Wind erosion-induced soil sediment and organic carbon loss under various land management practices in western U.S. Rangeland

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
G. Cho , T.A. Abitew , S. Calabrese , J. Jeong
{"title":"Wind erosion-induced soil sediment and organic carbon loss under various land management practices in western U.S. Rangeland","authors":"G. Cho ,&nbsp;T.A. Abitew ,&nbsp;S. Calabrese ,&nbsp;J. Jeong","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rangelands in the western United States play a crucial role in maintaining air quality but are highly vulnerable to wind erosion due to low soil moisture and sparse vegetation. Soil serves as a carbon sink, yet its erosion releases significant carbon into the atmosphere, exacerbating climate change. Effective conservation policies require accurate physics-based modeling of wind erosion rates. This study integrates the Landscape Wind Erosion (LWE) module into the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model to simulate wind-driven soil erosion and carbon loss under various management scenarios. Three representative sites–Jornada (New Mexico), Moab (Utah), and San Luis Valley (Colorado)–were selected for evaluation. At 0.39 t/ha/yr benchmark scenario wind erosion, a 10 % increasing vegetation reduced erosion by 40 %, while a 10 % decrease raised it by 80 %. These findings also extend to SOC losses, showing 1.4 t C/ha over 20 years, dropping to 0.8 with a 10 % vegetation increase and rising to 3.7 with a 10 % decrease. This highlights that conservation policies focused on preserving vegetation are more effective than recovery efforts in mitigating erosion. Additionally, although sites with higher vegetation cover had lower erosion rates, they experienced substantial carbon losses. This suggests that while dense vegetation enhances soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, it also increases carbon release per unit of soil loss due to higher organic inputs. These findings underscore the importance of proactive vegetation conservation strategies. By providing reliable modeling results and evaluating land management practices, this study offers valuable insights for developing effective wind erosion mitigation policies in rangelands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 109159"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225004618","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rangelands in the western United States play a crucial role in maintaining air quality but are highly vulnerable to wind erosion due to low soil moisture and sparse vegetation. Soil serves as a carbon sink, yet its erosion releases significant carbon into the atmosphere, exacerbating climate change. Effective conservation policies require accurate physics-based modeling of wind erosion rates. This study integrates the Landscape Wind Erosion (LWE) module into the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model to simulate wind-driven soil erosion and carbon loss under various management scenarios. Three representative sites–Jornada (New Mexico), Moab (Utah), and San Luis Valley (Colorado)–were selected for evaluation. At 0.39 t/ha/yr benchmark scenario wind erosion, a 10 % increasing vegetation reduced erosion by 40 %, while a 10 % decrease raised it by 80 %. These findings also extend to SOC losses, showing 1.4 t C/ha over 20 years, dropping to 0.8 with a 10 % vegetation increase and rising to 3.7 with a 10 % decrease. This highlights that conservation policies focused on preserving vegetation are more effective than recovery efforts in mitigating erosion. Additionally, although sites with higher vegetation cover had lower erosion rates, they experienced substantial carbon losses. This suggests that while dense vegetation enhances soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, it also increases carbon release per unit of soil loss due to higher organic inputs. These findings underscore the importance of proactive vegetation conservation strategies. By providing reliable modeling results and evaluating land management practices, this study offers valuable insights for developing effective wind erosion mitigation policies in rangelands.
美国西部牧场不同土地管理措施下风蚀引起的土壤沉积和有机碳损失
美国西部的牧场在维持空气质量方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但由于土壤湿度低和植被稀疏,它们极易受到风蚀的影响。土壤是碳汇,但土壤的侵蚀将大量碳释放到大气中,加剧了气候变化。有效的保护政策需要精确的基于物理的风蚀率模型。本研究将景观风蚀(LWE)模块整合到农业政策/环境扩展器(APEX)模型中,模拟不同管理情景下风驱动的土壤侵蚀和碳流失。三个具有代表性的地点——约旦(新墨西哥州)、摩押(犹他州)和圣路易斯谷(科罗拉多州)——被选中进行评估。在0.39吨/公顷/年的基准风蚀情景下,植被增加10%可使侵蚀减少40%,而减少10%可使侵蚀增加80%。这些发现也适用于有机碳损失,在20年内显示1.4 t C/ha,当植被增加10%时下降到0.8 t C/ha,当植被减少10%时上升到3.7 t C/ha。这突出表明,在减轻侵蚀方面,侧重于保护植被的保护政策比恢复工作更有效。此外,尽管植被覆盖率高的地点侵蚀率较低,但它们经历了大量的碳损失。这表明,茂密植被在增加土壤有机碳(SOC)储量的同时,也增加了单位土壤流失的碳释放量。这些发现强调了积极的植被保护策略的重要性。通过提供可靠的建模结果和评估土地管理实践,本研究为制定有效的牧场风蚀缓解政策提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信