Socio-ecological domains and adolescent mental health: An application of the dual-factor model

IF 4.6 2区心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES

Journal of Research on Adolescence Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1111/jora.70029

Theda Rose, Sharon Lambert, Chang Liu, Radhika S. Raghunathan, Rashelle J. Musci, Alexandra D. W. Sullivan, Kristen Lyall, Amy J. Elliott, Cindy T. McEvoy, Jean A. Frazier, Gayle M. Shipp, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell, Jody M. Ganiban, ECHO Cohort Consortium

{"title":"Socio-ecological domains and adolescent mental health: An application of the dual-factor model","authors":"Theda Rose, Sharon Lambert, Chang Liu, Radhika S. Raghunathan, Rashelle J. Musci, Alexandra D. W. Sullivan, Kristen Lyall, Amy J. Elliott, Cindy T. McEvoy, Jean A. Frazier, Gayle M. Shipp, Daphne Koinis-Mitchell, Jody M. Ganiban, ECHO Cohort Consortium","doi":"10.1111/jora.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Comprehensive assessment of mental health includes wellbeing and psychopathology. Using the dual-factor model of mental health, this study explored associations between socioecological domains and mental health profiles and subsequent moderations by sex, race and ethnicity, and age. Cross-sectional data were from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohort (<i>N</i> = 2826). Adolescents were 11–17 years old (mean age 14.4 ± 2.1), 55.3% non-Hispanic White, and 48% girls. Using latent profile analysis, four mental health groups were identified: positive mental health; parent-endorsed symptoms, but content; vulnerable; and troubled. Latent regression analyses showed that, overall, better family, peer, and teacher-school relationships were found in the positive mental health group compared with other groups. No significant moderations were observed. Implications for practice and policy are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jora.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.70029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive assessment of mental health includes wellbeing and psychopathology. Using the dual-factor model of mental health, this study explored associations between socioecological domains and mental health profiles and subsequent moderations by sex, race and ethnicity, and age. Cross-sectional data were from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohort (N = 2826). Adolescents were 11–17 years old (mean age 14.4 ± 2.1), 55.3% non-Hispanic White, and 48% girls. Using latent profile analysis, four mental health groups were identified: positive mental health; parent-endorsed symptoms, but content; vulnerable; and troubled. Latent regression analyses showed that, overall, better family, peer, and teacher-school relationships were found in the positive mental health group compared with other groups. No significant moderations were observed. Implications for practice and policy are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

社会生态领域与青少年心理健康：双因素模型的应用

心理健康的综合评估包括幸福感和精神病理学。利用心理健康的双因素模型，本研究探讨了社会生态领域与心理健康状况之间的关系，以及性别、种族和民族以及年龄的调节作用。横断面数据来自环境对儿童健康结局的影响（ECHO）队列（N = 2826）。青少年11-17岁（平均年龄14.4±2.1岁），非西班牙裔白人55.3%，女孩48%。利用潜在特征分析，确定了四个心理健康群体：积极心理健康群体；父母认可症状，但内容；脆弱的;和陷入困境。潜在回归分析显示，总体而言，与其他组相比，积极心理健康组的家庭、同伴和师生关系更好。没有观察到明显的缓和。对实践和政策的启示进行了讨论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Research on Adolescence Multiple-

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.