Efficiency of buffer zones in nutrient load reduction under climate change conditions (Nurzec River, eastern Poland)

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Damian Bojanowski , Paulina Orlińska-Woźniak , Paweł Wilk , Agnieszka Wypych , Ewa Szalińska
{"title":"Efficiency of buffer zones in nutrient load reduction under climate change conditions (Nurzec River, eastern Poland)","authors":"Damian Bojanowski ,&nbsp;Paulina Orlińska-Woźniak ,&nbsp;Paweł Wilk ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Wypych ,&nbsp;Ewa Szalińska","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Buffer zones are considered as the most common measures aimed at reducing nutrient loadings into aquatic environments. Assessment of their effectiveness, especially under climate change scenarios, is crucial for planning future mitigation measures, and implementation of the Water Framework Directive. The goal of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of buffer zone implementation in the Nurzec River catchment (eastern Poland) under current and future climate conditions. Nutrient loads were modelled with the use of the SWAT model (Soil &amp; Water Assessment Tool), and simulated influences of four buffer zone widths (2, 5, 10, and 20 m) using an inbuilt SWAT model option (FILTERW). All variants were examined using climate change scenarios (RCP4.5 and 8.5) in three-time horizons (2026–2050, 2051–2075, and 2076–2100), resulting in 35 individual model settings. Implementation of buffer zones in the study area reduced nutrient loads by approximately 27–55 % and 19–37 % for total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP), respectively, depending on the increase of buffer width. These values correspond with a reduction of 396.7 and 18.6 tons per year of TN and TP, respectively. Moreover, our results show that climate change will have an ambiguous impact on nutrient loads (TN decrease and TP increase). Despite these differences, we forecast that the effectiveness of the implemented buffer zones will be maintained at 66 % and 30 % for TN and TP, respectively. Even more important in our research is the detailed information on the effectiveness of the described research, which is a significant step forward in the use of model analyses of water quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 109183"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225004850","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Buffer zones are considered as the most common measures aimed at reducing nutrient loadings into aquatic environments. Assessment of their effectiveness, especially under climate change scenarios, is crucial for planning future mitigation measures, and implementation of the Water Framework Directive. The goal of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of buffer zone implementation in the Nurzec River catchment (eastern Poland) under current and future climate conditions. Nutrient loads were modelled with the use of the SWAT model (Soil & Water Assessment Tool), and simulated influences of four buffer zone widths (2, 5, 10, and 20 m) using an inbuilt SWAT model option (FILTERW). All variants were examined using climate change scenarios (RCP4.5 and 8.5) in three-time horizons (2026–2050, 2051–2075, and 2076–2100), resulting in 35 individual model settings. Implementation of buffer zones in the study area reduced nutrient loads by approximately 27–55 % and 19–37 % for total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP), respectively, depending on the increase of buffer width. These values correspond with a reduction of 396.7 and 18.6 tons per year of TN and TP, respectively. Moreover, our results show that climate change will have an ambiguous impact on nutrient loads (TN decrease and TP increase). Despite these differences, we forecast that the effectiveness of the implemented buffer zones will be maintained at 66 % and 30 % for TN and TP, respectively. Even more important in our research is the detailed information on the effectiveness of the described research, which is a significant step forward in the use of model analyses of water quality.

Abstract Image

气候变化条件下缓冲带减少养分负荷的效率(波兰东部Nurzec河)
缓冲区被认为是旨在减少进入水生环境的养分负荷的最常见措施。评估其有效性,特别是在气候变化情景下的有效性,对于规划未来的缓解措施和执行《水框架指令》至关重要。本研究的目的是评估在当前和未来气候条件下,在Nurzec河流域(波兰东部)实施缓冲区的潜在影响。养分负荷采用SWAT模型(Soil &;水评估工具),并使用内置SWAT模型选项(FILTERW)模拟四种缓冲区宽度(2、5、10和20米)的影响。利用三个时间尺度(2026-2050年、2051-2075年和2076-2100年)的气候变化情景(RCP4.5和8.5)对所有变异体进行了检验,产生了35个单独的模式设置。随着缓冲带宽度的增加,研究区总氮(TN)和总磷(TP)的养分负荷分别减少了约27 - 55%和19 - 37%。这些值对应的全氮和总磷分别减少396.7和18.6吨/年。此外,我们的研究结果表明,气候变化对养分负荷的影响是模糊的(TN减少,TP增加)。尽管存在这些差异,我们预测实施的缓冲区对总氮和总磷的有效性将分别保持在66%和30%。在我们的研究中更重要的是关于所描述的研究有效性的详细信息,这是在使用水质模型分析方面向前迈出的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信