Co-production in community-based substance use disorder treatment services: a scoping review.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000001011
Joe Schofield, Susanna Galea-Singer, Alexander Mario Baldacchino
{"title":"Co-production in community-based substance use disorder treatment services: a scoping review.","authors":"Joe Schofield, Susanna Galea-Singer, Alexander Mario Baldacchino","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The personal and social harms from unmanaged substance use disorders (SUD) are substantial. Too few people with SUD are engaged in treatment, partly due to the acceptability and accessibility of services. Co-production - sharing power and decision-making between professionals and people with lived experience (PWLE) - could address barriers to improve uptake and outcomes of SUD treatment. This scoping review examined recent (01/09/2023-08/03/2025) literature on co-production in community SUD treatment services.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Co-production has been used to address barriers to care and co-design new interventions and services, especially for marginalised populations and groups with complex needs. Methods, processes, and the degree of meaningful involvement of PWLE varied across projects. Most work occurred in higher income countries and the impacts on PWLE were rarely explored.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Co-production is feasible and can inform the development of more patient-centred SUD treatment services. Projects should be grounded in theory and power differentials in decision-making addressed to ensure equitable and meaningful participation throughout the process. There is a need to explore co-production in the design and evaluation of general SUD treatment, sustainability, impacts on participants, and evaluation of long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"265-273"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000001011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The personal and social harms from unmanaged substance use disorders (SUD) are substantial. Too few people with SUD are engaged in treatment, partly due to the acceptability and accessibility of services. Co-production - sharing power and decision-making between professionals and people with lived experience (PWLE) - could address barriers to improve uptake and outcomes of SUD treatment. This scoping review examined recent (01/09/2023-08/03/2025) literature on co-production in community SUD treatment services.

Recent findings: Co-production has been used to address barriers to care and co-design new interventions and services, especially for marginalised populations and groups with complex needs. Methods, processes, and the degree of meaningful involvement of PWLE varied across projects. Most work occurred in higher income countries and the impacts on PWLE were rarely explored.

Summary: Co-production is feasible and can inform the development of more patient-centred SUD treatment services. Projects should be grounded in theory and power differentials in decision-making addressed to ensure equitable and meaningful participation throughout the process. There is a need to explore co-production in the design and evaluation of general SUD treatment, sustainability, impacts on participants, and evaluation of long-term outcomes.

社区物质使用障碍治疗服务的合作:范围审查。
综述目的:未经管理的物质使用障碍(SUD)对个人和社会的危害是巨大的。参与治疗的SUD患者太少,部分原因是服务的可接受性和可及性。联合生产——专业人员和有生活经验的人(PWLE)之间分享权力和决策——可以解决障碍,提高SUD治疗的吸收和效果。本综述研究了最近(2023年9月1日- 2025年3月8日)关于社区SUD治疗服务联合生产的文献。最近的发现:合作制作已用于解决护理障碍和共同设计新的干预措施和服务,特别是针对边缘人群和有复杂需求的群体。方法、过程和有意义的PWLE参与程度因项目而异。大多数工作发生在高收入国家,很少探讨对PWLE的影响。总结:联合生产是可行的,可以为更多以患者为中心的SUD治疗服务的发展提供信息。项目应以理论和解决决策中的权力差别为基础,以确保在整个过程中公平和有意义的参与。有必要在设计和评估一般SUD治疗、可持续性、对参与者的影响以及评估长期结果方面探索合作生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信