Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Elliott Mark Weiss , Benjamin S. Wilfond , Stephanie A. Kraft
{"title":"Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences","authors":"Elliott Mark Weiss ,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Wilfond ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Kraft","doi":"10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Whether to participate in clinical research is a special type of decision for parents with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Parents often report negative experiences being approached for NICU research and researchers struggle to enroll a representative sample. We consider how enrollment decision-making might be better supported by integrating learnings from clinical decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Finding</h3><div>Approaches to supporting decision-making about clinical research, though distinct from those for clinical decision-making, share many similarities. We consider ways researchers may incorporate advances in knowledge about clinical decision-making to: (a) improve documents used for regulatory purposes (e.g., consent forms), and (b) better support relationship building between researchers and parents considering research enrollment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Researchers may benefit from considering approaches to enrollment decision-making that draw on clinical decision-making methods. Future work should assess the impact of such approaches on parental experiences of recruitment; enrollment and retention rates; and representative inclusion of NICU populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21761,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in perinatology","volume":"49 3","pages":"Article 152055"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146000525000321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Whether to participate in clinical research is a special type of decision for parents with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Parents often report negative experiences being approached for NICU research and researchers struggle to enroll a representative sample. We consider how enrollment decision-making might be better supported by integrating learnings from clinical decision-making.

Finding

Approaches to supporting decision-making about clinical research, though distinct from those for clinical decision-making, share many similarities. We consider ways researchers may incorporate advances in knowledge about clinical decision-making to: (a) improve documents used for regulatory purposes (e.g., consent forms), and (b) better support relationship building between researchers and parents considering research enrollment.

Conclusion

Researchers may benefit from considering approaches to enrollment decision-making that draw on clinical decision-making methods. Future work should assess the impact of such approaches on parental experiences of recruitment; enrollment and retention rates; and representative inclusion of NICU populations.
面向围产期临床研究更好的招生决策:重新考虑招募和同意过程,以支持家庭价值观和偏好
目的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)患儿家长是否参与临床研究是一种特殊类型的决策。父母经常报告为新生儿重症监护室研究接触的负面经历,研究人员很难招募有代表性的样本。我们考虑如何通过整合临床决策的学习来更好地支持入组决策。支持临床研究决策的方法虽然不同于临床决策的方法,但有许多相似之处。我们考虑研究人员如何将临床决策知识的进步纳入以下方面:(a)改进用于监管目的的文件(例如,同意书);(b)更好地支持研究人员和考虑研究入组的家长之间建立关系。结论考虑借鉴临床决策方法的入组决策方法对研究人员有益。未来的工作应评估这些方法对父母招聘经历的影响;入学率和保有率;并纳入有代表性的新生儿重症监护病房人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in perinatology
Seminars in perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of each issue of Seminars in Perinatology is to provide authoritative and comprehensive reviews of a single topic of interest to professionals who care for the mother, the fetus, and the newborn. The journal''s readership includes perinatologists, obstetricians, pediatricians, epidemiologists, students in these fields, and others. Each issue offers a comprehensive review of an individual topic, with emphasis on new developments that will have a direct impact on their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信