Day-To-Day Endurance Training Periodization of World-Class Cross-Country Skiers

Jacob Walther, Jan Kocbach, Øyvind Sandbakk
{"title":"Day-To-Day Endurance Training Periodization of World-Class Cross-Country Skiers","authors":"Jacob Walther,&nbsp;Jan Kocbach,&nbsp;Øyvind Sandbakk","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to investigate the day-to-day endurance training periodization of male and female world-class cross-country skiers. Self-reported session-by-session training data from 17 (7 female) world-class cross-country skiers were retrospectively analyzed. The data were separated into general preparation (GP) and competition periods (CP), during which all skiers achieved world-class performance. Daily training volume was categorized as very low (0%–50% of mean daily volume), low (50%–100%), moderate (100%–150%), and high (≥ 150%). Training load (Training Impulse, TRIMP) was calculated as the product of duration and an intensity factor of 1, 2, or 3 for low-, moderate-, and high-intensity training, respectively. Training volume was distributed as 18%/22%/32%/28% across very low/low/moderate/high volume days during GP, whereas the corresponding distribution during CP was 23%/35%/32%/10%. Shifts in daily TRIMP from GP to CP mirrored changes in training volume. During GP, the acute-to-chronic work ratio (ACWR) was 0.75–1.25 on 69% of the days, with 13% of the days showing lower ratios and 18% higher. During CP, the corresponding values were 69%/19%/12%. Intensive sessions occurred every 3.6 ± 0.3 days during GP compared to every 3.0 ± 0.3 days during CP. Training volumes on the day before intensive sessions were 127 ± 13% (GP) and 99 ± 7% (CP) of the daily mean, whereas the corresponding values for the days after were 116 ± 8% and 87 ± 9%. These data provide new insights into day-to-day periodization in world-class cross-country skiers, highlighting the sequential application of training loads by alternating training days of high volume, elevated intensity every 3–4 days, or reduced training load or rest every 8–9 days, while only 5% combining volume and intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12322","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the day-to-day endurance training periodization of male and female world-class cross-country skiers. Self-reported session-by-session training data from 17 (7 female) world-class cross-country skiers were retrospectively analyzed. The data were separated into general preparation (GP) and competition periods (CP), during which all skiers achieved world-class performance. Daily training volume was categorized as very low (0%–50% of mean daily volume), low (50%–100%), moderate (100%–150%), and high (≥ 150%). Training load (Training Impulse, TRIMP) was calculated as the product of duration and an intensity factor of 1, 2, or 3 for low-, moderate-, and high-intensity training, respectively. Training volume was distributed as 18%/22%/32%/28% across very low/low/moderate/high volume days during GP, whereas the corresponding distribution during CP was 23%/35%/32%/10%. Shifts in daily TRIMP from GP to CP mirrored changes in training volume. During GP, the acute-to-chronic work ratio (ACWR) was 0.75–1.25 on 69% of the days, with 13% of the days showing lower ratios and 18% higher. During CP, the corresponding values were 69%/19%/12%. Intensive sessions occurred every 3.6 ± 0.3 days during GP compared to every 3.0 ± 0.3 days during CP. Training volumes on the day before intensive sessions were 127 ± 13% (GP) and 99 ± 7% (CP) of the daily mean, whereas the corresponding values for the days after were 116 ± 8% and 87 ± 9%. These data provide new insights into day-to-day periodization in world-class cross-country skiers, highlighting the sequential application of training loads by alternating training days of high volume, elevated intensity every 3–4 days, or reduced training load or rest every 8–9 days, while only 5% combining volume and intensity.

世界级越野滑雪运动员的日常耐力训练周期
本研究旨在探讨男女世界级越野滑雪运动员的日常耐力训练周期。回顾性分析了17名世界级越野滑雪运动员(7名女性)每次训练的自我报告数据。数据被分为一般准备期(GP)和比赛期(CP),在此期间所有的滑雪者都达到了世界级的水平。每日训练量分为极低(每日平均训练量的0%-50%)、低(50%-100%)、中(100%-150%)和高(≥150%)。对于低强度、中等强度和高强度训练,训练负荷(训练冲量,TRIMP)分别计算为持续时间和强度因子1、2或3的乘积。在GP期间的极低/低/中/高量日的训练量分布为18%/22%/32%/28%,而在CP期间的相应分布为23%/35%/32%/10%。每日TRIMP从GP到CP的变化反映了训练量的变化。在GP期间,69%的工作日的急慢性工作比(ACWR)为0.75-1.25,其中13%的工作日较低,18%的工作日较高。CP期间相应值分别为69%/19%/12%。强化训练在GP期间每3.6±0.3天进行一次,而在CP期间每3.0±0.3天进行一次。强化训练前一天的训练量为每日平均值的127±13% (GP)和99±7% (CP),强化训练后的相应值为116±8%和87±9%。这些数据为世界级越野滑雪运动员的日常周期提供了新的见解,强调了训练负荷的顺序应用,即每3-4天交替进行高强度训练,或每8-9天减少训练负荷或休息,而只有5%的人将量和强度结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信