Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Matheus de Oliveira Andrade , Otavio de Carvalho Modaffar Al-Alam , Henrique Jin Son Kim , João Pedro Thimotheo Batista , Débora Maciel Santana Dornellas , Ricardo Lima Coelho , Vitória Espíndola Leite Borges , Mariana Carvalho Gouveia , Mariana Scaranti , Renata Colombo Bonadio , Stephanie Gaillard , Samantha Cabral Severino Costa
{"title":"Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Matheus de Oliveira Andrade ,&nbsp;Otavio de Carvalho Modaffar Al-Alam ,&nbsp;Henrique Jin Son Kim ,&nbsp;João Pedro Thimotheo Batista ,&nbsp;Débora Maciel Santana Dornellas ,&nbsp;Ricardo Lima Coelho ,&nbsp;Vitória Espíndola Leite Borges ,&nbsp;Mariana Carvalho Gouveia ,&nbsp;Mariana Scaranti ,&nbsp;Renata Colombo Bonadio ,&nbsp;Stephanie Gaillard ,&nbsp;Samantha Cabral Severino Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2025.102959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The addition of induction chemotherapy (ICT) prior to concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is controversial, as trials have yielded conflicting results. This study aims to evaluate the role of ICT followed by CCRT in LACC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for studies with patients diagnosed with LACC receiving ICT followed by CCRT. Studies that included surgery, definitive radiotherapy (without concurrent chemotherapy), or immunotherapy were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 5,282 screened studies, 20 met the inclusion criteria, representing 1,543 patients treated with ICT. A <em>meta</em>-analysis of the five controlled studies exhibited high heterogeneity in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), driven by the CIRCE trial — a study employing a platinum–gemcitabine ICT regimen lasting &gt; 6 weeks. Sensitivity analysis excluding this trial demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.46; 95 % CI 0.31–0.69; p = 0.0002) and OS (HR 0.68; 95 % CI 0.47–0.99; p = 0.049) with the addition of ICT to CCRT, compared to CCRT alone. Meta-analysis of proportions revealed a 2-year OS of 84.1 % for studies utilizing platinum–paclitaxel compared to 72.2 % for platinum–gemcitabine (p-value for subgroup difference = 0.022). Studies with ICT duration of ≤ 6 weeks showed a 2-year OS of 84.8 % compared to 71.7 % for ICT duration &gt; 6 weeks (p = 0.003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In patients with LACC, ICT + CCRT significantly improves PFS and OS compared to CCRT alone, provided that the ICT involves a platinum doublet with paclitaxel and is administered within ≤ 6 weeks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 102959"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737225000817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The addition of induction chemotherapy (ICT) prior to concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is controversial, as trials have yielded conflicting results. This study aims to evaluate the role of ICT followed by CCRT in LACC.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for studies with patients diagnosed with LACC receiving ICT followed by CCRT. Studies that included surgery, definitive radiotherapy (without concurrent chemotherapy), or immunotherapy were excluded.

Results

Among 5,282 screened studies, 20 met the inclusion criteria, representing 1,543 patients treated with ICT. A meta-analysis of the five controlled studies exhibited high heterogeneity in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), driven by the CIRCE trial — a study employing a platinum–gemcitabine ICT regimen lasting > 6 weeks. Sensitivity analysis excluding this trial demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.46; 95 % CI 0.31–0.69; p = 0.0002) and OS (HR 0.68; 95 % CI 0.47–0.99; p = 0.049) with the addition of ICT to CCRT, compared to CCRT alone. Meta-analysis of proportions revealed a 2-year OS of 84.1 % for studies utilizing platinum–paclitaxel compared to 72.2 % for platinum–gemcitabine (p-value for subgroup difference = 0.022). Studies with ICT duration of ≤ 6 weeks showed a 2-year OS of 84.8 % compared to 71.7 % for ICT duration > 6 weeks (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

In patients with LACC, ICT + CCRT significantly improves PFS and OS compared to CCRT alone, provided that the ICT involves a platinum doublet with paclitaxel and is administered within ≤ 6 weeks.
局部晚期宫颈癌诱导化疗后放化疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:在联合放化疗(CCRT)之前加入诱导化疗(ICT)治疗局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)是有争议的,因为试验得出了相互矛盾的结果。本研究旨在评估资讯及通讯科技(ICT)与资讯科技(CCRT)在LACC中的作用。方法系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane,检索诊断为LACC的患者接受ICT和CCRT的研究。包括手术、明确放疗(无同期化疗)或免疫治疗的研究被排除在外。结果在5282项筛选研究中,20项符合纳入标准,代表1543例接受ICT治疗的患者。五项对照研究的荟萃分析显示,在CIRCE试验的推动下,无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)具有高度异质性。6周。排除该试验的敏感性分析显示PFS显著改善(HR 0.46;95% ci 0.31-0.69;p = 0.0002)和OS (HR 0.68;95% ci 0.47-0.99;p = 0.049),与单独使用CCRT相比。比例荟萃分析显示,使用铂-紫杉醇的研究的2年OS为84.1%,而铂-吉西他滨的研究为72.2%(亚组p值差异= 0.022)。ICT持续时间≤6周的研究显示,2年OS为84.8%,而ICT持续时间为71.7%;6周(p = 0.003)。结论在LACC患者中,ICT + CCRT相比单独CCRT显著改善PFS和OS,前提是ICT涉及铂双药与紫杉醇,且在≤6周内给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信