Regulating antimicrobial resistance in the environment: analysis of Thailand legal framework and areas for reinforcement

Angkana Lekagul , Saowapa Khotchalai , Wanwisa Kaewkhankhaeng , Mary Gordoncillo , Fuangfa Utrarachkij , Viroj Tangcharoensathien
{"title":"Regulating antimicrobial resistance in the environment: analysis of Thailand legal framework and areas for reinforcement","authors":"Angkana Lekagul ,&nbsp;Saowapa Khotchalai ,&nbsp;Wanwisa Kaewkhankhaeng ,&nbsp;Mary Gordoncillo ,&nbsp;Fuangfa Utrarachkij ,&nbsp;Viroj Tangcharoensathien","doi":"10.1016/j.soh.2025.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global health issue, exacerbated by extensive antimicrobial use across human, animal, and plant sectors. The environment plays a crucial role in AMR emergence and spread due to the contamination from resistant bacteria, resistance genes, and antimicrobial residues from various sources. In Thailand, the regulatory framework that can reinforce AMR mitigation in environmental settings remains underdeveloped. This study aims to analyse the existing regulatory framework for environmental AMR control by identifying regulatory gaps and assessing the challenges of implementing these regulations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative approach was employed, combining a literature review and semi-structured interviews with 28 key informants from diverse regulatory sectors, including the ministries of health, agriculture, and environment. This included multi-level stakeholders at national, provincial, and local levels, as well as selected farmers. Content analysis of interview transcripts and regulatory documents was performed to triangulate findings on regulatory gaps and implementation barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study identified five regulatory categories governing water contamination across settings: rivers/canals, hospital wastewater, household wastewater, industrial waste (including pharmaceuticals), and animal farms. While the regulatory frameworks guide pollution standards, regulations lack provisions specific to AMR, highlighting a significant gap in AMR oversight and data on AMR pathogens in environmental wastewater. Key barriers include insufficient incorporation of AMR indicators in routine monitoring, limited enforcement, and inadequate technical and budgetary support.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Thailand's current environmental AMR framework lacks comprehensive AMR-specific regulations and robust enforcement mechanisms. Addressing these gaps requires multi-sectoral coordination, enhanced funding, and capacity-building initiatives. By prioritizing indicator development and establishing AMR-focused policies, Thailand can enhance its environmental AMR control measures and contribute to global AMR mitigation efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101146,"journal":{"name":"Science in One Health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704325000071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global health issue, exacerbated by extensive antimicrobial use across human, animal, and plant sectors. The environment plays a crucial role in AMR emergence and spread due to the contamination from resistant bacteria, resistance genes, and antimicrobial residues from various sources. In Thailand, the regulatory framework that can reinforce AMR mitigation in environmental settings remains underdeveloped. This study aims to analyse the existing regulatory framework for environmental AMR control by identifying regulatory gaps and assessing the challenges of implementing these regulations.

Methods

A qualitative approach was employed, combining a literature review and semi-structured interviews with 28 key informants from diverse regulatory sectors, including the ministries of health, agriculture, and environment. This included multi-level stakeholders at national, provincial, and local levels, as well as selected farmers. Content analysis of interview transcripts and regulatory documents was performed to triangulate findings on regulatory gaps and implementation barriers.

Results

The study identified five regulatory categories governing water contamination across settings: rivers/canals, hospital wastewater, household wastewater, industrial waste (including pharmaceuticals), and animal farms. While the regulatory frameworks guide pollution standards, regulations lack provisions specific to AMR, highlighting a significant gap in AMR oversight and data on AMR pathogens in environmental wastewater. Key barriers include insufficient incorporation of AMR indicators in routine monitoring, limited enforcement, and inadequate technical and budgetary support.

Conclusion

Thailand's current environmental AMR framework lacks comprehensive AMR-specific regulations and robust enforcement mechanisms. Addressing these gaps requires multi-sectoral coordination, enhanced funding, and capacity-building initiatives. By prioritizing indicator development and establishing AMR-focused policies, Thailand can enhance its environmental AMR control measures and contribute to global AMR mitigation efforts.
调节环境中的抗菌素耐药性:泰国法律框架和需要加强的领域的分析
抗生素耐药性(AMR)是一个紧迫的全球卫生问题,人类、动物和植物部门广泛使用抗菌药物加剧了这一问题。由于耐药细菌、耐药基因和各种来源的抗菌素残留物的污染,环境在抗菌素耐药性的出现和传播中起着至关重要的作用。在泰国,能够在环境环境中加强抗生素耐药性缓解的监管框架仍然不发达。本研究旨在通过识别监管缺口和评估实施这些法规的挑战,分析现有的环境AMR控制监管框架。方法采用定性方法,结合文献综述和对来自不同监管部门(包括卫生部、农业部和环境部)的28名关键举报人的半结构化访谈。这包括国家、省和地方各级的多层次利益相关者,以及选定的农民。对访谈记录和监管文件进行内容分析,对监管差距和实施障碍的发现进行三角测量。研究确定了五个管理水污染的监管类别:河流/运河、医院废水、家庭废水、工业废水(包括药品)和动物农场。虽然监管框架指导了污染标准,但法规缺乏针对抗菌素耐药性的具体规定,这突显出在抗菌素耐药性监督和环境废水中抗菌素耐药性病原体数据方面存在重大差距。主要障碍包括在常规监测中纳入抗微生物药物耐药性指标不足、执法有限以及技术和预算支持不足。泰国目前的环境抗菌素耐药性框架缺乏全面的抗菌素耐药性具体法规和强有力的执行机制。解决这些差距需要多部门协调、增加资金和能力建设举措。通过优先制定指标和制定以抗菌素耐药性为重点的政策,泰国可以加强抗菌素耐药性的环境控制措施,并为全球抗菌素耐药性缓解努力作出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信