Mitoplastomic discordance in Brassicaceae phylogenomics confirms the complex evolutionary history of the family.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Lisa J M A Dominicus, Ihsan A Al-Shehbaz, Dmitry A German, Klaus Mummenhoff, Nikolai M Hay, Martin A Lysak, Marcus A Koch, Frederic Lens, Kasper P Hendriks
{"title":"Mitoplastomic discordance in Brassicaceae phylogenomics confirms the complex evolutionary history of the family.","authors":"Lisa J M A Dominicus, Ihsan A Al-Shehbaz, Dmitry A German, Klaus Mummenhoff, Nikolai M Hay, Martin A Lysak, Marcus A Koch, Frederic Lens, Kasper P Hendriks","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The phylogeny of the Brassicaceae family has traditionally been inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA. However, early studies were limited by the availability of genetic markers and incomplete taxon sampling. Recent phylogenomic studies, leveraging more densely sampled nuclear and plastid datasets, have resolved many taxonomic uncertainties. These studies either targeted complete plastomes or provided extensive representation of the nuclear genome. Nevertheless, substantial cytonuclear discordance, poorly resolved backbone relationships, and challenges placing 'rogue taxa' have left unresolved questions about deeper relationships, notably of the family's five supertribes. In this context, we performed the first phylogenomic analysis of the slower-evolving, maternally inherited mitogenome, which presents a promising avenue for resolving deeper phylogenetic nodes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using published mitogenomes from nine Brassicaceae species, we generated a mitogenomic reference file to recover mitogenomic sequencing read data from Hendriks et al. (2023). Subsequently, we reconstructed a codon-aware mitogenomic supermatrix, alongside updated nuclear (281 genes) and plastome (76 genes) supermatrices, and inferred family-wide maximum likelihood phylogenies from each of these three genomes. Congruence among the resulting phylogenies was thoroughly assessed.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We present the first densely sampled family-wide mitogenomic Brassicaceae phylogeny, including 167 species, 145 genera (40% of the family), and 40 tribes (69% of the family), and the first family-wide phylogenomic comparison based on all three plant genomes. While cytonuclear discordance was evident, we also uncovered strong phylogenomic discordance between the two organellar genomes-mitogenome and plastome-coined here as 'mitoplastomic discordance'. Our findings offer new insights into placing several rogue and previously unplaced taxa.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Phylogenomic discordance in Brassicaceae was more pervasive than expected. While bifurcating phylogenies offer clear evolutionary hypotheses, they do not fully capture evolutionary complexities. Our results have implications for understanding Brassicaceae evolution, taxonomy, and systematics, shedding light on processes like hybridisation and genome duplication, commonly resulting in evolutionary reticulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The phylogeny of the Brassicaceae family has traditionally been inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA. However, early studies were limited by the availability of genetic markers and incomplete taxon sampling. Recent phylogenomic studies, leveraging more densely sampled nuclear and plastid datasets, have resolved many taxonomic uncertainties. These studies either targeted complete plastomes or provided extensive representation of the nuclear genome. Nevertheless, substantial cytonuclear discordance, poorly resolved backbone relationships, and challenges placing 'rogue taxa' have left unresolved questions about deeper relationships, notably of the family's five supertribes. In this context, we performed the first phylogenomic analysis of the slower-evolving, maternally inherited mitogenome, which presents a promising avenue for resolving deeper phylogenetic nodes.

Methods: Using published mitogenomes from nine Brassicaceae species, we generated a mitogenomic reference file to recover mitogenomic sequencing read data from Hendriks et al. (2023). Subsequently, we reconstructed a codon-aware mitogenomic supermatrix, alongside updated nuclear (281 genes) and plastome (76 genes) supermatrices, and inferred family-wide maximum likelihood phylogenies from each of these three genomes. Congruence among the resulting phylogenies was thoroughly assessed.

Key results: We present the first densely sampled family-wide mitogenomic Brassicaceae phylogeny, including 167 species, 145 genera (40% of the family), and 40 tribes (69% of the family), and the first family-wide phylogenomic comparison based on all three plant genomes. While cytonuclear discordance was evident, we also uncovered strong phylogenomic discordance between the two organellar genomes-mitogenome and plastome-coined here as 'mitoplastomic discordance'. Our findings offer new insights into placing several rogue and previously unplaced taxa.

Conclusions: Phylogenomic discordance in Brassicaceae was more pervasive than expected. While bifurcating phylogenies offer clear evolutionary hypotheses, they do not fully capture evolutionary complexities. Our results have implications for understanding Brassicaceae evolution, taxonomy, and systematics, shedding light on processes like hybridisation and genome duplication, commonly resulting in evolutionary reticulation.

十字花科系统基因组学中有丝分裂不一致证实了该家族复杂的进化史。
背景与目的:十字花科植物的系统发育传统上是通过质体和核DNA来推断的。然而,早期的研究受到遗传标记的可用性和不完整的分类群抽样的限制。最近的系统基因组学研究,利用更密集采样的核和质体数据集,解决了许多分类上的不确定性。这些研究要么针对完整的质体,要么提供了核基因组的广泛代表。然而,大量的细胞核不一致,解决不了的骨干关系,以及确定“流氓分类群”的挑战,留下了关于更深层次关系的未解决的问题,特别是这个家族的五个超级部落。在这种背景下,我们对进化较慢的母系遗传有丝分裂基因组进行了首次系统基因组分析,这为解决更深层次的系统发育节点提供了一条有希望的途径。方法:利用已发表的9种十字花科植物的有丝分裂基因组,我们生成了一个有丝分裂基因组参考文件,以恢复Hendriks等人(2023)的有丝分裂基因组测序读取数据。随后,我们重建了一个密码子感知的有丝分裂基因组超基质,以及更新的核(281个基因)和质体(76个基因)超基质,并从这三个基因组中推断出全家族最大似然系统发育。所产生的系统发生之间的一致性被彻底评估。主要结果:我们首次对芸苔科植物进行了全科有丝分裂基因组系统发育的密集采样,包括167种,145属(占科的40%)和40个部落(占科的69%),以及基于所有三种植物基因组的全科系统基因组比较。虽然细胞核不一致是明显的,但我们也发现了两个细胞器基因组(有丝分裂基因组和质体基因组)之间强烈的系统基因组不一致,这里称之为“有丝分裂基因组不一致”。我们的发现为安置几个流浪和以前未安置的分类群提供了新的见解。结论:十字花科植物系统发育不一致性比预期的更为普遍。虽然分叉的系统发生提供了明确的进化假设,但它们并没有完全捕捉到进化的复杂性。我们的研究结果对理解十字花科植物的进化、分类学和系统学具有重要意义,揭示了杂交和基因组复制等过程,这些过程通常导致进化网状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信