (106/233) of medicine pickup locker users and 24% (56/233) of home delivery users, the excess was planned with the hospital department. If the excess was not planned with the department, most users reported receiving too much medicine (23/76) or 'Other' (42/76).

Conclusions: Over half of the outpatients reported excess cost-free medication, with the largest excess linked to medication pickup lockers. Patients managing their own pickup tend to accumulate more. To minimise accumulation of medicine for personal use, it may be worth investigating whether deliveries through medication pickup lockers should be scheduled at fixed intervals.

送药方式类型对家庭医疗废弃物的影响:北丹麦地区门诊患者接受免费药品的问卷调查研究
目标:越来越多的患者对医疗保健提出了挑战,并推动了对家庭治疗的需求。在北丹麦地区,门诊病人可以通过送货上门或取药柜的方式获得医院的“免费药品”。由于重点是家庭治疗和有限的家庭药物跟踪,调查药物浪费对于资源优化至关重要。本研究旨在调查北丹麦地区门诊患者中过量用药的流行程度,是否存在过量免费药物与交付方式类型之间的关联,以及过量的原因。方法:本研究纳入2023年3月至10月在奥尔堡大学医院神经内科或消化内科接受免费药物治疗的门诊患者。合资格的门诊病人透过数码邮政收到问卷。由于药物浪费难以直接测量,因此使用过量药物作为替代测量。通过Apovision获取患者数据并存储在REDCap中。采用Pearson χ2检验检验取药柜与送药到家之间药物过量的差异。结果:52.8%(233/441)的门诊患者报告在家免费用药过量。58.9%(132/224)的取药柜报告药品库存过剩,与46.5%(101/217)的送药柜报告药品库存过剩相关(p=0.009)。45.5%(106/233)的取药柜用户和24%(56/233)的上门配送用户的多余部分是与医院部门计划的。如果过量用药不是医学部计划的,大多数服用者报告服用了过多的药物(23/76)或“其他”(42/76)。结论:超过一半的门诊患者报告了多余的免费药物,最大的多余与药物取物柜有关。病人自己捡东西往往会积累更多。为了最大限度地减少个人使用药物的积累,可能值得研究是否应该安排固定的时间间隔通过药物提取储物柜进行递送。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信