Performance of pre-trained deep learning models for land use land cover classification using remote sensing imaging datasets

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Irfan Haider, Muhammad Attique Khan, Saleha Masood, Shabbab Ali Algamdi, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui, Yunyoung Nam
{"title":"Performance of pre-trained deep learning models for land use land cover classification using remote sensing imaging datasets","authors":"Irfan Haider,&nbsp;Muhammad Attique Khan,&nbsp;Saleha Masood,&nbsp;Shabbab Ali Algamdi,&nbsp;Areej Alasiry,&nbsp;Mehrez Marzougui,&nbsp;Yunyoung Nam","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12317-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a comparative analysis of ten pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models, evaluated across three remote sensing datasets: EuroSat, NWPU, and Earth Hazards (Land Sliding). We investigate the interplay between model architecture and classifier selection by incorporating five different neural network (NN) classifiers, emphasizing their impact on predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. Due to its densely connected architecture, DenseNet201 achieved the highest accuracy—97% on EuroSat, 99.40% on NWPU, and 97.80% on Earth Hazards. In contrast, MobileNetV2, while slightly less accurate, demonstrated superior computational efficiency, recording the shortest prediction times of 39.943 s on EuroSat, 27.482 s on NWPU, and 2.8986 s on Earth Hazards. Additionally, classifier choice significantly influenced performance, with the Wide NN classifier excelling in diverse datasets and the Medium NN classifier optimizing speed. Our findings underscore the importance of balancing accuracy and efficiency in selecting CNN models for remote sensing applications, suggesting future research should explore ensembling techniques and lightweight models to enhance performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12317-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of ten pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models, evaluated across three remote sensing datasets: EuroSat, NWPU, and Earth Hazards (Land Sliding). We investigate the interplay between model architecture and classifier selection by incorporating five different neural network (NN) classifiers, emphasizing their impact on predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. Due to its densely connected architecture, DenseNet201 achieved the highest accuracy—97% on EuroSat, 99.40% on NWPU, and 97.80% on Earth Hazards. In contrast, MobileNetV2, while slightly less accurate, demonstrated superior computational efficiency, recording the shortest prediction times of 39.943 s on EuroSat, 27.482 s on NWPU, and 2.8986 s on Earth Hazards. Additionally, classifier choice significantly influenced performance, with the Wide NN classifier excelling in diverse datasets and the Medium NN classifier optimizing speed. Our findings underscore the importance of balancing accuracy and efficiency in selecting CNN models for remote sensing applications, suggesting future research should explore ensembling techniques and lightweight models to enhance performance.

基于遥感影像数据集的土地利用土地覆盖分类预训练深度学习模型的性能
本研究对十种预训练卷积神经网络(CNN)模型进行了比较分析,并对三种遥感数据集进行了评估:EuroSat、NWPU和Earth Hazards (Land Sliding)。我们通过整合五种不同的神经网络(NN)分类器来研究模型架构和分类器选择之间的相互作用,强调它们对预测精度和计算效率的影响。由于其密集连接的结构,DenseNet201达到了最高的精度-在EuroSat上达到97%,在NWPU上达到99.40%,在Earth Hazards上达到97.80%。相比之下,MobileNetV2虽然精度略低,但计算效率更高,在EuroSat、NWPU和Earth Hazards上的预测时间最短,分别为39.943 s、27.482 s和2.8986 s。此外,分类器的选择显著影响性能,宽神经网络分类器在不同的数据集上表现出色,而中等神经网络分类器的优化速度更快。我们的研究结果强调了在遥感应用中选择CNN模型时平衡精度和效率的重要性,建议未来的研究应探索集成技术和轻量级模型以提高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信