Identification of predictors responsible for neonatal sepsis and development of a diagnostic model

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shravya S. , Krishnakumar Athavil , Leslie Edward S. Lewis , Sreedharan N. , Vijayanarayana Kunhikatta
{"title":"Identification of predictors responsible for neonatal sepsis and development of a diagnostic model","authors":"Shravya S. ,&nbsp;Krishnakumar Athavil ,&nbsp;Leslie Edward S. Lewis ,&nbsp;Sreedharan N. ,&nbsp;Vijayanarayana Kunhikatta","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neonatal sepsis must be diagnosed and treated earliest to avoid potential consequences. we aimed to develop a diagnostic model by identifying the risk factors responsible for neonatal sepsis and comparing the diagnostic values of C-reactive protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT), and platelets.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-centre case-control study for five years on 300 neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The study included neonates diagnosed with sepsis as the “case” and those without sepsis as the “control” group. Data regarding clinical and demographic characteristics were collected retrospectively from medical records. The risk factors responsible for neonatal sepsis were identified using logistic regression, and the diagnostic performance of biomarkers CRP, PCT and platelets were compared by determining their sensitivity, specificity and the AUC of the ROC curve. Subsequently, the diagnostic model for neonatal sepsis was brought about using the identified risk factors and values of CRP, PCT and platelets.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CRP was the biomarker studied with the highest sensitivity (65.32 %) and specificity (85.37 %) among CRP, PCT and platelets. The highest AUC value (0.811) on ROC curve analysis was also exhibited by CRP. Additionally, the independent risk factors identified for the development of neonatal sepsis were the bodyweight category, gestational age category, and CRP levels (<em>p &lt; 0.05)</em> using multivariate logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CRP is the most dependable predictor for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in the study. Factors like body weight and gestational age contribute to the development of neonatal sepsis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 102074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425001630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neonatal sepsis must be diagnosed and treated earliest to avoid potential consequences. we aimed to develop a diagnostic model by identifying the risk factors responsible for neonatal sepsis and comparing the diagnostic values of C-reactive protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT), and platelets.

Methods

We conducted a single-centre case-control study for five years on 300 neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The study included neonates diagnosed with sepsis as the “case” and those without sepsis as the “control” group. Data regarding clinical and demographic characteristics were collected retrospectively from medical records. The risk factors responsible for neonatal sepsis were identified using logistic regression, and the diagnostic performance of biomarkers CRP, PCT and platelets were compared by determining their sensitivity, specificity and the AUC of the ROC curve. Subsequently, the diagnostic model for neonatal sepsis was brought about using the identified risk factors and values of CRP, PCT and platelets.

Results

CRP was the biomarker studied with the highest sensitivity (65.32 %) and specificity (85.37 %) among CRP, PCT and platelets. The highest AUC value (0.811) on ROC curve analysis was also exhibited by CRP. Additionally, the independent risk factors identified for the development of neonatal sepsis were the bodyweight category, gestational age category, and CRP levels (p < 0.05) using multivariate logistic regression.

Conclusion

CRP is the most dependable predictor for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in the study. Factors like body weight and gestational age contribute to the development of neonatal sepsis.
确定预测负责新生儿败血症和发展的诊断模型
背景:新生儿脓毒症必须尽早诊断和治疗,以避免潜在的后果。我们旨在通过确定新生儿败血症的危险因素,并比较c反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)和血小板的诊断价值,建立一种诊断模型。方法我们对300名新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的新生儿进行了为期5年的单中心病例对照研究。该研究将诊断为败血症的新生儿作为“病例”,将未诊断为败血症的新生儿作为“对照组”。有关临床和人口学特征的数据回顾性地从医疗记录中收集。采用logistic回归分析确定新生儿脓毒症的危险因素,并比较CRP、PCT、血小板等生物标志物的诊断性能,确定其敏感性、特异性和ROC曲线的AUC。随后,利用确定的危险因素及CRP、PCT、血小板值,建立新生儿脓毒症的诊断模型。结果scrp在CRP、PCT和血小板中具有最高的敏感性(65.32%)和特异性(85.37%)。ROC曲线分析中,CRP的AUC值最高,为0.811。此外,确定新生儿脓毒症发展的独立危险因素是体重类别、胎龄类别和CRP水平(p <;0.05)。结论crp是诊断新生儿败血症最可靠的指标。体重和胎龄等因素有助于新生儿败血症的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信