Impact of Periprocedural Statin Therapy on Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Aman Goyal, Surabhi Maheshwari, Yusra Mashkoor, Ajeet Singh, Faryal Rafique, Abu Baker Sheikh, Kamna Bansal
{"title":"Impact of Periprocedural Statin Therapy on Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.","authors":"Aman Goyal, Surabhi Maheshwari, Yusra Mashkoor, Ajeet Singh, Faryal Rafique, Abu Baker Sheikh, Kamna Bansal","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) stands as a notable alternative to surgical valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Despite the established benefits of statins in cardiovascular pathologies, their specific impact in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our meta-analysis aims to assess whether periprocedural statin therapy improves survival and outcomes post-TAVR, thus addressing this gap in literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search using various databases with relevant keywords terms was conducted to identify studies on the impact of periprocedural statin therapy on TAVR outcomes. We assessed the primary outcome of all-cause mortality alongside various secondary outcomes including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury (AKI), 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, rehospitalization, cardiovascular complications, and pacemaker requirement. A random-effects model using Comprehensive Meta Analysis Software was employed to analyze the data for each outcome. Statistical significance was set at a p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis of 19 observational studies revealed that periprocedural statin therapy significantly reduces all-cause mortality following TAVR surgery (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61-0.83, p < 0.001). However, the influence of statins on other outcomes remains inconclusive. These outcomes include stroke/TIA (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.68-1.19, p = 0.455), risk of MI (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.73-4.04, p = 0.214), AKI (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75-1.31, p = 0.968), 30-day mortality (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.46-1.10, p = 0.126), in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.13-1.38, p = 0.151), rehospitalization (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.66-1.29, p = 0.645), cardiovascular complications (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.91-1.37, p = 0.297), and pacemaker requirement (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.65-1.06, p = 0.133).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our meta-analysis indicates a potentially promising role for periprocedural statin therapy in enhancing patient outcomes post-TAVR surgery. We found a notable association between statin therapy and a reduction in all-cause mortality. However, the effects on secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance, which warrants further investigation through larger, well-designed, randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) stands as a notable alternative to surgical valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Despite the established benefits of statins in cardiovascular pathologies, their specific impact in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR remains uncertain.

Aims: Our meta-analysis aims to assess whether periprocedural statin therapy improves survival and outcomes post-TAVR, thus addressing this gap in literature.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search using various databases with relevant keywords terms was conducted to identify studies on the impact of periprocedural statin therapy on TAVR outcomes. We assessed the primary outcome of all-cause mortality alongside various secondary outcomes including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury (AKI), 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, rehospitalization, cardiovascular complications, and pacemaker requirement. A random-effects model using Comprehensive Meta Analysis Software was employed to analyze the data for each outcome. Statistical significance was set at a p < 0.05.

Results: Our analysis of 19 observational studies revealed that periprocedural statin therapy significantly reduces all-cause mortality following TAVR surgery (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61-0.83, p < 0.001). However, the influence of statins on other outcomes remains inconclusive. These outcomes include stroke/TIA (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.68-1.19, p = 0.455), risk of MI (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.73-4.04, p = 0.214), AKI (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75-1.31, p = 0.968), 30-day mortality (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.46-1.10, p = 0.126), in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.13-1.38, p = 0.151), rehospitalization (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.66-1.29, p = 0.645), cardiovascular complications (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.91-1.37, p = 0.297), and pacemaker requirement (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.65-1.06, p = 0.133).

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicates a potentially promising role for periprocedural statin therapy in enhancing patient outcomes post-TAVR surgery. We found a notable association between statin therapy and a reduction in all-cause mortality. However, the effects on secondary outcomes did not reach statistical significance, which warrants further investigation through larger, well-designed, randomized controlled trials.

围手术期他汀类药物治疗对经导管主动脉瓣置换术死亡率和心血管预后的影响:荟萃分析和荟萃回归
背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)是严重主动脉瓣狭窄(as)手术瓣膜置换术的重要替代方法。尽管他汀类药物对心血管疾病的疗效已得到证实,但其对严重AS患者接受TAVR的具体影响仍不确定。目的:我们的荟萃分析旨在评估围手术期他汀类药物治疗是否能改善tavr后的生存和预后,从而弥补文献中的这一空白。方法:综合检索各种数据库的相关关键词进行文献检索,确定围手术期他汀类药物治疗对TAVR结果影响的研究。我们评估了全因死亡率的主要结局以及各种次要结局,包括卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、心肌梗死、急性肾损伤(AKI)、30天死亡率、住院死亡率、再住院、心血管并发症和起搏器需求。采用综合Meta分析软件建立随机效应模型,对各结局数据进行分析。结果:我们对19项观察性研究的分析显示,他汀类药物围手术期治疗可显著降低TAVR手术后的全因死亡率(OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.61-0.83, p)。结论:我们的荟萃分析表明,他汀类药物围手术期治疗在提高TAVR手术后患者预后方面具有潜在的前景。我们发现他汀类药物治疗与全因死亡率降低之间存在显著关联。然而,对次要结局的影响没有达到统计学意义,这需要通过更大规模、设计良好的随机对照试验进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信