Daniel Rudolf Muth, Pauline Scherm, Federico Acosta, Miroslav Brêzik, Fernando Benito, Martin Dirisamer, Siegfried Georg Priglinger, Frank Blaser, Sandrine Anne Zweifel, Wolfgang Johann Mayer
{"title":"Objective Quality Assessment of the Capsulorhexis - A Novel Augmented Reality Tool for Trainees and Experts.","authors":"Daniel Rudolf Muth, Pauline Scherm, Federico Acosta, Miroslav Brêzik, Fernando Benito, Martin Dirisamer, Siegfried Georg Priglinger, Frank Blaser, Sandrine Anne Zweifel, Wolfgang Johann Mayer","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2025.2504569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the usability of a smartphone-based augmented reality tool for capsulorhexis training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, prospective, clinical study conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Surgery-naïve residents were included and divided into three subgroups: (1) augmented reality supported by the Custom Surgical MicroREC system during their capsulorhexis procedures; (2) Expert support supported by an experienced cataract surgeon; (3) No support without support. Capsulorhexis quality was graded by circularity, centration, and radius.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one (<i>n</i><sub>total</sub> = 21) participants were enrolled. The augmented reality group was statistically significantly better in terms of circularity than the Expert support (Mann-Whitney's <i>U</i>-test: <i>p</i> = .00175) and the No support group (Mann-Whitney's <i>U</i>-test: <i>p</i> = .00268). The procedure duration decreased statistically significantly for all three groups when try 1 and 10 were compared (augmented reality: <i>p</i> < .0001; Expert support: <i>p</i> = .0099; No support: <i>p</i> < .0001). The other parameters did not differ statistically significantly. The questionnaires handed to the augmented reality and No support group before and after the wet lab revealed a high importance of wet lab trainings to all polled participants. The provided wet lab setup was considered adequate by both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Augmented reality can assist in cataract training. The Custom Surgical MicroREC system can have a positive influence on capsulorhexis quality in a training environment. Automated quality metrics measured by the augmented reality software provide an objective quality score of the performed surgical procedure. As the tested augmented reality system can be used in training as well as in a real-world setting, this will be a useful tool for trainees and expert surgeons alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2025.2504569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the usability of a smartphone-based augmented reality tool for capsulorhexis training.
Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, clinical study conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Surgery-naïve residents were included and divided into three subgroups: (1) augmented reality supported by the Custom Surgical MicroREC system during their capsulorhexis procedures; (2) Expert support supported by an experienced cataract surgeon; (3) No support without support. Capsulorhexis quality was graded by circularity, centration, and radius.
Results: Twenty-one (ntotal = 21) participants were enrolled. The augmented reality group was statistically significantly better in terms of circularity than the Expert support (Mann-Whitney's U-test: p = .00175) and the No support group (Mann-Whitney's U-test: p = .00268). The procedure duration decreased statistically significantly for all three groups when try 1 and 10 were compared (augmented reality: p < .0001; Expert support: p = .0099; No support: p < .0001). The other parameters did not differ statistically significantly. The questionnaires handed to the augmented reality and No support group before and after the wet lab revealed a high importance of wet lab trainings to all polled participants. The provided wet lab setup was considered adequate by both groups.
Conclusion: Augmented reality can assist in cataract training. The Custom Surgical MicroREC system can have a positive influence on capsulorhexis quality in a training environment. Automated quality metrics measured by the augmented reality software provide an objective quality score of the performed surgical procedure. As the tested augmented reality system can be used in training as well as in a real-world setting, this will be a useful tool for trainees and expert surgeons alike.
目的:评估基于智能手机的增强现实工具用于撕囊训练的可用性。方法:这是一项在德国慕尼黑大学附属医院眼科进行的单中心前瞻性临床研究。Surgery-naïve住院医生被纳入研究,并被分为三个亚组:(1)在撕囊过程中使用Custom Surgical MicroREC系统支持的增强现实技术;(2)由经验丰富的白内障外科医生提供专家支持;(3)没有支持就没有支持。撕囊质量按圆度、浓度和半径进行分级。结果:共入组21例(共21例)。增强现实组在圆度方面比专家支持组(Mann-Whitney's U-test: p = 0.00175)和无支持组(Mann-Whitney's U-test: p = 0.00268)有统计学上的显著性改善。当尝试1和10进行比较时,三组的手术持续时间均有统计学意义上的显著减少(增强现实:p p = 0.0099;结论:增强现实技术可以辅助白内障训练。定制外科MicroREC系统可以在培训环境中对撕囊质量产生积极影响。由增强现实软件测量的自动化质量指标为所执行的外科手术提供了客观的质量评分。由于经过测试的增强现实系统既可以用于培训,也可以用于现实环境,因此对于实习生和专家外科医生来说,这将是一个有用的工具。
期刊介绍:
The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.