The association between smoking status and aging cognitive trajectory accounting for bias in attrition.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rachel Stuckwisch, Aleena Bennett, Anaïs Rouanet, Lloyd J Edwards, Michael Crowe, Suzanne E Judd, D Leann Long
{"title":"The association between smoking status and aging cognitive trajectory accounting for bias in attrition.","authors":"Rachel Stuckwisch, Aleena Bennett, Anaïs Rouanet, Lloyd J Edwards, Michael Crowe, Suzanne E Judd, D Leann Long","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies on the relationship between smoking and cognition yield conflicting results, potentially from survival bias. We examined the effect of smoking status on cognitive evolution, accounting for potential bias in attrition. We analyzed 21 216 Black and White participants from the REGARDS cohort study. In order to account for potential differential attrition, a sensitivity analysis compared the association between smoking status and age-sex-specific composite cognitive trajectories using linear mixed models, robust under missing at random assumption, and joint models, robust under the extended missing at random assumptions. Linear mixed model results indicated current smokers had lower overall composite cognitive scores compared to never smokers at baseline (-0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.23, -0.16) and at 14-years duration in the study (-0.26, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.20), also apparent when comparing current smokers to past smokers, and memory and verbal fluency composite scores. Joint modeling estimates yielded results similar to results from linear mixed models. Joint models are recommended as a potential means to investigate concerns about attrition, particularly in studies of factors associated with both cognition and mortality. This study provides further support that smoking is likely to have negative impacts on cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on the relationship between smoking and cognition yield conflicting results, potentially from survival bias. We examined the effect of smoking status on cognitive evolution, accounting for potential bias in attrition. We analyzed 21 216 Black and White participants from the REGARDS cohort study. In order to account for potential differential attrition, a sensitivity analysis compared the association between smoking status and age-sex-specific composite cognitive trajectories using linear mixed models, robust under missing at random assumption, and joint models, robust under the extended missing at random assumptions. Linear mixed model results indicated current smokers had lower overall composite cognitive scores compared to never smokers at baseline (-0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.23, -0.16) and at 14-years duration in the study (-0.26, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.20), also apparent when comparing current smokers to past smokers, and memory and verbal fluency composite scores. Joint modeling estimates yielded results similar to results from linear mixed models. Joint models are recommended as a potential means to investigate concerns about attrition, particularly in studies of factors associated with both cognition and mortality. This study provides further support that smoking is likely to have negative impacts on cognition.

吸烟状况与衰老认知轨迹之间的关联,说明了损耗偏差。
关于吸烟和认知之间关系的研究产生了相互矛盾的结果,这可能是由于生存偏差。我们检查了吸烟状况对认知进化的影响,考虑到潜在的消耗偏差。我们分析了来自REGARDS队列研究的21 216名黑人和白人参与者。为了解释潜在的差异损耗,一项敏感性分析比较了吸烟状况与年龄-性别特异性复合认知轨迹之间的关系,使用线性混合模型(在随机缺失假设下具有鲁棒性)和联合模型(在扩展的随机缺失假设下具有鲁棒性)。线性混合模型结果表明,在基线(-0.20,95%可信区间(CI): -0.23, -0.16)和研究持续时间14年(-0.26,95% CI: -0.33, -0.20)时,当前吸烟者与过去吸烟者相比,与记忆和语言流畅性综合得分相比,当前吸烟者的总体综合认知得分较低。联合建模估计的结果与线性混合模型的结果相似。联合模型被推荐作为一种潜在的手段来调查对磨损的关注,特别是在研究与认知和死亡率相关的因素时。这项研究进一步支持了吸烟可能对认知产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信